Hi All.
Does anyone know why my grandstream BT100 firmware 1.0.5.16 shows the caller ID rather than "anonymous" even though I have Remote-Part-ID enabled with privacy=full?
Below is the INVITE message sent to the BT100 from a UTstarcom ATA.
Regards, Paul
U 2005/01/24 16:43:55.073424 68.84.xxx.xxx:5060 -> 68.84.xxx.xxx:13721 INVITE sip:3215551212@68.84.xxx.xxx:13721;user=phone SIP/2.0. Record-Route: sip:68.84.xxx.xxx;ftag=2590080990;lr=on. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 68.84.xxx.xxx;branch=z9hG4bK5082.72060543.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.0.86:5060;rport=1041;received=68.84.xxx.xxx;branch=z9hG4bK1403464825. From: UTStarcom sip:4075551212@mycompany.com;tag=2590080990. To: sip:3215551212@mycompany.com. Call-ID: 1980470039@192.168.0.86. CSeq: 1301 INVITE. Contact: sip:4075551212@68.84.xxx.xxx:1041. max-forwards: 16. subject: sipcall. Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, BYE, REFER, NOTIFY. Content-Type: application/sdp. Content-Length: 178. Remote-Party-ID: "Anonymous" sip:unknown@68.84.xxx.xxx;user=phone;party=calling;screen=yes;id-type=subscriber;privacy=full. . v=0. o=- 1363 3077 IN IP4 192.168.0.86. s=-. c=IN IP4 68.84.xxx.xxx. t=0 0. m=audio 36526 RTP/AVP 18 0 8 2 4 101. a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000. a=fmtp:101 0-15. a=ptime:20.
__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - Helps protect you from nasty viruses. http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
Well, it seems to assume model in which content of caller id is intended for use by PSTN gateways that see just the caller id and don't care about content of From then. So all it does is it enables privacy in the caller id. I think it would make sense to use "anonymous" From in that case too.
-jiri
At 10:49 PM 1/24/2005, Java Rockx wrote:
Hi All.
Does anyone know why my grandstream BT100 firmware 1.0.5.16 shows the caller ID rather than "anonymous" even though I have Remote-Part-ID enabled with privacy=full?
Below is the INVITE message sent to the BT100 from a UTstarcom ATA.
Regards, Paul
U 2005/01/24 16:43:55.073424 68.84.xxx.xxx:5060 -> 68.84.xxx.xxx:13721 INVITE sip:3215551212@68.84.xxx.xxx:13721;user=phone SIP/2.0. Record-Route: sip:68.84.xxx.xxx;ftag=2590080990;lr=on. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 68.84.xxx.xxx;branch=z9hG4bK5082.72060543.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.0.86:5060;rport=1041;received=68.84.xxx.xxx;branch=z9hG4bK1403464825. From: UTStarcom sip:4075551212@mycompany.com;tag=2590080990. To: sip:3215551212@mycompany.com. Call-ID: 1980470039@192.168.0.86. CSeq: 1301 INVITE. Contact: sip:4075551212@68.84.xxx.xxx:1041. max-forwards: 16. subject: sipcall. Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, BYE, REFER, NOTIFY. Content-Type: application/sdp. Content-Length: 178. Remote-Party-ID: "Anonymous" sip:unknown@68.84.xxx.xxx;user=phone;party=calling;screen=yes;id-type=subscriber;privacy=full. . v=0. o=- 1363 3077 IN IP4 192.168.0.86. s=-. c=IN IP4 68.84.xxx.xxx. t=0 0. m=audio 36526 RTP/AVP 18 0 8 2 4 101. a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000. a=fmtp:101 0-15. a=ptime:20.
Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - Helps protect you from nasty viruses. http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
-- Jiri Kuthan http://iptel.org/~jiri/
Jiri,
I started down that road of thinking until I realized that having the SIP proxy alter the FROM header was a bad thing.
I wish there were some way, from the ser proxy, to guarantee blocking caller ID for both SIP->PSTN and SIP->SIP calls.
Our situation is that we need to ship IADs/ATAs to customers preconfigured and locked down to keep customers from messing up their settings and to keep them from knowing their SER username/password. So we can't allow users to permanently enable caller id blocking on their ATA.
I guess *67 is my only choice for now, but this has to be dialed every time a subscriber calls someone :-(
Regards, Paul
--- Jiri Kuthan jiri@iptel.org wrote:
Well, it seems to assume model in which content of caller id is intended for use by PSTN gateways that see just the caller id and don't care about content of From then. So all it does is it enables privacy in the caller id. I think it would make sense to use "anonymous" From in that case too.
-jiri
At 10:49 PM 1/24/2005, Java Rockx wrote:
Hi All.
Does anyone know why my grandstream BT100 firmware 1.0.5.16 shows the caller ID rather than "anonymous" even though I have Remote-Part-ID enabled with privacy=full?
Below is the INVITE message sent to the BT100 from a UTstarcom ATA.
Regards, Paul
U 2005/01/24 16:43:55.073424 68.84.xxx.xxx:5060 -> 68.84.xxx.xxx:13721 INVITE sip:3215551212@68.84.xxx.xxx:13721;user=phone SIP/2.0. Record-Route: sip:68.84.xxx.xxx;ftag=2590080990;lr=on. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 68.84.xxx.xxx;branch=z9hG4bK5082.72060543.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.0.86:5060;rport=1041;received=68.84.xxx.xxx;branch=z9hG4bK1403464825. From: UTStarcom sip:4075551212@mycompany.com;tag=2590080990. To: sip:3215551212@mycompany.com. Call-ID: 1980470039@192.168.0.86. CSeq: 1301 INVITE. Contact: sip:4075551212@68.84.xxx.xxx:1041. max-forwards: 16. subject: sipcall. Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, BYE, REFER, NOTIFY. Content-Type: application/sdp. Content-Length: 178. Remote-Party-ID: "Anonymous"
sip:unknown@68.84.xxx.xxx;user=phone;party=calling;screen=yes;id-type=subscriber;privacy=full.
. v=0. o=- 1363 3077 IN IP4 192.168.0.86. s=-. c=IN IP4 68.84.xxx.xxx. t=0 0. m=audio 36526 RTP/AVP 18 0 8 2 4 101. a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000. a=fmtp:101 0-15. a=ptime:20.
Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - Helps protect you from nasty viruses. http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
-- Jiri Kuthan http://iptel.org/~jiri/
__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Meet the all-new My Yahoo! - Try it today! http://my.yahoo.com
*67/68 should be for all following calls. *81/82 are per call. After *67, all calls should have anonymous user name if it is supported.
Richard
-----Original Message----- From: serusers-bounces@iptel.org [mailto:serusers-bounces@lists.iptel.org] On Behalf Of Java Rockx Sent: Monday, January 24, 2005 3:03 PM To: ser users Subject: Re: [Serusers] Grandstream BT100 Shows Caller ID Even With RPIDprivacy=full
Jiri,
I started down that road of thinking until I realized that having the SIP proxy alter the FROM header was a bad thing.
I wish there were some way, from the ser proxy, to guarantee blocking caller ID for both SIP->PSTN and SIP->SIP calls.
Our situation is that we need to ship IADs/ATAs to customers preconfigured and locked down to keep customers from messing up their settings and to keep them from knowing their SER username/password. So we can't allow users to permanently enable caller id blocking on their ATA.
I guess *67 is my only choice for now, but this has to be dialed every time a subscriber calls someone :-(
Regards, Paul
--- Jiri Kuthan jiri@iptel.org wrote:
Well, it seems to assume model in which content of caller id is intended for use by PSTN gateways that see just the caller id and don't care about content of From then. So all it does is it enables privacy in the caller id. I think it would make sense to use "anonymous" From in that case too.
-jiri
At 10:49 PM 1/24/2005, Java Rockx wrote:
Hi All.
Does anyone know why my grandstream BT100 firmware 1.0.5.16 shows the
caller ID rather than
"anonymous" even though I have Remote-Part-ID enabled with
privacy=full?
Below is the INVITE message sent to the BT100 from a UTstarcom ATA.
Regards, Paul
U 2005/01/24 16:43:55.073424 68.84.xxx.xxx:5060 -> 68.84.xxx.xxx:13721 INVITE sip:3215551212@68.84.xxx.xxx:13721;user=phone SIP/2.0. Record-Route: sip:68.84.xxx.xxx;ftag=2590080990;lr=on. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 68.84.xxx.xxx;branch=z9hG4bK5082.72060543.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
192.168.0.86:5060;rport=1041;received=68.84.xxx.xxx;branch=z9hG4bK14034648 25.
From: UTStarcom sip:4075551212@mycompany.com;tag=2590080990. To: sip:3215551212@mycompany.com. Call-ID: 1980470039@192.168.0.86. CSeq: 1301 INVITE. Contact: sip:4075551212@68.84.xxx.xxx:1041. max-forwards: 16. subject: sipcall. Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, BYE, REFER, NOTIFY. Content-Type: application/sdp. Content-Length: 178. Remote-Party-ID: "Anonymous"
sip:unknown@68.84.xxx.xxx;user=phone;party=calling;screen=yes;id-
type=subscriber;privacy=full.
. v=0. o=- 1363 3077 IN IP4 192.168.0.86. s=-. c=IN IP4 68.84.xxx.xxx. t=0 0. m=audio 36526 RTP/AVP 18 0 8 2 4 101. a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000. a=fmtp:101 0-15. a=ptime:20.
Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - Helps protect you from nasty viruses. http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
-- Jiri Kuthan http://iptel.org/~jiri/
Do you Yahoo!? Meet the all-new My Yahoo! - Try it today! http://my.yahoo.com
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Yep. That's right, but I was looking for a way to do _permanent_ caller id blocking so that *67 wasn't required.
Paul
--- Richard richard@o-matrix.org wrote:
*67/68 should be for all following calls. *81/82 are per call. After *67, all calls should have anonymous user name if it is supported.
Richard
-----Original Message----- From: serusers-bounces@iptel.org [mailto:serusers-bounces@lists.iptel.org] On Behalf Of Java Rockx Sent: Monday, January 24, 2005 3:03 PM To: ser users Subject: Re: [Serusers] Grandstream BT100 Shows Caller ID Even With RPIDprivacy=full
Jiri,
I started down that road of thinking until I realized that having the SIP proxy alter the FROM header was a bad thing.
I wish there were some way, from the ser proxy, to guarantee blocking caller ID for both SIP->PSTN and SIP->SIP calls.
Our situation is that we need to ship IADs/ATAs to customers preconfigured and locked down to keep customers from messing up their settings and to keep them from knowing their SER username/password. So we can't allow users to permanently enable caller id blocking on their ATA.
I guess *67 is my only choice for now, but this has to be dialed every time a subscriber calls someone :-(
Regards, Paul
--- Jiri Kuthan jiri@iptel.org wrote:
Well, it seems to assume model in which content of caller id is intended for use by PSTN gateways that see just the caller id and don't care about content of From then. So all it does is it enables privacy in the caller id. I think it would make sense to use "anonymous" From in that case too.
-jiri
At 10:49 PM 1/24/2005, Java Rockx wrote:
Hi All.
Does anyone know why my grandstream BT100 firmware 1.0.5.16 shows the
caller ID rather than
"anonymous" even though I have Remote-Part-ID enabled with
privacy=full?
Below is the INVITE message sent to the BT100 from a UTstarcom ATA.
Regards, Paul
U 2005/01/24 16:43:55.073424 68.84.xxx.xxx:5060 -> 68.84.xxx.xxx:13721 INVITE sip:3215551212@68.84.xxx.xxx:13721;user=phone SIP/2.0. Record-Route: sip:68.84.xxx.xxx;ftag=2590080990;lr=on. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 68.84.xxx.xxx;branch=z9hG4bK5082.72060543.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
192.168.0.86:5060;rport=1041;received=68.84.xxx.xxx;branch=z9hG4bK14034648 25.
From: UTStarcom sip:4075551212@mycompany.com;tag=2590080990. To: sip:3215551212@mycompany.com. Call-ID: 1980470039@192.168.0.86. CSeq: 1301 INVITE. Contact: sip:4075551212@68.84.xxx.xxx:1041. max-forwards: 16. subject: sipcall. Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, BYE, REFER, NOTIFY. Content-Type: application/sdp. Content-Length: 178. Remote-Party-ID: "Anonymous"
sip:unknown@68.84.xxx.xxx;user=phone;party=calling;screen=yes;id-
type=subscriber;privacy=full.
. v=0. o=- 1363 3077 IN IP4 192.168.0.86. s=-. c=IN IP4 68.84.xxx.xxx. t=0 0. m=audio 36526 RTP/AVP 18 0 8 2 4 101. a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000. a=fmtp:101 0-15. a=ptime:20.
Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - Helps protect you from nasty viruses. http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
-- Jiri Kuthan http://iptel.org/~jiri/
Do you Yahoo!? Meet the all-new My Yahoo! - Try it today! http://my.yahoo.com
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - Easier than ever with enhanced search. Learn more. http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250
-
Java Rockx -
Jiri Kuthan -
Richard