Re: [Kamailio-Users] In-dialog request correlation without loose routing? - sr-users

17 Oct 2008

Klaus Darilion wrote:

...
  Alex Balashov schrieb:
  BTW, I do think it would be a good idea for the
dialog module to 
 export these functions directly into the script symbols so they can be 
 called that way.  I do not like to do loose routing unnecessarily / 
 when I have no use for it.  
 How does your setup work without loose_route? The proxy sees in-dialog 
 requests only if you record_route. If you do record_route(), you have to 
 use loose_route for correct routing. You can't have one without the 
 other (except you do manual routing also for in-dialog requests) 
That's generally what I always do - manual routing for in-dialog requests.

I was not aware that loose_route() is required for correct routing of
in-dialog requests when they are record-routed back through the proxy.

I think one of the reasons why this may not be much of an issue for me
is because my proxy applications generally always have the proxy as the
URI domain - I won't relay for !uri == myself.  So, after the initial
INVITE is rewritten, the UAC/UAS cores on either side send subsequent
in-dialog requests to the same URI they sent the INVITE to.

I would, of course, be eager to hear any methodological insights you may
offer about what I'm doing incorrectly.

-- 
Alex Balashov
Evariste Systems
Web    : http://www.evaristesys.com/
Tel    : (+1) (678) 954-0670
Direct : (+1) (678) 954-0671
Mobile : (+1) (706) 338-8599