Hi Marian,

Thank you taking the time to answer my question. The serial forking example is exactly what I need. Is there a sample "set_fork_list()" function that you can point me to?

Regards, Dmitry

----- Original Message ----- From: "Marian Dumitru" marian.dumitru@voice-sistem.ro To: "Dmitry Isakbayev" isakdim@gmail.com Cc: serusers@lists.iptel.org Sent: Friday, June 10, 2005 6:16 AM Subject: Re: [Serusers] How to execute failure_route block by the same child process.

Hi Dimitry,

you don't need to implement anything else for serial forking - it's already there. Take a look to this example which shows a way to do it:

http://www.voice-system.ro/docs/avpops/ar01s08.html#ex_serial_forking

about your question - no, is not possible. If you want to store some information from main route and used in failure_route use AVPs. (see avpops module) http://www.voice-system.ro/docs/avpops/

regards, Marian

Dmitry Isakbayev wrote:

...

Hello, I am trying to implement sequential forking using to_on_failure and failure_route blocks. Is there a way to configure SER or tm module to execute the 'failure-route' blocks using the same process as was used for executing the main route script? If it was possible, I would not need to share state information between different SER processes Thank you in advance, Dmitry

-- Voice System http://www.voice-system.ro

Bogdan-Andrei Iancu writes:

you can either use avpops to populate the fork_list (use avp_write or avp_load to read from db), either there is a function (not sure about the name) in lcr module (also to read from db).

lcr module's sequential forking is based on contacts having different q values. ser.cfg first needs to call load_contacts() that loads all contacts to avps and after that ser.cfg needs to call next_contacts() as many times as there are contacts left or the requests succeeds.

-- juha