Hello, as Jiri suggested in another mail, if you haven't done it yet, is better to get the latest stable branch (rel_0_8_11) from CVS (see http://www.iptel.org/ser/cvs/) which is forked from v0.8.11 and has some updates and fixes.

}Daniel

On 10/30/2003 1:33 PM, schweizer laurent wrote:

Because ser 0.8.11 with redhat 9 is not always correctly started. see http://lists.iptel.org/pipermail/serusers/2003-October/003352.html

-----Original Message----- From: Daniel-Constantin Mierla [mailto:Daniel-Constantin.Mierla@fokus.fraunhofer.de] Sent: jeudi, 30. octobre 2003 13:21 To: schweizer laurent Cc: serusers@lists.iptel.org Subject: Re: [Serusers] some trouble with ser 0.8.11 / 0.8.11pre29

Hello, why do you need v0.8.11pre29? That version is an older prerelease and there were some fixes for RH9.0 which are now included in v0.8.11.

}Daniel

On 10/30/2003 1:07 PM, schweizer laurent wrote:

...

Hello,

I have some trouble with ser. First I have installed the 0.8.11 but I see that this version with red hat

9

...

is not always started correctly.

Then I have installed the version 0.8.11pre29, this version start correctly but I see that after a few hours the server does not send any responses.

Laurent

---

Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers