Hi
As I understand it rfc3327 is not supported in SER 0.9.6 . When I read the documentation for SER 2.0 I could not find anything written on the rfc3327 subject. But for SER 1.1.X the support for rfc3327 seem to be implemented. But SER 1.1.X has no stable release, right?
Am I right ? Please advice as to which version of SER I should turn to have this service in my SIP domain.
Hi Stefan, The Path header is quite easy to implement as uri variables using the new 2.0 select/avp frameworks. It can also be implemented in 0.9.x in a similar way, but using a module called avpops. SER does not have a 1.1 version. As you can see on http://iptel.org/downloads, the latest released version is 0.9.x, while 2.0 is the upcoming release. I really recommend using 2.0, as it has proven stable and has been commercially deployed. It will be released as soon as docs are more in place. g-)
Stefan Ljung (TN/EAB) wrote:
Hi
As I understand it rfc3327 is not supported in SER 0.9.6 . When I read the documentation for SER 2.0 I could not find anything written on the rfc3327 subject. But for SER 1.1.X the support for rfc3327 seem to be implemented. But SER 1.1.X has no stable release, right?
Am I right ? Please advice as to which version of SER I should turn to have this service in my SIP domain.
Serusers mailing list Serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
-
Greger V. Teigre -
Stefan Ljung (TN/EAB)