Hello,
as Jiri suggested in another mail, if you haven't done it yet, is better
to get the latest stable branch (rel_0_8_11) from CVS (see
http://www.iptel.org/ser/cvs/) which is forked from v0.8.11 and has some
updates and fixes.
}Daniel
On 10/30/2003 1:33 PM, schweizer laurent wrote:
Because ser 0.8.11 with redhat 9 is not always
correctly started.
see
http://lists.iptel.org/pipermail/serusers/2003-October/003352.html
-----Original Message-----
From: Daniel-Constantin Mierla
[mailto:Daniel-Constantin.Mierla@fokus.fraunhofer.de]
Sent: jeudi, 30. octobre 2003 13:21
To: schweizer laurent
Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
Subject: Re: [Serusers] some trouble with ser 0.8.11 / 0.8.11pre29
Hello,
why do you need v0.8.11pre29? That version is an older prerelease and
there were some fixes for RH9.0 which are now included in v0.8.11.
}Daniel
On 10/30/2003 1:07 PM, schweizer laurent wrote:
Hello,
I have some trouble with ser.
First I have installed the 0.8.11 but I see that this version with red hat
9
is not always started correctly.
Then I have installed the version 0.8.11pre29, this version start correctly
but I see that after a few hours the server does not send any responses.
Laurent
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers