In ser you can have multiple domains (I think there is a setup in the archive), and use aliases to tell ser which all domains you really work with.

Iqbal

Ritesh Jalan wrote:

Raid

Its better to use some RTP proxy, or the best will be to use Ser + Asterisk

Thanks & Regards Ritesh Jalan Senior Engineer - Test & Audit Net4India Ltd. 703 Bikaji Cama Bhawan 11 Bikaji Cama Place New Delhi - 110029 Ph: +91-11-26160129 ext. 131 Cell : +91-9818616329 Web site: http://www.net4india.com ============================================================================ ============================================== This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the addressee, you must not use, copy, disclose or take any action based on this message or any information herein. If you have received this message in error, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this message. Thank you for your cooperation. ============================================================================ ============================================== ----- Original Message ----- From: raid@gmx.net To: serusers@lists.iptel.org Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 5:04 PM Subject: [Serusers] domain/realm routing

...

hi all

example:

uac1 with number 12345 and realm my1.mydomain.com uac2 with number 54321 and realm my2.mydomain.com and so on

i use enum to write the called brunch to the realm this funktion is ok (if someone call 12345/123, enum rewrite the uri to 123@my1.mydomain.com) but ser says no user 123@my1.mydomain.com

if i change in enum zonefile my1.mydomain.com to the ip address of the uac ser send the call to the uac1, but there is no connect because the uac1 is behind nat the next problem is if the user has a dynamic ip

is there a way to bind an uac/user to an realm (all calls 12345/branches route to uac1@my1.mydomain.com)

i hope you understand my problem

sorry for my bad english :(

regards raid

-- Weitersagen: GMX DSL-Flatrates mit Tempo-Garantie! Ab 4,99 Euro/Monat: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/dsl

---

Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers

---

Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers

.

hi

thanks for your answer

i use mediaproxy and nat works fine, but if i route the call with enum to uac´s ip, mediaproxy dont proxy the call

if i provide 100 aliases for all users there is many work

i wouldn´t try that for more than 500 users, any user have the same extensions and there overlap with any aliases

the best solution would be to bind a user to his own realm and all incomig calls with this realm forward to this user

isn´t there any other possibilty?

thanks

--- Ursprüngliche Nachricht --- Von: Iqbal iqbal@gigo.co.uk An: Ritesh Jalan ritesh.j@net4india.net Kopie: raid@gmx.net, serusers@lists.iptel.org Betreff: Re: [Serusers] domain/realm routing Datum: Tue, 07 Jun 2005 13:14:30 +0100

Oh and for NAT, you can use nathelper and RTP proxy, or mediaproxy, or as suggested asterisk, that latter is overkill I think unless you wish to use other features of asterisk.

You can scale nicely with mediaproxy, also it depends upon what type of NAT you are using/dealing with, again in the archives there is a huge discussion on NAT.

iqbal

Ritesh Jalan wrote:

...

Raid

Its better to use some RTP proxy, or the best will be to use Ser +

Asterisk

...

Thanks & Regards Ritesh Jalan Senior Engineer - Test & Audit Net4India Ltd. 703 Bikaji Cama Bhawan 11 Bikaji Cama Place New Delhi - 110029 Ph: +91-11-26160129 ext. 131 Cell : +91-9818616329 Web site: http://www.net4india.com

============================================================================

...

============================================== This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If

you

...

are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the addressee,

you

...

must not use, copy, disclose or take any action based on this message or

any

...

information herein. If you have received this message in error, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this message.

Thank

...

you for your cooperation.

============================================================================

...

============================================== ----- Original Message ----- From: raid@gmx.net To: serusers@lists.iptel.org Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 5:04 PM Subject: [Serusers] domain/realm routing

...

hi all

example:

uac1 with number 12345 and realm my1.mydomain.com uac2 with number 54321 and realm my2.mydomain.com and so on

i use enum to write the called brunch to the realm this funktion is ok (if someone call 12345/123, enum rewrite the uri to 123@my1.mydomain.com) but ser says no user 123@my1.mydomain.com

if i change in enum zonefile my1.mydomain.com to the ip address of the

uac

...

...

ser send the call to the uac1, but there is no connect because the uac1

is

...

...

behind nat the next problem is if the user has a dynamic ip

is there a way to bind an uac/user to an realm (all calls 12345/branches route to uac1@my1.mydomain.com)

i hope you understand my problem

sorry for my bad english :(

regards raid

-- Weitersagen: GMX DSL-Flatrates mit Tempo-Garantie! Ab 4,99 Euro/Monat: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/dsl

---

Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers

---

Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers

.