Hi kamailio dev: I am writing a module to implement some features, my version is 4.1.2, I am not sure if it is a known issue, I found: 1. When I get a INVITE request with from/to like from:"display"aaa@sip.com, then I call tm's new_dlg_uas with the sip req, now the dlg's rem_uri set as value: "display"aaa@sip.com; 2. After that, when I need use the dlg to send BYE with tm's req_within with the above saved dlg, the print_to function will check the rem_uri's first value if "<" or not, now my uri has display name, so the outgoing BYE's to header becomes to:<"display"aaa@sip.com>, is it wrong? Should we check the last char in the rem_uri as ">"?
The detail code is : static inline char* print_to(char* w, dlg_t* dialog, struct cell* t) { t->to.s = w; t->to.len = TO_LEN + dialog->rem_uri.len + CRLF_LEN + ((dialog->rem_uri.s[0]!='<')?2:0);
memapp(w, TO, TO_LEN); if(dialog->rem_uri.s[0]!='<') memapp(w, "<", 1); memapp(w, dialog->rem_uri.s, dialog->rem_uri.len); if(dialog->rem_uri.s[0]!='<') memapp(w, ">", 1); ....
Hello,
your remarks seems legit -- if you send a patch, I will review and commit it. Otherwise, open an issue on bugh tracker and will be fixed soon.
Cheers, Daniel
On 17/09/14 10:06, dongwf wrote:
Hi kamailio dev: I am writing a module to implement some features, my version is 4.1.2, I am not sure if it is a known issue, I found:
- When I get a INVITE request with from/to like
from:"display"aaa@sip.com, then I call tm's new_dlg_uas with the sip req, now the dlg's rem_uri set as value: "display"aaa@sip.com; 2. After that, when I need use the dlg to send BYE with tm's req_within with the above saved dlg, the print_to function will check the rem_uri's first value if "<" or not, now my uri has display name, so the outgoing BYE's to header becomes to:<"display"aaa@sip.com>, is it wrong? Should we check the last char in the rem_uri as ">"?
The detail code is : static inline char* print_to(char* w, dlg_t* dialog, struct cell* t) { t->to.s = w; t->to.len = TO_LEN + dialog->rem_uri.len + CRLF_LEN + ((dialog->rem_uri.s[0]!='<')?2:0);
memapp(w, TO, TO_LEN);if(dialog->rem_uri.s[0]!='<') memapp(w, "<", 1); memapp(w, dialog->rem_uri.s, dialog->rem_uri.len); if(dialog->rem_uri.s[0]!='<') memapp(w, ">", 1); ....
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
Hi Daniel: I added my fixing in attached t_msgbuilder.c, please take a review, mainly change in build_uac_req, print_to and print_from, thanks!
At 2014-09-17 04:25:17, "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" miconda@gmail.com wrote: Hello,
your remarks seems legit -- if you send a patch, I will review and commit it. Otherwise, open an issue on bugh tracker and will be fixed soon. I tested the patch with my scenario, it works fine.
Cheers, Daniel
On 17/09/14 10:06, dongwf wrote:
Hi kamailio dev: I am writing a module to implement some features, my version is 4.1.2, I am not sure if it is a known issue, I found: 1. When I get a INVITE request with from/to like from:"display"aaa@sip.com, then I call tm's new_dlg_uas with the sip req, now the dlg's rem_uri set as value: "display"aaa@sip.com; 2. After that, when I need use the dlg to send BYE with tm's req_within with the above saved dlg, the print_to function will check the rem_uri's first value if "<" or not, now my uri has display name, so the outgoing BYE's to header becomes to:<"display"aaa@sip.com>, is it wrong? Should we check the last char in the rem_uri as ">"?
The detail code is : static inline char* print_to(char* w, dlg_t* dialog, struct cell* t) { t->to.s = w; t->to.len = TO_LEN + dialog->rem_uri.len + CRLF_LEN + ((dialog->rem_uri.s[0]!='<')?2:0);
memapp(w, TO, TO_LEN); if(dialog->rem_uri.s[0]!='<') memapp(w, "<", 1); memapp(w, dialog->rem_uri.s, dialog->rem_uri.len); if(dialog->rem_uri.s[0]!='<') memapp(w, ">", 1); ....
_______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.orghttp://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
Hello,
can you send the changes as patch (diff) file?
If you got kamailio from git, then you can do:
git diff > /path/to/file.patch
It is easier to review the changes and be sure we are not overwriting a new version of the file.
Cheers, Daniel
On 19/09/14 12:57, dongwf wrote:
Hi Daniel: I added my fixing in attached t_msgbuilder.c, please take a review, mainly change in build_uac_req, print_to and print_from, thanks!
At 2014-09-17 04:25:17, "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" miconda@gmail.com wrote:
Hello, your remarks seems legit -- if you send a patch, I will review and commit it. Otherwise, open an issue on bugh tracker and will be fixed soon. I tested the patch with my scenario, it works fine. Cheers, Daniel On 17/09/14 10:06, dongwf wrote:Hi kamailio dev: I am writing a module to implement some features, my version is 4.1.2, I am not sure if it is a known issue, I found: 1. When I get a INVITE request with from/to like from:"display"<aaa@sip.com>, then I call tm's new_dlg_uas with the sip req, now the dlg's rem_uri set as value: "display"<aaa@sip.com>; 2. After that, when I need use the dlg to send BYE with tm's req_within with the above saved dlg, the print_to function will check the rem_uri's first value if "<" or not, now my uri has display name, so the outgoing BYE's to header becomes to:<"display"<aaa@sip.com>>, is it wrong? Should we check the last char in the rem_uri as ">"? The detail code is : static inline char* print_to(char* w, dlg_t* dialog, struct cell* t) { t->to.s = w; t->to.len = TO_LEN + dialog->rem_uri.len + CRLF_LEN + ((dialog->rem_uri.s[0]!='<')?2:0); memapp(w, TO, TO_LEN); if(dialog->rem_uri.s[0]!='<') memapp(w, "<", 1); memapp(w, dialog->rem_uri.s, dialog->rem_uri.len); if(dialog->rem_uri.s[0]!='<') memapp(w, ">", 1); .... _______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users-- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda -http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Next Kamailio Advanced Trainings 2014 -http://www.asipto.com Sep 22-25, Berlin, Germany
Hi: Sorry for the unconvinient, I didn't use git, I use diff tool generated diff for t_msgbuilder.c as below, is it ok for you?
1400c1400 < + ((dialog->rem_uri.s[0]!='<')?2:0); ---
+ ((dialog->rem_uri.s[dialog->rem_uri.len - 1]!='>')?2:0);
1403c1403 < if(dialog->rem_uri.s[0]!='<') memapp(w, "<", 1); ---
if(dialog->rem_uri.s[dialog->rem_uri.len - 1]!='>') memapp(w, "<", 1);
1405c1405 < if(dialog->rem_uri.s[0]!='<') memapp(w, ">", 1); ---
if(dialog->rem_uri.s[dialog->rem_uri.len - 1]!='>') memapp(w, ">", 1);
1425c1425 < + ((dialog->loc_uri.s[0]!='<')?2:0); ---
+ ((dialog->loc_uri.s[dialog->loc_uri.len - 1]!='>')?2:0);
1428c1428 < if(dialog->loc_uri.s[0]!='<') memapp(w, "<", 1); ---
if(dialog->loc_uri.s[dialog->loc_uri.len - 1]!='>') memapp(w, "<", 1);
1430c1430 < if(dialog->loc_uri.s[0]!='<') memapp(w, ">", 1); ---
if(dialog->loc_uri.s[dialog->loc_uri.len -1]!='>') memapp(w, ">", 1);
1551c1551 < if(dialog->rem_uri.s[0]!='<') *len += 2; /* To-URI < > */ ---
if(dialog->rem_uri.s[dialog->rem_uri.len - 1]!='>') *len += 2; /* To-URI < > */
1554c1554 < if(dialog->loc_uri.s[0]!='<') *len += 2; /* From-URI < > */ ---
if(dialog->loc_uri.s[dialog->loc_uri.len - 1]!='>') *len += 2; /* From-URI < > */
At 2014-09-20 00:03:32, "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" miconda@gmail.com wrote: Hello,
can you send the changes as patch (diff) file?
If you got kamailio from git, then you can do:
git diff > /path/to/file.patch
It is easier to review the changes and be sure we are not overwriting a new version of the file.
Cheers, Daniel
On 19/09/14 12:57, dongwf wrote:
Hi Daniel: I added my fixing in attached t_msgbuilder.c, please take a review, mainly change in build_uac_req, print_to and print_from, thanks!
At 2014-09-17 04:25:17, "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" miconda@gmail.com wrote: Hello,
your remarks seems legit -- if you send a patch, I will review and commit it. Otherwise, open an issue on bugh tracker and will be fixed soon. I tested the patch with my scenario, it works fine.
Cheers, Daniel
On 17/09/14 10:06, dongwf wrote:
Hi kamailio dev: I am writing a module to implement some features, my version is 4.1.2, I am not sure if it is a known issue, I found: 1. When I get a INVITE request with from/to like from:"display"aaa@sip.com, then I call tm's new_dlg_uas with the sip req, now the dlg's rem_uri set as value: "display"aaa@sip.com; 2. After that, when I need use the dlg to send BYE with tm's req_within with the above saved dlg, the print_to function will check the rem_uri's first value if "<" or not, now my uri has display name, so the outgoing BYE's to header becomes to:<"display"aaa@sip.com>, is it wrong? Should we check the last char in the rem_uri as ">"?
The detail code is : static inline char* print_to(char* w, dlg_t* dialog, struct cell* t) { t->to.s = w; t->to.len = TO_LEN + dialog->rem_uri.len + CRLF_LEN + ((dialog->rem_uri.s[0]!='<')?2:0);
memapp(w, TO, TO_LEN); if(dialog->rem_uri.s[0]!='<') memapp(w, "<", 1); memapp(w, dialog->rem_uri.s, dialog->rem_uri.len); if(dialog->rem_uri.s[0]!='<') memapp(w, ">", 1); ....
_______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.orghttp://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
Hello,
I applied the patch copying manually the changes -- you can try the master branch to see if all works as expected. Son it will get backported to stable branches.
For future reference, you should use:
diff -u oldfile newfile >/tmp/file.patch
Then send the file.patch as attachment. Then one can save it locally from email and use:
patch -pX<file.patch
to apply the changes.
Thanks for troubleshooting and patching the issue.
Cheers, Daniel
On 22/09/14 12:27, dongwf wrote:
Hi: Sorry for the unconvinient, I didn't use git, I use diff tool generated diff for t_msgbuilder.c as below, is it ok for you?
1400c1400
< + ((dialog->rem_uri.s[0]!='<')?2:0);
+ ((dialog->rem_uri.s[dialog->rem_uri.len - 1]!='>')?2:0);1403c1403
< if(dialog->rem_uri.s[0]!='<') memapp(w, "<", 1);
if(dialog->rem_uri.s[dialog->rem_uri.len - 1]!='>') memapp(w, "<", 1);
1405c1405
< if(dialog->rem_uri.s[0]!='<') memapp(w, ">", 1);
if(dialog->rem_uri.s[dialog->rem_uri.len - 1]!='>') memapp(w, ">", 1);
1425c1425
< + ((dialog->loc_uri.s[0]!='<')?2:0);
+ ((dialog->loc_uri.s[dialog->loc_uri.len - 1]!='>')?2:0);1428c1428
< if(dialog->loc_uri.s[0]!='<') memapp(w, "<", 1);
if(dialog->loc_uri.s[dialog->loc_uri.len - 1]!='>') memapp(w, "<", 1);
1430c1430
< if(dialog->loc_uri.s[0]!='<') memapp(w, ">", 1);
if(dialog->loc_uri.s[dialog->loc_uri.len -1]!='>') memapp(w, ">", 1);
1551c1551
< if(dialog->rem_uri.s[0]!='<') *len += 2; /* To-URI < > */
if(dialog->rem_uri.s[dialog->rem_uri.len - 1]!='>') *len += 2; /*
To-URI < > */ 1554c1554
< if(dialog->loc_uri.s[0]!='<') *len += 2; /* From-URI < > */
if(dialog->loc_uri.s[dialog->loc_uri.len - 1]!='>') *len += 2; /*
From-URI < > */
At 2014-09-20 00:03:32, "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" miconda@gmail.com wrote:
Hello, can you send the changes as patch (diff) file? If you got kamailio from git, then you can do: git diff > /path/to/file.patch It is easier to review the changes and be sure we are not overwriting a new version of the file. Cheers, Daniel On 19/09/14 12:57, dongwf wrote:Hi Daniel: I added my fixing in attached t_msgbuilder.c, please take a review, mainly change in build_uac_req, print_to and print_from, thanks! At 2014-09-17 04:25:17, "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" <miconda@gmail.com> wrote: Hello, your remarks seems legit -- if you send a patch, I will review and commit it. Otherwise, open an issue on bugh tracker and will be fixed soon. I tested the patch with my scenario, it works fine. Cheers, Daniel On 17/09/14 10:06, dongwf wrote:Hi kamailio dev: I am writing a module to implement some features, my version is 4.1.2, I am not sure if it is a known issue, I found: 1. When I get a INVITE request with from/to like from:"display"<aaa@sip.com>, then I call tm's new_dlg_uas with the sip req, now the dlg's rem_uri set as value: "display"<aaa@sip.com>; 2. After that, when I need use the dlg to send BYE with tm's req_within with the above saved dlg, the print_to function will check the rem_uri's first value if "<" or not, now my uri has display name, so the outgoing BYE's to header becomes to:<"display"<aaa@sip.com>>, is it wrong? Should we check the last char in the rem_uri as ">"? The detail code is : static inline char* print_to(char* w, dlg_t* dialog, struct cell* t) { t->to.s = w; t->to.len = TO_LEN + dialog->rem_uri.len + CRLF_LEN + ((dialog->rem_uri.s[0]!='<')?2:0); memapp(w, TO, TO_LEN); if(dialog->rem_uri.s[0]!='<') memapp(w, "<", 1); memapp(w, dialog->rem_uri.s, dialog->rem_uri.len); if(dialog->rem_uri.s[0]!='<') memapp(w, ">", 1); .... _______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users-- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda -http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Next Kamailio Advanced Trainings 2014 -http://www.asipto.com Sep 22-25, Berlin, Germany-- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda -http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Next Kamailio Advanced Trainings 2014 -http://www.asipto.com Sep 22-25, Berlin, Germany
Oh, sorry, it's my first time to report patch for the project, will follow the guide in future :-)
At 2014-09-23 14:39:37, "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" miconda@gmail.com wrote: Hello,
I applied the patch copying manually the changes -- you can try the master branch to see if all works as expected. Son it will get backported to stable branches.
For future reference, you should use:
diff -u oldfile newfile >/tmp/file.patch
Then send the file.patch as attachment. Then one can save it locally from email and use:
patch -pX<file.patch
to apply the changes.
Thanks for troubleshooting and patching the issue.
Cheers, Daniel
On 22/09/14 12:27, dongwf wrote:
Hi: Sorry for the unconvinient, I didn't use git, I use diff tool generated diff for t_msgbuilder.c as below, is it ok for you?
1400c1400 < + ((dialog->rem_uri.s[0]!='<')?2:0); ---
+ ((dialog->rem_uri.s[dialog->rem_uri.len - 1]!='>')?2:0);
1403c1403 < if(dialog->rem_uri.s[0]!='<') memapp(w, "<", 1); ---
if(dialog->rem_uri.s[dialog->rem_uri.len - 1]!='>') memapp(w, "<", 1);
1405c1405 < if(dialog->rem_uri.s[0]!='<') memapp(w, ">", 1); ---
if(dialog->rem_uri.s[dialog->rem_uri.len - 1]!='>') memapp(w, ">", 1);
1425c1425 < + ((dialog->loc_uri.s[0]!='<')?2:0); ---
+ ((dialog->loc_uri.s[dialog->loc_uri.len - 1]!='>')?2:0);
1428c1428 < if(dialog->loc_uri.s[0]!='<') memapp(w, "<", 1); ---
if(dialog->loc_uri.s[dialog->loc_uri.len - 1]!='>') memapp(w, "<", 1);
1430c1430 < if(dialog->loc_uri.s[0]!='<') memapp(w, ">", 1); ---
if(dialog->loc_uri.s[dialog->loc_uri.len -1]!='>') memapp(w, ">", 1);
1551c1551 < if(dialog->rem_uri.s[0]!='<') *len += 2; /* To-URI < > */ ---
if(dialog->rem_uri.s[dialog->rem_uri.len - 1]!='>') *len += 2; /* To-URI < > */
1554c1554 < if(dialog->loc_uri.s[0]!='<') *len += 2; /* From-URI < > */ ---
if(dialog->loc_uri.s[dialog->loc_uri.len - 1]!='>') *len += 2; /* From-URI < > */
At 2014-09-20 00:03:32, "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" miconda@gmail.com wrote: Hello,
can you send the changes as patch (diff) file?
If you got kamailio from git, then you can do:
git diff > /path/to/file.patch
It is easier to review the changes and be sure we are not overwriting a new version of the file.
Cheers, Daniel
On 19/09/14 12:57, dongwf wrote:
Hi Daniel: I added my fixing in attached t_msgbuilder.c, please take a review, mainly change in build_uac_req, print_to and print_from, thanks!
At 2014-09-17 04:25:17, "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" miconda@gmail.com wrote: Hello,
your remarks seems legit -- if you send a patch, I will review and commit it. Otherwise, open an issue on bugh tracker and will be fixed soon. I tested the patch with my scenario, it works fine.
Cheers, Daniel
On 17/09/14 10:06, dongwf wrote:
Hi kamailio dev: I am writing a module to implement some features, my version is 4.1.2, I am not sure if it is a known issue, I found: 1. When I get a INVITE request with from/to like from:"display"aaa@sip.com, then I call tm's new_dlg_uas with the sip req, now the dlg's rem_uri set as value: "display"aaa@sip.com; 2. After that, when I need use the dlg to send BYE with tm's req_within with the above saved dlg, the print_to function will check the rem_uri's first value if "<" or not, now my uri has display name, so the outgoing BYE's to header becomes to:<"display"aaa@sip.com>, is it wrong? Should we check the last char in the rem_uri as ">"?
The detail code is : static inline char* print_to(char* w, dlg_t* dialog, struct cell* t) { t->to.s = w; t->to.len = TO_LEN + dialog->rem_uri.len + CRLF_LEN + ((dialog->rem_uri.s[0]!='<')?2:0);
memapp(w, TO, TO_LEN); if(dialog->rem_uri.s[0]!='<') memapp(w, "<", 1); memapp(w, dialog->rem_uri.s, dialog->rem_uri.len); if(dialog->rem_uri.s[0]!='<') memapp(w, ">", 1); ....
_______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.orghttp://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
-
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -
dongwf