Hi,
When I try to store message in the database I get the following errors in the syslog (There are no messages stored in the database):
May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: ERROR: parse_uri: uri too short: <> (0) May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: ERROR: uri2dst: bad_uri: May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: t_uac: no socket found
And here is ser.cfg: xlog("L_INFO", " route[INBOUND]: (m_store (0, )) \n"); if (m_store ("0", "")) { xlog("L_INFO", " route[INBOUND]: offline message stored \n"); xlog("L_INFO", " route[INBOUND]: (!t_reply(202,Accepted) \n"); if (!t_reply("202", "Accepted")) { xlog("L_INFO", " route[INBOUND]: sl_reply_error() \n"); sl_reply_error(); } }
the error appears in the following place accordin to my logging: May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: route[INBOUND]: (m_store (0, )) May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: ERROR: parse_uri: uri too short: <> (0) May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: ERROR: uri2dst: bad_uri: May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: t_uac: no socket found May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: route[INBOUND]: offline message stored May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: route[INBOUND]: (!t_reply(202,Accepted) May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: route[INBOUND]: drop <MESSAGE> sip:hulk@voip.rd.touk.pl
Below is the Message transaction sent through SER:
U 2007/05/14 15:26:40.746835 192.168.0.165:7089 -> 192.168.0.165:5060 MESSAGE sip:hulk@voip.rd.touk.pl SIP/2.0. CSeq: 64 MESSAGE. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.0.165:7089;branch=z9hG4bK24d4276b-8c00-dc11-982b-00148539376e;rport. From: "Sen" sip:sen@voip.rd.touk.pl;tag=a0d0276b-8c00-dc11-982b-00148539376e. Call-ID: 32c6276b-8c00-dc11-982b-00148539376e@sen. To: "hulk@" sip:hulk@voip.rd.touk.pl. Allow: INVITE,ACK,OPTIONS,BYE,CANCEL,NOTIFY,REFER,MESSAGE. Content-Type: text/plain;charset=UTF-8. Content-Length: 12. Max-Forwards: 70. . test message # U 2007/05/14 15:26:40.790793 192.168.0.165:5060 -> 192.168.0.165:7089 SIP/2.0 202 Accepted. CSeq: 64 MESSAGE. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.0.165:7089;branch=z9hG4bK24d4276b-8c00-dc11-982b-00148539376e;rport=7089. From: "Sen" sip:sen@voip.rd.touk.pl;tag=a0d0276b-8c00-dc11-982b-00148539376e. Call-ID: 32c6276b-8c00-dc11-982b-00148539376e@sen. To: "hulk@" sip:hulk@voip.rd.touk.pl;tag=a6a1c5f60faecf035a1ae5b6e96e979a-fd05. Server: Sip EXpress router (2.0.0-rc1 (x86_64/linux)). Content-Length: 0. Warning: 392 192.168.0.165:5060 "Noisy feedback tells: pid=5853 req_src_ip=192.168.0.165 req_src_port=7089 in_uri=sip:hulk@voip.rd.touk.pl out_uri=sip:hulk@voip.rd.touk.pl via_cnt==1". .
Thanks for any feedback! Cheers Tomasz
You can try apply patch like this: diff -r f576f4aff98e modules/msilo/msilo.c --- a/modules/msilo/msilo.c Mon May 14 15:28:46 2007 +0200 +++ b/modules/msilo/msilo.c Mon May 14 17:22:27 2007 +0200 @@ -325,9 +325,9 @@ static int m_store(struct sip_msg* msg, goto error; } mode = str1[0] - '0'; - if (str2) { + next_hop.len = strlen(str2); + if (next_hop.len) { next_hop.s = str2; - next_hop.len = strlen(str2); }
if (get_to_uid(&uid, msg) < 0) {
And please fill bug report at tracker. Michal
On Po, 2007-05-14 at 15:35 +0200, tzieleniewski wrote:
Hi,
When I try to store message in the database I get the following errors in the syslog (There are no messages stored in the database):
May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: ERROR: parse_uri: uri too short: <> (0) May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: ERROR: uri2dst: bad_uri: May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: t_uac: no socket found
And here is ser.cfg: xlog("L_INFO", " route[INBOUND]: (m_store (0, )) \n"); if (m_store ("0", "")) { xlog("L_INFO", " route[INBOUND]: offline message stored \n"); xlog("L_INFO", " route[INBOUND]: (!t_reply(202,Accepted) \n"); if (!t_reply("202", "Accepted")) { xlog("L_INFO", " route[INBOUND]: sl_reply_error() \n"); sl_reply_error(); } }
the error appears in the following place accordin to my logging: May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: route[INBOUND]: (m_store (0, )) May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: ERROR: parse_uri: uri too short: <> (0) May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: ERROR: uri2dst: bad_uri: May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: t_uac: no socket found May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: route[INBOUND]: offline message stored May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: route[INBOUND]: (!t_reply(202,Accepted) May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: route[INBOUND]: drop <MESSAGE> sip:hulk@voip.rd.touk.pl
Below is the Message transaction sent through SER:
U 2007/05/14 15:26:40.746835 192.168.0.165:7089 -> 192.168.0.165:5060 MESSAGE sip:hulk@voip.rd.touk.pl SIP/2.0. CSeq: 64 MESSAGE. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.0.165:7089;branch=z9hG4bK24d4276b-8c00-dc11-982b-00148539376e;rport. From: "Sen" sip:sen@voip.rd.touk.pl;tag=a0d0276b-8c00-dc11-982b-00148539376e. Call-ID: 32c6276b-8c00-dc11-982b-00148539376e@sen. To: "hulk@" sip:hulk@voip.rd.touk.pl. Allow: INVITE,ACK,OPTIONS,BYE,CANCEL,NOTIFY,REFER,MESSAGE. Content-Type: text/plain;charset=UTF-8. Content-Length: 12. Max-Forwards: 70. . test message # U 2007/05/14 15:26:40.790793 192.168.0.165:5060 -> 192.168.0.165:7089 SIP/2.0 202 Accepted. CSeq: 64 MESSAGE. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.0.165:7089;branch=z9hG4bK24d4276b-8c00-dc11-982b-00148539376e;rport=7089. From: "Sen" sip:sen@voip.rd.touk.pl;tag=a0d0276b-8c00-dc11-982b-00148539376e. Call-ID: 32c6276b-8c00-dc11-982b-00148539376e@sen. To: "hulk@" sip:hulk@voip.rd.touk.pl;tag=a6a1c5f60faecf035a1ae5b6e96e979a-fd05. Server: Sip EXpress router (2.0.0-rc1 (x86_64/linux)). Content-Length: 0. Warning: 392 192.168.0.165:5060 "Noisy feedback tells: pid=5853 req_src_ip=192.168.0.165 req_src_port=7089 in_uri=sip:hulk@voip.rd.touk.pl out_uri=sip:hulk@voip.rd.touk.pl via_cnt==1". .
Thanks for any feedback! Cheers Tomasz
Serusers mailing list Serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
I have created the bug report and I will correct it.
Vaclav
On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 05:24:55PM +0200, Michal Matyska wrote:
You can try apply patch like this: diff -r f576f4aff98e modules/msilo/msilo.c --- a/modules/msilo/msilo.c Mon May 14 15:28:46 2007 +0200 +++ b/modules/msilo/msilo.c Mon May 14 17:22:27 2007 +0200 @@ -325,9 +325,9 @@ static int m_store(struct sip_msg* msg, goto error; } mode = str1[0] - '0';
if (str2) {
next_hop.len = strlen(str2);if (next_hop.len) { next_hop.s = str2;
next_hop.len = strlen(str2); } if (get_to_uid(&uid, msg) < 0) {And please fill bug report at tracker. Michal
On Po, 2007-05-14 at 15:35 +0200, tzieleniewski wrote:
Hi,
When I try to store message in the database I get the following errors in the syslog (There are no messages stored in the database):
May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: ERROR: parse_uri: uri too short: <> (0) May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: ERROR: uri2dst: bad_uri: May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: t_uac: no socket found
And here is ser.cfg: xlog("L_INFO", " route[INBOUND]: (m_store (0, )) \n"); if (m_store ("0", "")) { xlog("L_INFO", " route[INBOUND]: offline message stored \n"); xlog("L_INFO", " route[INBOUND]: (!t_reply(202,Accepted) \n"); if (!t_reply("202", "Accepted")) { xlog("L_INFO", " route[INBOUND]: sl_reply_error() \n"); sl_reply_error(); } }
the error appears in the following place accordin to my logging: May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: route[INBOUND]: (m_store (0, )) May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: ERROR: parse_uri: uri too short: <> (0) May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: ERROR: uri2dst: bad_uri: May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: t_uac: no socket found May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: route[INBOUND]: offline message stored May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: route[INBOUND]: (!t_reply(202,Accepted) May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: route[INBOUND]: drop <MESSAGE> sip:hulk@voip.rd.touk.pl
Below is the Message transaction sent through SER:
U 2007/05/14 15:26:40.746835 192.168.0.165:7089 -> 192.168.0.165:5060 MESSAGE sip:hulk@voip.rd.touk.pl SIP/2.0. CSeq: 64 MESSAGE. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.0.165:7089;branch=z9hG4bK24d4276b-8c00-dc11-982b-00148539376e;rport. From: "Sen" sip:sen@voip.rd.touk.pl;tag=a0d0276b-8c00-dc11-982b-00148539376e. Call-ID: 32c6276b-8c00-dc11-982b-00148539376e@sen. To: "hulk@" sip:hulk@voip.rd.touk.pl. Allow: INVITE,ACK,OPTIONS,BYE,CANCEL,NOTIFY,REFER,MESSAGE. Content-Type: text/plain;charset=UTF-8. Content-Length: 12. Max-Forwards: 70. . test message # U 2007/05/14 15:26:40.790793 192.168.0.165:5060 -> 192.168.0.165:7089 SIP/2.0 202 Accepted. CSeq: 64 MESSAGE. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.0.165:7089;branch=z9hG4bK24d4276b-8c00-dc11-982b-00148539376e;rport=7089. From: "Sen" sip:sen@voip.rd.touk.pl;tag=a0d0276b-8c00-dc11-982b-00148539376e. Call-ID: 32c6276b-8c00-dc11-982b-00148539376e@sen. To: "hulk@" sip:hulk@voip.rd.touk.pl;tag=a6a1c5f60faecf035a1ae5b6e96e979a-fd05. Server: Sip EXpress router (2.0.0-rc1 (x86_64/linux)). Content-Length: 0. Warning: 392 192.168.0.165:5060 "Noisy feedback tells: pid=5853 req_src_ip=192.168.0.165 req_src_port=7089 in_uri=sip:hulk@voip.rd.touk.pl out_uri=sip:hulk@voip.rd.touk.pl via_cnt==1". .
Thanks for any feedback! Cheers Tomasz
Serusers mailing list Serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Serusers mailing list Serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Hi michal,
I run the following patch but there was an error, can you please take a look. my output below:
ser@sen:~/src/ser-2.0/modules/msilo$ patch -p0 msilo.c < msilo.c.patch patching file msilo.c Hunk #1 FAILED at 325. 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file msilo.c.rej ser@sen:~/src/ser-2.0/modules/msilo$ cat msilo.c.patch --- msilo.c Mon May 14 15:28:46 2007 +0200 +++ msilo.c Mon May 14 17:22:27 2007 +0200 @@ -325,9 +325,9 @@ goto error; } mode = str1[0] - '0'; - if (str2) { + next_hop.len = strlen(str2); + if (next_hop.len) { next_hop.s = str2; - next_hop.len = strlen(str2); }
if (get_to_uid(&uid, msg) < 0) {
Cheers tomasz
You can try apply patch like this: diff -r f576f4aff98e modules/msilo/msilo.c --- a/modules/msilo/msilo.c Mon May 14 15:28:46 2007 +0200 +++ b/modules/msilo/msilo.c Mon May 14 17:22:27 2007 +0200 @@ -325,9 +325,9 @@ static int m_store(struct sip_msg* msg, goto error; } mode = str1[0] - '0';
if (str2) {
next_hop.len = strlen(str2);if (next_hop.len) { next_hop.s = str2;
next_hop.len = strlen(str2); } if (get_to_uid(&uid, msg) < 0) {And please fill bug report at tracker. Michal
On Po, 2007-05-14 at 15:35 +0200, tzieleniewski wrote:
Hi,
When I try to store message in the database I get the following errors in the syslog (There are no messages stored in the database):
May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: ERROR: parse_uri: uri too short: <> (0) May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: ERROR: uri2dst: bad_uri: May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: t_uac: no socket found
And here is ser.cfg: xlog("L_INFO", " route[INBOUND]: (m_store (0, )) \n"); if (m_store ("0", "")) { xlog("L_INFO", " route[INBOUND]: offline message stored \n"); xlog("L_INFO", " route[INBOUND]: (!t_reply(202,Accepted) \n"); if (!t_reply("202", "Accepted")) { xlog("L_INFO", " route[INBOUND]: sl_reply_error() \n"); sl_reply_error(); } }
the error appears in the following place accordin to my logging: May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: route[INBOUND]: (m_store (0, )) May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: ERROR: parse_uri: uri too short: <> (0) May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: ERROR: uri2dst: bad_uri: May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: t_uac: no socket found May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: route[INBOUND]: offline message stored May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: route[INBOUND]: (!t_reply(202,Accepted) May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: route[INBOUND]: drop <MESSAGE> sip:hulk@voip.rd.touk.pl
Below is the Message transaction sent through SER:
U 2007/05/14 15:26:40.746835 192.168.0.165:7089 -> 192.168.0.165:5060 MESSAGE sip:hulk@voip.rd.touk.pl SIP/2.0. CSeq: 64 MESSAGE. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.0.165:7089;branch=z9hG4bK24d4276b-8c00-dc11-982b-00148539376e;rport. From: "Sen" sip:sen@voip.rd.touk.pl;tag=a0d0276b-8c00-dc11-982b-00148539376e. Call-ID: 32c6276b-8c00-dc11-982b-00148539376e@sen. To: "hulk@" sip:hulk@voip.rd.touk.pl. Allow: INVITE,ACK,OPTIONS,BYE,CANCEL,NOTIFY,REFER,MESSAGE. Content-Type: text/plain;charset=UTF-8. Content-Length: 12. Max-Forwards: 70. . test message # U 2007/05/14 15:26:40.790793 192.168.0.165:5060 -> 192.168.0.165:7089 SIP/2.0 202 Accepted. CSeq: 64 MESSAGE. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.0.165:7089;branch=z9hG4bK24d4276b-8c00-dc11-982b-00148539376e;rport=7089. From: "Sen" sip:sen@voip.rd.touk.pl;tag=a0d0276b-8c00-dc11-982b-00148539376e. Call-ID: 32c6276b-8c00-dc11-982b-00148539376e@sen. To: "hulk@" sip:hulk@voip.rd.touk.pl;tag=a6a1c5f60faecf035a1ae5b6e96e979a-fd05. Server: Sip EXpress router (2.0.0-rc1 (x86_64/linux)). Content-Length: 0. Warning: 392 192.168.0.165:5060 "Noisy feedback tells: pid=5853 req_src_ip=192.168.0.165 req_src_port=7089 in_uri=sip:hulk@voip.rd.touk.pl out_uri=sip:hulk@voip.rd.touk.pl via_cnt==1". .
Thanks for any feedback! Cheers Tomasz
Serusers mailing list Serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Hi, try run patch with one more parameter -l (or --ignore-whitespace). I will attach the patch instead putting it inline next time.
Michal
On St, 2007-05-16 at 09:56 +0200, tzieleniewski wrote:
Hi michal,
I run the following patch but there was an error, can you please take a look. my output below:
ser@sen:~/src/ser-2.0/modules/msilo$ patch -p0 msilo.c < msilo.c.patch patching file msilo.c Hunk #1 FAILED at 325. 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file msilo.c.rej ser@sen:~/src/ser-2.0/modules/msilo$ cat msilo.c.patch --- msilo.c Mon May 14 15:28:46 2007 +0200 +++ msilo.c Mon May 14 17:22:27 2007 +0200 @@ -325,9 +325,9 @@ goto error; } mode = str1[0] - '0';
if (str2) {
next_hop.len = strlen(str2);if (next_hop.len) { next_hop.s = str2;
next_hop.len = strlen(str2); } if (get_to_uid(&uid, msg) < 0) {Cheers tomasz
You can try apply patch like this: diff -r f576f4aff98e modules/msilo/msilo.c --- a/modules/msilo/msilo.c Mon May 14 15:28:46 2007 +0200 +++ b/modules/msilo/msilo.c Mon May 14 17:22:27 2007 +0200 @@ -325,9 +325,9 @@ static int m_store(struct sip_msg* msg, goto error; } mode = str1[0] - '0';
if (str2) {
next_hop.len = strlen(str2);if (next_hop.len) { next_hop.s = str2;
next_hop.len = strlen(str2); } if (get_to_uid(&uid, msg) < 0) {And please fill bug report at tracker. Michal
On Po, 2007-05-14 at 15:35 +0200, tzieleniewski wrote:
Hi,
When I try to store message in the database I get the following errors in the syslog (There are no messages stored in the database):
May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: ERROR: parse_uri: uri too short: <> (0) May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: ERROR: uri2dst: bad_uri: May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: t_uac: no socket found
And here is ser.cfg: xlog("L_INFO", " route[INBOUND]: (m_store (0, )) \n"); if (m_store ("0", "")) { xlog("L_INFO", " route[INBOUND]: offline message stored \n"); xlog("L_INFO", " route[INBOUND]: (!t_reply(202,Accepted) \n"); if (!t_reply("202", "Accepted")) { xlog("L_INFO", " route[INBOUND]: sl_reply_error() \n"); sl_reply_error(); } }
the error appears in the following place accordin to my logging: May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: route[INBOUND]: (m_store (0, )) May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: ERROR: parse_uri: uri too short: <> (0) May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: ERROR: uri2dst: bad_uri: May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: t_uac: no socket found May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: route[INBOUND]: offline message stored May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: route[INBOUND]: (!t_reply(202,Accepted) May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: route[INBOUND]: drop <MESSAGE> sip:hulk@voip.rd.touk.pl
Below is the Message transaction sent through SER:
U 2007/05/14 15:26:40.746835 192.168.0.165:7089 -> 192.168.0.165:5060 MESSAGE sip:hulk@voip.rd.touk.pl SIP/2.0. CSeq: 64 MESSAGE. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.0.165:7089;branch=z9hG4bK24d4276b-8c00-dc11-982b-00148539376e;rport. From: "Sen" sip:sen@voip.rd.touk.pl;tag=a0d0276b-8c00-dc11-982b-00148539376e. Call-ID: 32c6276b-8c00-dc11-982b-00148539376e@sen. To: "hulk@" sip:hulk@voip.rd.touk.pl. Allow: INVITE,ACK,OPTIONS,BYE,CANCEL,NOTIFY,REFER,MESSAGE. Content-Type: text/plain;charset=UTF-8. Content-Length: 12. Max-Forwards: 70. . test message # U 2007/05/14 15:26:40.790793 192.168.0.165:5060 -> 192.168.0.165:7089 SIP/2.0 202 Accepted. CSeq: 64 MESSAGE. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.0.165:7089;branch=z9hG4bK24d4276b-8c00-dc11-982b-00148539376e;rport=7089. From: "Sen" sip:sen@voip.rd.touk.pl;tag=a0d0276b-8c00-dc11-982b-00148539376e. Call-ID: 32c6276b-8c00-dc11-982b-00148539376e@sen. To: "hulk@" sip:hulk@voip.rd.touk.pl;tag=a6a1c5f60faecf035a1ae5b6e96e979a-fd05. Server: Sip EXpress router (2.0.0-rc1 (x86_64/linux)). Content-Length: 0. Warning: 392 192.168.0.165:5060 "Noisy feedback tells: pid=5853 req_src_ip=192.168.0.165 req_src_port=7089 in_uri=sip:hulk@voip.rd.touk.pl out_uri=sip:hulk@voip.rd.touk.pl via_cnt==1". .
Thanks for any feedback! Cheers Tomasz
Serusers mailing list Serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Thanks michal,
I did it and it worked after patch there appeared an analogous error in the m_dump(..) function in the msilo.c I made the similar correction and now everything works fine. I attached my patch for both things:)
Cheers tomasz
Hi, try run patch with one more parameter -l (or --ignore-whitespace). I will attach the patch instead putting it inline next time.
Michal
On St, 2007-05-16 at 09:56 +0200, tzieleniewski wrote:
Hi michal,
I run the following patch but there was an error, can you please take a look. my output below:
ser@sen:~/src/ser-2.0/modules/msilo$ patch -p0 msilo.c < msilo.c.patch patching file msilo.c Hunk #1 FAILED at 325. 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file msilo.c.rej ser@sen:~/src/ser-2.0/modules/msilo$ cat msilo.c.patch --- msilo.c Mon May 14 15:28:46 2007 +0200 +++ msilo.c Mon May 14 17:22:27 2007 +0200 @@ -325,9 +325,9 @@ goto error; } mode = str1[0] - '0';
if (str2) {
next_hop.len = strlen(str2);if (next_hop.len) { next_hop.s = str2;
next_hop.len = strlen(str2); } if (get_to_uid(&uid, msg) < 0) {Cheers tomasz
You can try apply patch like this: diff -r f576f4aff98e modules/msilo/msilo.c --- a/modules/msilo/msilo.c Mon May 14 15:28:46 2007 +0200 +++ b/modules/msilo/msilo.c Mon May 14 17:22:27 2007 +0200 @@ -325,9 +325,9 @@ static int m_store(struct sip_msg* msg, goto error; } mode = str1[0] - '0';
if (str2) {
next_hop.len = strlen(str2);if (next_hop.len) { next_hop.s = str2;
next_hop.len = strlen(str2); } if (get_to_uid(&uid, msg) < 0) {And please fill bug report at tracker. Michal
On Po, 2007-05-14 at 15:35 +0200, tzieleniewski wrote:
Hi,
When I try to store message in the database I get the following errors in the syslog (There are no messages stored in the database):
May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: ERROR: parse_uri: uri too short: <> (0) May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: ERROR: uri2dst: bad_uri: May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: t_uac: no socket found
And here is ser.cfg: xlog("L_INFO", " route[INBOUND]: (m_store (0, )) \n"); if (m_store ("0", "")) { xlog("L_INFO", " route[INBOUND]: offline message stored \n"); xlog("L_INFO", " route[INBOUND]: (!t_reply(202,Accepted) \n"); if (!t_reply("202", "Accepted")) { xlog("L_INFO", " route[INBOUND]: sl_reply_error() \n"); sl_reply_error(); } }
the error appears in the following place accordin to my logging: May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: route[INBOUND]: (m_store (0, )) May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: ERROR: parse_uri: uri too short: <> (0) May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: ERROR: uri2dst: bad_uri: May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: t_uac: no socket found May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: route[INBOUND]: offline message stored May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: route[INBOUND]: (!t_reply(202,Accepted) May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: route[INBOUND]: drop <MESSAGE> sip:hulk@voip.rd.touk.pl
Below is the Message transaction sent through SER:
U 2007/05/14 15:26:40.746835 192.168.0.165:7089 -> 192.168.0.165:5060 MESSAGE sip:hulk@voip.rd.touk.pl SIP/2.0. CSeq: 64 MESSAGE. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.0.165:7089;branch=z9hG4bK24d4276b-8c00-dc11-982b-00148539376e;rport. From: "Sen" sip:sen@voip.rd.touk.pl;tag=a0d0276b-8c00-dc11-982b-00148539376e. Call-ID: 32c6276b-8c00-dc11-982b-00148539376e@sen. To: "hulk@" sip:hulk@voip.rd.touk.pl. Allow: INVITE,ACK,OPTIONS,BYE,CANCEL,NOTIFY,REFER,MESSAGE. Content-Type: text/plain;charset=UTF-8. Content-Length: 12. Max-Forwards: 70. . test message # U 2007/05/14 15:26:40.790793 192.168.0.165:5060 -> 192.168.0.165:7089 SIP/2.0 202 Accepted. CSeq: 64 MESSAGE. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.0.165:7089;branch=z9hG4bK24d4276b-8c00-dc11-982b-00148539376e;rport=7089. From: "Sen" sip:sen@voip.rd.touk.pl;tag=a0d0276b-8c00-dc11-982b-00148539376e. Call-ID: 32c6276b-8c00-dc11-982b-00148539376e@sen. To: "hulk@" sip:hulk@voip.rd.touk.pl;tag=a6a1c5f60faecf035a1ae5b6e96e979a-fd05. Server: Sip EXpress router (2.0.0-rc1 (x86_64/linux)). Content-Length: 0. Warning: 392 192.168.0.165:5060 "Noisy feedback tells: pid=5853 req_src_ip=192.168.0.165 req_src_port=7089 in_uri=sip:hulk@voip.rd.touk.pl out_uri=sip:hulk@voip.rd.touk.pl via_cnt==1". .
Thanks for any feedback! Cheers Tomasz
Serusers mailing list Serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Tomasz, it is strange, but it works for me without any patches. Please, could you send me your msilo module parameters?
thanks
Vaclav
On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 10:28:29AM +0200, tzieleniewski wrote:
Thanks michal,
I did it and it worked after patch there appeared an analogous error in the m_dump(..) function in the msilo.c I made the similar correction and now everything works fine. I attached my patch for both things:)
Cheers tomasz
Hi, try run patch with one more parameter -l (or --ignore-whitespace). I will attach the patch instead putting it inline next time.
Michal
On St, 2007-05-16 at 09:56 +0200, tzieleniewski wrote:
Hi michal,
I run the following patch but there was an error, can you please take a look. my output below:
ser@sen:~/src/ser-2.0/modules/msilo$ patch -p0 msilo.c < msilo.c.patch patching file msilo.c Hunk #1 FAILED at 325. 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file msilo.c.rej ser@sen:~/src/ser-2.0/modules/msilo$ cat msilo.c.patch --- msilo.c Mon May 14 15:28:46 2007 +0200 +++ msilo.c Mon May 14 17:22:27 2007 +0200 @@ -325,9 +325,9 @@ goto error; } mode = str1[0] - '0';
if (str2) {
next_hop.len = strlen(str2);if (next_hop.len) { next_hop.s = str2;
next_hop.len = strlen(str2); } if (get_to_uid(&uid, msg) < 0) {Cheers tomasz
You can try apply patch like this: diff -r f576f4aff98e modules/msilo/msilo.c --- a/modules/msilo/msilo.c Mon May 14 15:28:46 2007 +0200 +++ b/modules/msilo/msilo.c Mon May 14 17:22:27 2007 +0200 @@ -325,9 +325,9 @@ static int m_store(struct sip_msg* msg, goto error; } mode = str1[0] - '0';
if (str2) {
next_hop.len = strlen(str2);if (next_hop.len) { next_hop.s = str2;
next_hop.len = strlen(str2); } if (get_to_uid(&uid, msg) < 0) {And please fill bug report at tracker. Michal
On Po, 2007-05-14 at 15:35 +0200, tzieleniewski wrote:
Hi,
When I try to store message in the database I get the following errors in the syslog (There are no messages stored in the database):
May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: ERROR: parse_uri: uri too short: <> (0) May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: ERROR: uri2dst: bad_uri: May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: t_uac: no socket found
And here is ser.cfg: xlog("L_INFO", " route[INBOUND]: (m_store (0, )) \n"); if (m_store ("0", "")) { xlog("L_INFO", " route[INBOUND]: offline message stored \n"); xlog("L_INFO", " route[INBOUND]: (!t_reply(202,Accepted) \n"); if (!t_reply("202", "Accepted")) { xlog("L_INFO", " route[INBOUND]: sl_reply_error() \n"); sl_reply_error(); } }
the error appears in the following place accordin to my logging: May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: route[INBOUND]: (m_store (0, )) May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: ERROR: parse_uri: uri too short: <> (0) May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: ERROR: uri2dst: bad_uri: May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: t_uac: no socket found May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: route[INBOUND]: offline message stored May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: route[INBOUND]: (!t_reply(202,Accepted) May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: route[INBOUND]: drop <MESSAGE> sip:hulk@voip.rd.touk.pl
Below is the Message transaction sent through SER:
U 2007/05/14 15:26:40.746835 192.168.0.165:7089 -> 192.168.0.165:5060 MESSAGE sip:hulk@voip.rd.touk.pl SIP/2.0. CSeq: 64 MESSAGE. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.0.165:7089;branch=z9hG4bK24d4276b-8c00-dc11-982b-00148539376e;rport. From: "Sen" sip:sen@voip.rd.touk.pl;tag=a0d0276b-8c00-dc11-982b-00148539376e. Call-ID: 32c6276b-8c00-dc11-982b-00148539376e@sen. To: "hulk@" sip:hulk@voip.rd.touk.pl. Allow: INVITE,ACK,OPTIONS,BYE,CANCEL,NOTIFY,REFER,MESSAGE. Content-Type: text/plain;charset=UTF-8. Content-Length: 12. Max-Forwards: 70. . test message # U 2007/05/14 15:26:40.790793 192.168.0.165:5060 -> 192.168.0.165:7089 SIP/2.0 202 Accepted. CSeq: 64 MESSAGE. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.0.165:7089;branch=z9hG4bK24d4276b-8c00-dc11-982b-00148539376e;rport=7089. From: "Sen" sip:sen@voip.rd.touk.pl;tag=a0d0276b-8c00-dc11-982b-00148539376e. Call-ID: 32c6276b-8c00-dc11-982b-00148539376e@sen. To: "hulk@" sip:hulk@voip.rd.touk.pl;tag=a6a1c5f60faecf035a1ae5b6e96e979a-fd05. Server: Sip EXpress router (2.0.0-rc1 (x86_64/linux)). Content-Length: 0. Warning: 392 192.168.0.165:5060 "Noisy feedback tells: pid=5853 req_src_ip=192.168.0.165 req_src_port=7089 in_uri=sip:hulk@voip.rd.touk.pl out_uri=sip:hulk@voip.rd.touk.pl via_cnt==1". .
Thanks for any feedback! Cheers Tomasz
Serusers mailing list Serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Serusers mailing list Serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Hi,
Sure here they are: #modparam("msilo","registrar","sip:registrar@voip.touk.pl") modparam("msilo", "db_table", "silo") modparam("msilo", "expire_time", 259200) # 72h - 3 days modparam("msilo", "check_time", 30) modparam("msilo", "clean_period", 5) modparam("msilo", "use_contact", 0)
Cheers
Tomasz, it is strange, but it works for me without any patches. Please, could you send me your msilo module parameters?
thanks
VaclavOn Wed, May 16, 2007 at 10:28:29AM +0200, tzieleniewski wrote:
Thanks michal,
I did it and it worked after patch there appeared an analogous error in the m_dump(..) function in the msilo.c I made the similar correction and now everything works fine. I attached my patch for both things:)
Cheers tomasz
Hi, try run patch with one more parameter -l (or --ignore-whitespace). I will attach the patch instead putting it inline next time.
Michal
On St, 2007-05-16 at 09:56 +0200, tzieleniewski wrote:
Hi michal,
I run the following patch but there was an error, can you please take a look. my output below:
ser@sen:~/src/ser-2.0/modules/msilo$ patch -p0 msilo.c < msilo.c.patch patching file msilo.c Hunk #1 FAILED at 325. 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file msilo.c.rej ser@sen:~/src/ser-2.0/modules/msilo$ cat msilo.c.patch --- msilo.c Mon May 14 15:28:46 2007 +0200 +++ msilo.c Mon May 14 17:22:27 2007 +0200 @@ -325,9 +325,9 @@ goto error; } mode = str1[0] - '0';
if (str2) {
next_hop.len = strlen(str2);if (next_hop.len) { next_hop.s = str2;
next_hop.len = strlen(str2); } if (get_to_uid(&uid, msg) < 0) {Cheers tomasz
You can try apply patch like this: diff -r f576f4aff98e modules/msilo/msilo.c --- a/modules/msilo/msilo.c Mon May 14 15:28:46 2007 +0200 +++ b/modules/msilo/msilo.c Mon May 14 17:22:27 2007 +0200 @@ -325,9 +325,9 @@ static int m_store(struct sip_msg* msg, goto error; } mode = str1[0] - '0';
if (str2) {
next_hop.len = strlen(str2);if (next_hop.len) { next_hop.s = str2;
next_hop.len = strlen(str2); } if (get_to_uid(&uid, msg) < 0) {And please fill bug report at tracker. Michal
On Po, 2007-05-14 at 15:35 +0200, tzieleniewski wrote:
Hi,
When I try to store message in the database I get the following errors in the syslog (There are no messages stored in the database):
May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: ERROR: parse_uri: uri too short: <> (0) May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: ERROR: uri2dst: bad_uri: May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: t_uac: no socket found
And here is ser.cfg: xlog("L_INFO", " route[INBOUND]: (m_store (0, )) \n"); if (m_store ("0", "")) { xlog("L_INFO", " route[INBOUND]: offline message stored \n"); xlog("L_INFO", " route[INBOUND]: (!t_reply(202,Accepted) \n"); if (!t_reply("202", "Accepted")) { xlog("L_INFO", " route[INBOUND]: sl_reply_error() \n"); sl_reply_error(); } }
the error appears in the following place accordin to my logging: May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: route[INBOUND]: (m_store (0, )) May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: ERROR: parse_uri: uri too short: <> (0) May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: ERROR: uri2dst: bad_uri: May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: t_uac: no socket found May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: route[INBOUND]: offline message stored May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: route[INBOUND]: (!t_reply(202,Accepted) May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: route[INBOUND]: drop <MESSAGE> sip:hulk@voip.rd.touk.pl
Below is the Message transaction sent through SER:
U 2007/05/14 15:26:40.746835 192.168.0.165:7089 -> 192.168.0.165:5060 MESSAGE sip:hulk@voip.rd.touk.pl SIP/2.0. CSeq: 64 MESSAGE. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.0.165:7089;branch=z9hG4bK24d4276b-8c00-dc11-982b-00148539376e;rport. From: "Sen" sip:sen@voip.rd.touk.pl;tag=a0d0276b-8c00-dc11-982b-00148539376e. Call-ID: 32c6276b-8c00-dc11-982b-00148539376e@sen. To: "hulk@" sip:hulk@voip.rd.touk.pl. Allow: INVITE,ACK,OPTIONS,BYE,CANCEL,NOTIFY,REFER,MESSAGE. Content-Type: text/plain;charset=UTF-8. Content-Length: 12. Max-Forwards: 70. . test message # U 2007/05/14 15:26:40.790793 192.168.0.165:5060 -> 192.168.0.165:7089 SIP/2.0 202 Accepted. CSeq: 64 MESSAGE. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.0.165:7089;branch=z9hG4bK24d4276b-8c00-dc11-982b-00148539376e;rport=7089. From: "Sen" sip:sen@voip.rd.touk.pl;tag=a0d0276b-8c00-dc11-982b-00148539376e. Call-ID: 32c6276b-8c00-dc11-982b-00148539376e@sen. To: "hulk@" sip:hulk@voip.rd.touk.pl;tag=a6a1c5f60faecf035a1ae5b6e96e979a-fd05. Server: Sip EXpress router (2.0.0-rc1 (x86_64/linux)). Content-Length: 0. Warning: 392 192.168.0.165:5060 "Noisy feedback tells: pid=5853 req_src_ip=192.168.0.165 req_src_port=7089 in_uri=sip:hulk@voip.rd.touk.pl out_uri=sip:hulk@voip.rd.touk.pl via_cnt==1". .
Thanks for any feedback! Cheers Tomasz
Serusers mailing list Serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Serusers mailing list Serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Hi, thanks.
I have corrected the code in CVS. Please could you try it from there? I did the 'next_hop' parameter of msilo functions optional - thus instead of empty string you should omit the parameter [like m_dump() instead of m_dump("")]. Thanks a lot.
with regards, Vaclav
On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 11:56:49AM +0200, tzieleniewski wrote:
Hi,
Sure here they are: #modparam("msilo","registrar","sip:registrar@voip.touk.pl") modparam("msilo", "db_table", "silo") modparam("msilo", "expire_time", 259200) # 72h - 3 days modparam("msilo", "check_time", 30) modparam("msilo", "clean_period", 5) modparam("msilo", "use_contact", 0)
Cheers
Tomasz, it is strange, but it works for me without any patches. Please, could you send me your msilo module parameters?
thanks
VaclavOn Wed, May 16, 2007 at 10:28:29AM +0200, tzieleniewski wrote:
Thanks michal,
I did it and it worked after patch there appeared an analogous error in the m_dump(..) function in the msilo.c I made the similar correction and now everything works fine. I attached my patch for both things:)
Cheers tomasz
Hi, try run patch with one more parameter -l (or --ignore-whitespace). I will attach the patch instead putting it inline next time.
Michal
On St, 2007-05-16 at 09:56 +0200, tzieleniewski wrote:
Hi michal,
I run the following patch but there was an error, can you please take a look. my output below:
ser@sen:~/src/ser-2.0/modules/msilo$ patch -p0 msilo.c < msilo.c.patch patching file msilo.c Hunk #1 FAILED at 325. 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file msilo.c.rej ser@sen:~/src/ser-2.0/modules/msilo$ cat msilo.c.patch --- msilo.c Mon May 14 15:28:46 2007 +0200 +++ msilo.c Mon May 14 17:22:27 2007 +0200 @@ -325,9 +325,9 @@ goto error; } mode = str1[0] - '0';
if (str2) {
next_hop.len = strlen(str2);if (next_hop.len) { next_hop.s = str2;
next_hop.len = strlen(str2); } if (get_to_uid(&uid, msg) < 0) {Cheers tomasz
You can try apply patch like this: diff -r f576f4aff98e modules/msilo/msilo.c --- a/modules/msilo/msilo.c Mon May 14 15:28:46 2007 +0200 +++ b/modules/msilo/msilo.c Mon May 14 17:22:27 2007 +0200 @@ -325,9 +325,9 @@ static int m_store(struct sip_msg* msg, goto error; } mode = str1[0] - '0';
if (str2) {
next_hop.len = strlen(str2);if (next_hop.len) { next_hop.s = str2;
next_hop.len = strlen(str2); } if (get_to_uid(&uid, msg) < 0) {And please fill bug report at tracker. Michal
On Po, 2007-05-14 at 15:35 +0200, tzieleniewski wrote: > Hi, > > When I try to store message in the database I get the following errors in the syslog (There are no messages stored in the database): > > May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: ERROR: parse_uri: uri too short: <> (0) > May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: ERROR: uri2dst: bad_uri: > May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: t_uac: no socket found > > And here is ser.cfg: > xlog("L_INFO", " route[INBOUND]: (m_store (0, )) \n"); > if (m_store ("0", "")) > { > xlog("L_INFO", " route[INBOUND]: offline message stored \n"); > xlog("L_INFO", " route[INBOUND]: (!t_reply(202,Accepted) \n"); > if (!t_reply("202", "Accepted")) > { > xlog("L_INFO", " route[INBOUND]: sl_reply_error() \n"); > sl_reply_error(); > } > } > > the error appears in the following place accordin to my logging: > May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: route[INBOUND]: (m_store (0, )) > May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: ERROR: parse_uri: uri too short: <> (0) > May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: ERROR: uri2dst: bad_uri: > May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: t_uac: no socket found > May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: route[INBOUND]: offline message stored > May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: route[INBOUND]: (!t_reply(202,Accepted) > May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: route[INBOUND]: drop <MESSAGE> sip:hulk@voip.rd.touk.pl > > Below is the Message transaction sent through SER: > > U 2007/05/14 15:26:40.746835 192.168.0.165:7089 -> 192.168.0.165:5060 > MESSAGE sip:hulk@voip.rd.touk.pl SIP/2.0. > CSeq: 64 MESSAGE. > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.0.165:7089;branch=z9hG4bK24d4276b-8c00-dc11-982b-00148539376e;rport. > From: "Sen" sip:sen@voip.rd.touk.pl;tag=a0d0276b-8c00-dc11-982b-00148539376e. > Call-ID: 32c6276b-8c00-dc11-982b-00148539376e@sen. > To: "hulk@" sip:hulk@voip.rd.touk.pl. > Allow: INVITE,ACK,OPTIONS,BYE,CANCEL,NOTIFY,REFER,MESSAGE. > Content-Type: text/plain;charset=UTF-8. > Content-Length: 12. > Max-Forwards: 70. > . > test message > # > U 2007/05/14 15:26:40.790793 192.168.0.165:5060 -> 192.168.0.165:7089 > SIP/2.0 202 Accepted. > CSeq: 64 MESSAGE. > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.0.165:7089;branch=z9hG4bK24d4276b-8c00-dc11-982b-00148539376e;rport=7089. > From: "Sen" sip:sen@voip.rd.touk.pl;tag=a0d0276b-8c00-dc11-982b-00148539376e. > Call-ID: 32c6276b-8c00-dc11-982b-00148539376e@sen. > To: "hulk@" sip:hulk@voip.rd.touk.pl;tag=a6a1c5f60faecf035a1ae5b6e96e979a-fd05. > Server: Sip EXpress router (2.0.0-rc1 (x86_64/linux)). > Content-Length: 0. > Warning: 392 192.168.0.165:5060 "Noisy feedback tells: pid=5853 req_src_ip=192.168.0.165 req_src_port=7089 in_uri=sip:hulk@voip.rd.touk.pl out_uri=sip:hulk@voip.rd.touk.pl via_cnt==1". > . > > Thanks for any feedback! > Cheers > Tomasz > > > _______________________________________________ > Serusers mailing list > Serusers@lists.iptel.org > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Serusers mailing list Serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Ive checked out from CVS, tested without optional parameter and it works fine:)
Thanks Cheers Tomasz
Hi, thanks.
I have corrected the code in CVS. Please could you try it from there? I did the 'next_hop' parameter of msilo functions optional - thus instead of empty string you should omit the parameter [like m_dump() instead of m_dump("")]. Thanks a lot.
with regards, Vaclav
On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 11:56:49AM +0200, tzieleniewski wrote:
Hi,
Sure here they are: #modparam("msilo","registrar","sip:registrar@voip.touk.pl") modparam("msilo", "db_table", "silo") modparam("msilo", "expire_time", 259200) # 72h - 3 days modparam("msilo", "check_time", 30) modparam("msilo", "clean_period", 5) modparam("msilo", "use_contact", 0)
Cheers
Tomasz, it is strange, but it works for me without any patches. Please, could you send me your msilo module parameters?
thanks
VaclavOn Wed, May 16, 2007 at 10:28:29AM +0200, tzieleniewski wrote:
Thanks michal,
I did it and it worked after patch there appeared an analogous error in the m_dump(..) function in the msilo.c I made the similar correction and now everything works fine. I attached my patch for both things:)
Cheers tomasz
Hi, try run patch with one more parameter -l (or --ignore-whitespace). I will attach the patch instead putting it inline next time.
Michal
On St, 2007-05-16 at 09:56 +0200, tzieleniewski wrote:
Hi michal,
I run the following patch but there was an error, can you please take a look. my output below:
ser@sen:~/src/ser-2.0/modules/msilo$ patch -p0 msilo.c < msilo.c.patch patching file msilo.c Hunk #1 FAILED at 325. 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file msilo.c.rej ser@sen:~/src/ser-2.0/modules/msilo$ cat msilo.c.patch --- msilo.c Mon May 14 15:28:46 2007 +0200 +++ msilo.c Mon May 14 17:22:27 2007 +0200 @@ -325,9 +325,9 @@ goto error; } mode = str1[0] - '0';
if (str2) {
next_hop.len = strlen(str2);if (next_hop.len) { next_hop.s = str2;
next_hop.len = strlen(str2); } if (get_to_uid(&uid, msg) < 0) {Cheers tomasz
> You can try apply patch like this: > diff -r f576f4aff98e modules/msilo/msilo.c > --- a/modules/msilo/msilo.c Mon May 14 15:28:46 2007 +0200 > +++ b/modules/msilo/msilo.c Mon May 14 17:22:27 2007 +0200 > @@ -325,9 +325,9 @@ static int m_store(struct sip_msg* msg, > goto error; > } > mode = str1[0] - '0'; > - if (str2) { > + next_hop.len = strlen(str2); > + if (next_hop.len) { > next_hop.s = str2; > - next_hop.len = strlen(str2); > } > > if (get_to_uid(&uid, msg) < 0) { > > And please fill bug report at tracker. > Michal > > On Po, 2007-05-14 at 15:35 +0200, tzieleniewski wrote: > > Hi, > > > > When I try to store message in the database I get the following errors in the syslog (There are no messages stored in the database): > > > > May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: ERROR: parse_uri: uri too short: <> (0) > > May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: ERROR: uri2dst: bad_uri: > > May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: t_uac: no socket found > > > > And here is ser.cfg: > > xlog("L_INFO", " route[INBOUND]: (m_store (0, )) \n"); > > if (m_store ("0", "")) > > { > > xlog("L_INFO", " route[INBOUND]: offline message stored \n"); > > xlog("L_INFO", " route[INBOUND]: (!t_reply(202,Accepted) \n"); > > if (!t_reply("202", "Accepted")) > > { > > xlog("L_INFO", " route[INBOUND]: sl_reply_error() \n"); > > sl_reply_error(); > > } > > } > > > > the error appears in the following place accordin to my logging: > > May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: route[INBOUND]: (m_store (0, )) > > May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: ERROR: parse_uri: uri too short: <> (0) > > May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: ERROR: uri2dst: bad_uri: > > May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: t_uac: no socket found > > May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: route[INBOUND]: offline message stored > > May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: route[INBOUND]: (!t_reply(202,Accepted) > > May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: route[INBOUND]: drop <MESSAGE> sip:hulk@voip.rd.touk.pl > > > > Below is the Message transaction sent through SER: > > > > U 2007/05/14 15:26:40.746835 192.168.0.165:7089 -> 192.168.0.165:5060 > > MESSAGE sip:hulk@voip.rd.touk.pl SIP/2.0. > > CSeq: 64 MESSAGE. > > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.0.165:7089;branch=z9hG4bK24d4276b-8c00-dc11-982b-00148539376e;rport. > > From: "Sen" sip:sen@voip.rd.touk.pl;tag=a0d0276b-8c00-dc11-982b-00148539376e. > > Call-ID: 32c6276b-8c00-dc11-982b-00148539376e@sen. > > To: "hulk@" sip:hulk@voip.rd.touk.pl. > > Allow: INVITE,ACK,OPTIONS,BYE,CANCEL,NOTIFY,REFER,MESSAGE. > > Content-Type: text/plain;charset=UTF-8. > > Content-Length: 12. > > Max-Forwards: 70. > > . > > test message > > # > > U 2007/05/14 15:26:40.790793 192.168.0.165:5060 -> 192.168.0.165:7089 > > SIP/2.0 202 Accepted. > > CSeq: 64 MESSAGE. > > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.0.165:7089;branch=z9hG4bK24d4276b-8c00-dc11-982b-00148539376e;rport=7089. > > From: "Sen" sip:sen@voip.rd.touk.pl;tag=a0d0276b-8c00-dc11-982b-00148539376e. > > Call-ID: 32c6276b-8c00-dc11-982b-00148539376e@sen. > > To: "hulk@" sip:hulk@voip.rd.touk.pl;tag=a6a1c5f60faecf035a1ae5b6e96e979a-fd05. > > Server: Sip EXpress router (2.0.0-rc1 (x86_64/linux)). > > Content-Length: 0. > > Warning: 392 192.168.0.165:5060 "Noisy feedback tells: pid=5853 req_src_ip=192.168.0.165 req_src_port=7089 in_uri=sip:hulk@voip.rd.touk.pl out_uri=sip:hulk@voip.rd.touk.pl via_cnt==1". > > . > > > > Thanks for any feedback! > > Cheers > > Tomasz > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Serusers mailing list > > Serusers@lists.iptel.org > > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers >
Serusers mailing list Serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Great, thanks a lot! I will close the bug now... Vaclav
On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 01:03:59PM +0200, tzieleniewski wrote:
Ive checked out from CVS, tested without optional parameter and it works fine:)
Thanks Cheers Tomasz
Hi, thanks.
I have corrected the code in CVS. Please could you try it from there? I did the 'next_hop' parameter of msilo functions optional - thus instead of empty string you should omit the parameter [like m_dump() instead of m_dump("")]. Thanks a lot.
with regards, Vaclav
On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 11:56:49AM +0200, tzieleniewski wrote:
Hi,
Sure here they are: #modparam("msilo","registrar","sip:registrar@voip.touk.pl") modparam("msilo", "db_table", "silo") modparam("msilo", "expire_time", 259200) # 72h - 3 days modparam("msilo", "check_time", 30) modparam("msilo", "clean_period", 5) modparam("msilo", "use_contact", 0)
Cheers
Tomasz, it is strange, but it works for me without any patches. Please, could you send me your msilo module parameters?
thanks
VaclavOn Wed, May 16, 2007 at 10:28:29AM +0200, tzieleniewski wrote:
Thanks michal,
I did it and it worked after patch there appeared an analogous error in the m_dump(..) function in the msilo.c I made the similar correction and now everything works fine. I attached my patch for both things:)
Cheers tomasz
Hi, try run patch with one more parameter -l (or --ignore-whitespace). I will attach the patch instead putting it inline next time.
Michal
On St, 2007-05-16 at 09:56 +0200, tzieleniewski wrote: > Hi michal, > > I run the following patch but there was an error, can you please take a look. > my output below: > > ser@sen:~/src/ser-2.0/modules/msilo$ patch -p0 msilo.c < msilo.c.patch > patching file msilo.c > Hunk #1 FAILED at 325. > 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file msilo.c.rej > ser@sen:~/src/ser-2.0/modules/msilo$ cat msilo.c.patch > --- msilo.c Mon May 14 15:28:46 2007 +0200 > +++ msilo.c Mon May 14 17:22:27 2007 +0200 > @@ -325,9 +325,9 @@ > goto error; > } > mode = str1[0] - '0'; > - if (str2) { > + next_hop.len = strlen(str2); > + if (next_hop.len) { > next_hop.s = str2; > - next_hop.len = strlen(str2); > } > > if (get_to_uid(&uid, msg) < 0) { > > Cheers tomasz > > > You can try apply patch like this: > > diff -r f576f4aff98e modules/msilo/msilo.c > > --- a/modules/msilo/msilo.c Mon May 14 15:28:46 2007 +0200 > > +++ b/modules/msilo/msilo.c Mon May 14 17:22:27 2007 +0200 > > @@ -325,9 +325,9 @@ static int m_store(struct sip_msg* msg, > > goto error; > > } > > mode = str1[0] - '0'; > > - if (str2) { > > + next_hop.len = strlen(str2); > > + if (next_hop.len) { > > next_hop.s = str2; > > - next_hop.len = strlen(str2); > > } > > > > if (get_to_uid(&uid, msg) < 0) { > > > > And please fill bug report at tracker. > > Michal > > > > On Po, 2007-05-14 at 15:35 +0200, tzieleniewski wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > When I try to store message in the database I get the following errors in the syslog (There are no messages stored in the database): > > > > > > May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: ERROR: parse_uri: uri too short: <> (0) > > > May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: ERROR: uri2dst: bad_uri: > > > May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: t_uac: no socket found > > > > > > And here is ser.cfg: > > > xlog("L_INFO", " route[INBOUND]: (m_store (0, )) \n"); > > > if (m_store ("0", "")) > > > { > > > xlog("L_INFO", " route[INBOUND]: offline message stored \n"); > > > xlog("L_INFO", " route[INBOUND]: (!t_reply(202,Accepted) \n"); > > > if (!t_reply("202", "Accepted")) > > > { > > > xlog("L_INFO", " route[INBOUND]: sl_reply_error() \n"); > > > sl_reply_error(); > > > } > > > } > > > > > > the error appears in the following place accordin to my logging: > > > May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: route[INBOUND]: (m_store (0, )) > > > May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: ERROR: parse_uri: uri too short: <> (0) > > > May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: ERROR: uri2dst: bad_uri: > > > May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: t_uac: no socket found > > > May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: route[INBOUND]: offline message stored > > > May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: route[INBOUND]: (!t_reply(202,Accepted) > > > May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: route[INBOUND]: drop <MESSAGE> sip:hulk@voip.rd.touk.pl > > > > > > Below is the Message transaction sent through SER: > > > > > > U 2007/05/14 15:26:40.746835 192.168.0.165:7089 -> 192.168.0.165:5060 > > > MESSAGE sip:hulk@voip.rd.touk.pl SIP/2.0. > > > CSeq: 64 MESSAGE. > > > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.0.165:7089;branch=z9hG4bK24d4276b-8c00-dc11-982b-00148539376e;rport. > > > From: "Sen" sip:sen@voip.rd.touk.pl;tag=a0d0276b-8c00-dc11-982b-00148539376e. > > > Call-ID: 32c6276b-8c00-dc11-982b-00148539376e@sen. > > > To: "hulk@" sip:hulk@voip.rd.touk.pl. > > > Allow: INVITE,ACK,OPTIONS,BYE,CANCEL,NOTIFY,REFER,MESSAGE. > > > Content-Type: text/plain;charset=UTF-8. > > > Content-Length: 12. > > > Max-Forwards: 70. > > > . > > > test message > > > # > > > U 2007/05/14 15:26:40.790793 192.168.0.165:5060 -> 192.168.0.165:7089 > > > SIP/2.0 202 Accepted. > > > CSeq: 64 MESSAGE. > > > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.0.165:7089;branch=z9hG4bK24d4276b-8c00-dc11-982b-00148539376e;rport=7089. > > > From: "Sen" sip:sen@voip.rd.touk.pl;tag=a0d0276b-8c00-dc11-982b-00148539376e. > > > Call-ID: 32c6276b-8c00-dc11-982b-00148539376e@sen. > > > To: "hulk@" sip:hulk@voip.rd.touk.pl;tag=a6a1c5f60faecf035a1ae5b6e96e979a-fd05. > > > Server: Sip EXpress router (2.0.0-rc1 (x86_64/linux)). > > > Content-Length: 0. > > > Warning: 392 192.168.0.165:5060 "Noisy feedback tells: pid=5853 req_src_ip=192.168.0.165 req_src_port=7089 in_uri=sip:hulk@voip.rd.touk.pl out_uri=sip:hulk@voip.rd.touk.pl via_cnt==1". > > > . > > > > > > Thanks for any feedback! > > > Cheers > > > Tomasz > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Serusers mailing list > > > Serusers@lists.iptel.org > > > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers > >
Serusers mailing list Serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Hi Vaclav
I tested again and unfortunately there is still a problem. (testes on the latest CVS sources for rel_2_0_0) After I invoke m_dump() without any parameters SER brakes down:
May 24 11:09:24 rd ser[13974]: route[REGISTRAR_DB_AUTH]: (m_dump()) May 24 11:09:24 rd ser[13992]: ERROR: receive_fd: EOF on 16 May 24 11:09:24 rd ser[13969]: child process 13974 exited by a signal 11 May 24 11:09:24 rd ser[13969]: core was not generated May 24 11:09:24 rd ser[13969]: INFO: terminating due to SIGCHLD May 24 11:09:24 rd ser[13980]: INFO: signal 15 received
Cheers Tomasz
Ive checked out from CVS, tested without optional parameter and it works fine:)
Thanks Cheers Tomasz
Hi, thanks.
I have corrected the code in CVS. Please could you try it from there? I did the 'next_hop' parameter of msilo functions optional - thus instead of empty string you should omit the parameter [like m_dump() instead of m_dump("")]. Thanks a lot.
with regards, Vaclav
On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 11:56:49AM +0200, tzieleniewski wrote:
Hi,
Sure here they are: #modparam("msilo","registrar","sip:registrar@voip.touk.pl") modparam("msilo", "db_table", "silo") modparam("msilo", "expire_time", 259200) # 72h - 3 days modparam("msilo", "check_time", 30) modparam("msilo", "clean_period", 5) modparam("msilo", "use_contact", 0)
Cheers
Tomasz, it is strange, but it works for me without any patches. Please, could you send me your msilo module parameters?
thanks
VaclavOn Wed, May 16, 2007 at 10:28:29AM +0200, tzieleniewski wrote:
Thanks michal,
I did it and it worked after patch there appeared an analogous error in the m_dump(..) function in the msilo.c I made the similar correction and now everything works fine. I attached my patch for both things:)
Cheers tomasz
Hi, try run patch with one more parameter -l (or --ignore-whitespace). I will attach the patch instead putting it inline next time.
Michal
On St, 2007-05-16 at 09:56 +0200, tzieleniewski wrote: > Hi michal, > > I run the following patch but there was an error, can you please take a look. > my output below: > > ser@sen:~/src/ser-2.0/modules/msilo$ patch -p0 msilo.c < msilo.c.patch > patching file msilo.c > Hunk #1 FAILED at 325. > 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file msilo.c.rej > ser@sen:~/src/ser-2.0/modules/msilo$ cat msilo.c.patch > --- msilo.c Mon May 14 15:28:46 2007 +0200 > +++ msilo.c Mon May 14 17:22:27 2007 +0200 > @@ -325,9 +325,9 @@ > goto error; > } > mode = str1[0] - '0'; > - if (str2) { > + next_hop.len = strlen(str2); > + if (next_hop.len) { > next_hop.s = str2; > - next_hop.len = strlen(str2); > } > > if (get_to_uid(&uid, msg) < 0) { > > Cheers tomasz > > > You can try apply patch like this: > > diff -r f576f4aff98e modules/msilo/msilo.c > > --- a/modules/msilo/msilo.c Mon May 14 15:28:46 2007 +0200 > > +++ b/modules/msilo/msilo.c Mon May 14 17:22:27 2007 +0200 > > @@ -325,9 +325,9 @@ static int m_store(struct sip_msg* msg, > > goto error; > > } > > mode = str1[0] - '0'; > > - if (str2) { > > + next_hop.len = strlen(str2); > > + if (next_hop.len) { > > next_hop.s = str2; > > - next_hop.len = strlen(str2); > > } > > > > if (get_to_uid(&uid, msg) < 0) { > > > > And please fill bug report at tracker. > > Michal > > > > On Po, 2007-05-14 at 15:35 +0200, tzieleniewski wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > When I try to store message in the database I get the following errors in the syslog (There are no messages stored in the database): > > > > > > May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: ERROR: parse_uri: uri too short: <> (0) > > > May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: ERROR: uri2dst: bad_uri: > > > May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: t_uac: no socket found > > > > > > And here is ser.cfg: > > > xlog("L_INFO", " route[INBOUND]: (m_store (0, )) \n"); > > > if (m_store ("0", "")) > > > { > > > xlog("L_INFO", " route[INBOUND]: offline message stored \n"); > > > xlog("L_INFO", " route[INBOUND]: (!t_reply(202,Accepted) \n"); > > > if (!t_reply("202", "Accepted")) > > > { > > > xlog("L_INFO", " route[INBOUND]: sl_reply_error() \n"); > > > sl_reply_error(); > > > } > > > } > > > > > > the error appears in the following place accordin to my logging: > > > May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: route[INBOUND]: (m_store (0, )) > > > May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: ERROR: parse_uri: uri too short: <> (0) > > > May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: ERROR: uri2dst: bad_uri: > > > May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: t_uac: no socket found > > > May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: route[INBOUND]: offline message stored > > > May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: route[INBOUND]: (!t_reply(202,Accepted) > > > May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: route[INBOUND]: drop <MESSAGE> sip:hulk@voip.rd.touk.pl > > > > > > Below is the Message transaction sent through SER: > > > > > > U 2007/05/14 15:26:40.746835 192.168.0.165:7089 -> 192.168.0.165:5060 > > > MESSAGE sip:hulk@voip.rd.touk.pl SIP/2.0. > > > CSeq: 64 MESSAGE. > > > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.0.165:7089;branch=z9hG4bK24d4276b-8c00-dc11-982b-00148539376e;rport. > > > From: "Sen" sip:sen@voip.rd.touk.pl;tag=a0d0276b-8c00-dc11-982b-00148539376e. > > > Call-ID: 32c6276b-8c00-dc11-982b-00148539376e@sen. > > > To: "hulk@" sip:hulk@voip.rd.touk.pl. > > > Allow: INVITE,ACK,OPTIONS,BYE,CANCEL,NOTIFY,REFER,MESSAGE. > > > Content-Type: text/plain;charset=UTF-8. > > > Content-Length: 12. > > > Max-Forwards: 70. > > > . > > > test message > > > # > > > U 2007/05/14 15:26:40.790793 192.168.0.165:5060 -> 192.168.0.165:7089 > > > SIP/2.0 202 Accepted. > > > CSeq: 64 MESSAGE. > > > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.0.165:7089;branch=z9hG4bK24d4276b-8c00-dc11-982b-00148539376e;rport=7089. > > > From: "Sen" sip:sen@voip.rd.touk.pl;tag=a0d0276b-8c00-dc11-982b-00148539376e. > > > Call-ID: 32c6276b-8c00-dc11-982b-00148539376e@sen. > > > To: "hulk@" sip:hulk@voip.rd.touk.pl;tag=a6a1c5f60faecf035a1ae5b6e96e979a-fd05. > > > Server: Sip EXpress router (2.0.0-rc1 (x86_64/linux)). > > > Content-Length: 0. > > > Warning: 392 192.168.0.165:5060 "Noisy feedback tells: pid=5853 req_src_ip=192.168.0.165 req_src_port=7089 in_uri=sip:hulk@voip.rd.touk.pl out_uri=sip:hulk@voip.rd.touk.pl via_cnt==1". > > > . > > > > > > Thanks for any feedback! > > > Cheers > > > Tomasz > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Serusers mailing list > > > Serusers@lists.iptel.org > > > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers > >
Serusers mailing list Serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Hi Tomasz, thanks, I will look on it. Vaclav
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 11:36:37AM +0200, tzieleniewski wrote:
Hi Vaclav
I tested again and unfortunately there is still a problem. (testes on the latest CVS sources for rel_2_0_0) After I invoke m_dump() without any parameters SER brakes down:
May 24 11:09:24 rd ser[13974]: route[REGISTRAR_DB_AUTH]: (m_dump()) May 24 11:09:24 rd ser[13992]: ERROR: receive_fd: EOF on 16 May 24 11:09:24 rd ser[13969]: child process 13974 exited by a signal 11 May 24 11:09:24 rd ser[13969]: core was not generated May 24 11:09:24 rd ser[13969]: INFO: terminating due to SIGCHLD May 24 11:09:24 rd ser[13980]: INFO: signal 15 received
Cheers Tomasz
Ive checked out from CVS, tested without optional parameter and it works fine:)
Thanks Cheers Tomasz
Hi, thanks.
I have corrected the code in CVS. Please could you try it from there? I did the 'next_hop' parameter of msilo functions optional - thus instead of empty string you should omit the parameter [like m_dump() instead of m_dump("")]. Thanks a lot.
with regards, Vaclav
On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 11:56:49AM +0200, tzieleniewski wrote:
Hi,
Sure here they are: #modparam("msilo","registrar","sip:registrar@voip.touk.pl") modparam("msilo", "db_table", "silo") modparam("msilo", "expire_time", 259200) # 72h - 3 days modparam("msilo", "check_time", 30) modparam("msilo", "clean_period", 5) modparam("msilo", "use_contact", 0)
Cheers
Tomasz, it is strange, but it works for me without any patches. Please, could you send me your msilo module parameters?
thanks
VaclavOn Wed, May 16, 2007 at 10:28:29AM +0200, tzieleniewski wrote:
Thanks michal,
I did it and it worked after patch there appeared an analogous error in the m_dump(..) function in the msilo.c I made the similar correction and now everything works fine. I attached my patch for both things:)
Cheers tomasz
> Hi, > try run patch with one more parameter -l (or --ignore-whitespace). > I will attach the patch instead putting it inline next time. > > Michal > > On St, 2007-05-16 at 09:56 +0200, tzieleniewski wrote: > > Hi michal, > > > > I run the following patch but there was an error, can you please take a look. > > my output below: > > > > ser@sen:~/src/ser-2.0/modules/msilo$ patch -p0 msilo.c < msilo.c.patch > > patching file msilo.c > > Hunk #1 FAILED at 325. > > 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file msilo.c.rej > > ser@sen:~/src/ser-2.0/modules/msilo$ cat msilo.c.patch > > --- msilo.c Mon May 14 15:28:46 2007 +0200 > > +++ msilo.c Mon May 14 17:22:27 2007 +0200 > > @@ -325,9 +325,9 @@ > > goto error; > > } > > mode = str1[0] - '0'; > > - if (str2) { > > + next_hop.len = strlen(str2); > > + if (next_hop.len) { > > next_hop.s = str2; > > - next_hop.len = strlen(str2); > > } > > > > if (get_to_uid(&uid, msg) < 0) { > > > > Cheers tomasz > > > > > You can try apply patch like this: > > > diff -r f576f4aff98e modules/msilo/msilo.c > > > --- a/modules/msilo/msilo.c Mon May 14 15:28:46 2007 +0200 > > > +++ b/modules/msilo/msilo.c Mon May 14 17:22:27 2007 +0200 > > > @@ -325,9 +325,9 @@ static int m_store(struct sip_msg* msg, > > > goto error; > > > } > > > mode = str1[0] - '0'; > > > - if (str2) { > > > + next_hop.len = strlen(str2); > > > + if (next_hop.len) { > > > next_hop.s = str2; > > > - next_hop.len = strlen(str2); > > > } > > > > > > if (get_to_uid(&uid, msg) < 0) { > > > > > > And please fill bug report at tracker. > > > Michal > > > > > > On Po, 2007-05-14 at 15:35 +0200, tzieleniewski wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > When I try to store message in the database I get the following errors in the syslog (There are no messages stored in the database): > > > > > > > > May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: ERROR: parse_uri: uri too short: <> (0) > > > > May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: ERROR: uri2dst: bad_uri: > > > > May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: t_uac: no socket found > > > > > > > > And here is ser.cfg: > > > > xlog("L_INFO", " route[INBOUND]: (m_store (0, )) \n"); > > > > if (m_store ("0", "")) > > > > { > > > > xlog("L_INFO", " route[INBOUND]: offline message stored \n"); > > > > xlog("L_INFO", " route[INBOUND]: (!t_reply(202,Accepted) \n"); > > > > if (!t_reply("202", "Accepted")) > > > > { > > > > xlog("L_INFO", " route[INBOUND]: sl_reply_error() \n"); > > > > sl_reply_error(); > > > > } > > > > } > > > > > > > > the error appears in the following place accordin to my logging: > > > > May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: route[INBOUND]: (m_store (0, )) > > > > May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: ERROR: parse_uri: uri too short: <> (0) > > > > May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: ERROR: uri2dst: bad_uri: > > > > May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: t_uac: no socket found > > > > May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: route[INBOUND]: offline message stored > > > > May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: route[INBOUND]: (!t_reply(202,Accepted) > > > > May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: route[INBOUND]: drop <MESSAGE> sip:hulk@voip.rd.touk.pl > > > > > > > > Below is the Message transaction sent through SER: > > > > > > > > U 2007/05/14 15:26:40.746835 192.168.0.165:7089 -> 192.168.0.165:5060 > > > > MESSAGE sip:hulk@voip.rd.touk.pl SIP/2.0. > > > > CSeq: 64 MESSAGE. > > > > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.0.165:7089;branch=z9hG4bK24d4276b-8c00-dc11-982b-00148539376e;rport. > > > > From: "Sen" sip:sen@voip.rd.touk.pl;tag=a0d0276b-8c00-dc11-982b-00148539376e. > > > > Call-ID: 32c6276b-8c00-dc11-982b-00148539376e@sen. > > > > To: "hulk@" sip:hulk@voip.rd.touk.pl. > > > > Allow: INVITE,ACK,OPTIONS,BYE,CANCEL,NOTIFY,REFER,MESSAGE. > > > > Content-Type: text/plain;charset=UTF-8. > > > > Content-Length: 12. > > > > Max-Forwards: 70. > > > > . > > > > test message > > > > # > > > > U 2007/05/14 15:26:40.790793 192.168.0.165:5060 -> 192.168.0.165:7089 > > > > SIP/2.0 202 Accepted. > > > > CSeq: 64 MESSAGE. > > > > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.0.165:7089;branch=z9hG4bK24d4276b-8c00-dc11-982b-00148539376e;rport=7089. > > > > From: "Sen" sip:sen@voip.rd.touk.pl;tag=a0d0276b-8c00-dc11-982b-00148539376e. > > > > Call-ID: 32c6276b-8c00-dc11-982b-00148539376e@sen. > > > > To: "hulk@" sip:hulk@voip.rd.touk.pl;tag=a6a1c5f60faecf035a1ae5b6e96e979a-fd05. > > > > Server: Sip EXpress router (2.0.0-rc1 (x86_64/linux)). > > > > Content-Length: 0. > > > > Warning: 392 192.168.0.165:5060 "Noisy feedback tells: pid=5853 req_src_ip=192.168.0.165 req_src_port=7089 in_uri=sip:hulk@voip.rd.touk.pl out_uri=sip:hulk@voip.rd.touk.pl via_cnt==1". > > > > . > > > > > > > > Thanks for any feedback! > > > > Cheers > > > > Tomasz > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > Serusers mailing list > > > > Serusers@lists.iptel.org > > > > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers > > > >
Serusers mailing list Serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Hi Tomasz, I'm very sorry but I can't reproduce the problem. Please, could you try to run ser with parameter -w some_directory? This should cause coredump into some_diretory. Then please run
gdb /path/to/ser path/to/core
and "bt" in gdb should write where the problem is - could you send its output to me?
thanks a lot Vaclav
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 11:36:37AM +0200, tzieleniewski wrote:
Hi Vaclav
I tested again and unfortunately there is still a problem. (testes on the latest CVS sources for rel_2_0_0) After I invoke m_dump() without any parameters SER brakes down:
May 24 11:09:24 rd ser[13974]: route[REGISTRAR_DB_AUTH]: (m_dump()) May 24 11:09:24 rd ser[13992]: ERROR: receive_fd: EOF on 16 May 24 11:09:24 rd ser[13969]: child process 13974 exited by a signal 11 May 24 11:09:24 rd ser[13969]: core was not generated May 24 11:09:24 rd ser[13969]: INFO: terminating due to SIGCHLD May 24 11:09:24 rd ser[13980]: INFO: signal 15 received
Cheers Tomasz
Ive checked out from CVS, tested without optional parameter and it works fine:)
Thanks Cheers Tomasz
Hi, thanks.
I have corrected the code in CVS. Please could you try it from there? I did the 'next_hop' parameter of msilo functions optional - thus instead of empty string you should omit the parameter [like m_dump() instead of m_dump("")]. Thanks a lot.
with regards, Vaclav
On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 11:56:49AM +0200, tzieleniewski wrote:
Hi,
Sure here they are: #modparam("msilo","registrar","sip:registrar@voip.touk.pl") modparam("msilo", "db_table", "silo") modparam("msilo", "expire_time", 259200) # 72h - 3 days modparam("msilo", "check_time", 30) modparam("msilo", "clean_period", 5) modparam("msilo", "use_contact", 0)
Cheers
Tomasz, it is strange, but it works for me without any patches. Please, could you send me your msilo module parameters?
thanks
VaclavOn Wed, May 16, 2007 at 10:28:29AM +0200, tzieleniewski wrote:
Thanks michal,
I did it and it worked after patch there appeared an analogous error in the m_dump(..) function in the msilo.c I made the similar correction and now everything works fine. I attached my patch for both things:)
Cheers tomasz
> Hi, > try run patch with one more parameter -l (or --ignore-whitespace). > I will attach the patch instead putting it inline next time. > > Michal > > On St, 2007-05-16 at 09:56 +0200, tzieleniewski wrote: > > Hi michal, > > > > I run the following patch but there was an error, can you please take a look. > > my output below: > > > > ser@sen:~/src/ser-2.0/modules/msilo$ patch -p0 msilo.c < msilo.c.patch > > patching file msilo.c > > Hunk #1 FAILED at 325. > > 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file msilo.c.rej > > ser@sen:~/src/ser-2.0/modules/msilo$ cat msilo.c.patch > > --- msilo.c Mon May 14 15:28:46 2007 +0200 > > +++ msilo.c Mon May 14 17:22:27 2007 +0200 > > @@ -325,9 +325,9 @@ > > goto error; > > } > > mode = str1[0] - '0'; > > - if (str2) { > > + next_hop.len = strlen(str2); > > + if (next_hop.len) { > > next_hop.s = str2; > > - next_hop.len = strlen(str2); > > } > > > > if (get_to_uid(&uid, msg) < 0) { > > > > Cheers tomasz > > > > > You can try apply patch like this: > > > diff -r f576f4aff98e modules/msilo/msilo.c > > > --- a/modules/msilo/msilo.c Mon May 14 15:28:46 2007 +0200 > > > +++ b/modules/msilo/msilo.c Mon May 14 17:22:27 2007 +0200 > > > @@ -325,9 +325,9 @@ static int m_store(struct sip_msg* msg, > > > goto error; > > > } > > > mode = str1[0] - '0'; > > > - if (str2) { > > > + next_hop.len = strlen(str2); > > > + if (next_hop.len) { > > > next_hop.s = str2; > > > - next_hop.len = strlen(str2); > > > } > > > > > > if (get_to_uid(&uid, msg) < 0) { > > > > > > And please fill bug report at tracker. > > > Michal > > > > > > On Po, 2007-05-14 at 15:35 +0200, tzieleniewski wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > When I try to store message in the database I get the following errors in the syslog (There are no messages stored in the database): > > > > > > > > May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: ERROR: parse_uri: uri too short: <> (0) > > > > May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: ERROR: uri2dst: bad_uri: > > > > May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: t_uac: no socket found > > > > > > > > And here is ser.cfg: > > > > xlog("L_INFO", " route[INBOUND]: (m_store (0, )) \n"); > > > > if (m_store ("0", "")) > > > > { > > > > xlog("L_INFO", " route[INBOUND]: offline message stored \n"); > > > > xlog("L_INFO", " route[INBOUND]: (!t_reply(202,Accepted) \n"); > > > > if (!t_reply("202", "Accepted")) > > > > { > > > > xlog("L_INFO", " route[INBOUND]: sl_reply_error() \n"); > > > > sl_reply_error(); > > > > } > > > > } > > > > > > > > the error appears in the following place accordin to my logging: > > > > May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: route[INBOUND]: (m_store (0, )) > > > > May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: ERROR: parse_uri: uri too short: <> (0) > > > > May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: ERROR: uri2dst: bad_uri: > > > > May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: t_uac: no socket found > > > > May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: route[INBOUND]: offline message stored > > > > May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: route[INBOUND]: (!t_reply(202,Accepted) > > > > May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: route[INBOUND]: drop <MESSAGE> sip:hulk@voip.rd.touk.pl > > > > > > > > Below is the Message transaction sent through SER: > > > > > > > > U 2007/05/14 15:26:40.746835 192.168.0.165:7089 -> 192.168.0.165:5060 > > > > MESSAGE sip:hulk@voip.rd.touk.pl SIP/2.0. > > > > CSeq: 64 MESSAGE. > > > > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.0.165:7089;branch=z9hG4bK24d4276b-8c00-dc11-982b-00148539376e;rport. > > > > From: "Sen" sip:sen@voip.rd.touk.pl;tag=a0d0276b-8c00-dc11-982b-00148539376e. > > > > Call-ID: 32c6276b-8c00-dc11-982b-00148539376e@sen. > > > > To: "hulk@" sip:hulk@voip.rd.touk.pl. > > > > Allow: INVITE,ACK,OPTIONS,BYE,CANCEL,NOTIFY,REFER,MESSAGE. > > > > Content-Type: text/plain;charset=UTF-8. > > > > Content-Length: 12. > > > > Max-Forwards: 70. > > > > . > > > > test message > > > > # > > > > U 2007/05/14 15:26:40.790793 192.168.0.165:5060 -> 192.168.0.165:7089 > > > > SIP/2.0 202 Accepted. > > > > CSeq: 64 MESSAGE. > > > > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.0.165:7089;branch=z9hG4bK24d4276b-8c00-dc11-982b-00148539376e;rport=7089. > > > > From: "Sen" sip:sen@voip.rd.touk.pl;tag=a0d0276b-8c00-dc11-982b-00148539376e. > > > > Call-ID: 32c6276b-8c00-dc11-982b-00148539376e@sen. > > > > To: "hulk@" sip:hulk@voip.rd.touk.pl;tag=a6a1c5f60faecf035a1ae5b6e96e979a-fd05. > > > > Server: Sip EXpress router (2.0.0-rc1 (x86_64/linux)). > > > > Content-Length: 0. > > > > Warning: 392 192.168.0.165:5060 "Noisy feedback tells: pid=5853 req_src_ip=192.168.0.165 req_src_port=7089 in_uri=sip:hulk@voip.rd.touk.pl out_uri=sip:hulk@voip.rd.touk.pl via_cnt==1". > > > > . > > > > > > > > Thanks for any feedback! > > > > Cheers > > > > Tomasz > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > Serusers mailing list > > > > Serusers@lists.iptel.org > > > > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers > > > >
Serusers mailing list Serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
-
Michal Matyska -
tzieleniewski -
Vaclav Kubart