Hi!
Once again I want to discuss the problem of avpops in reply_routes (e.g. http://www.openser.org/pipermail/users/2005-October/001281.html)
I can bypass the syntax parser by putting the AVP-commands into a normal route block which is executed from the reply_route.
As far as I understand this may cause problems as the AVP-ops are done without locking. But what may happen in worst case? Bad AVPs or a crash?
thanks klaus
btw: is there any other way to handle data from a reply_route ?
Hi Klaus,
this problem was recently fixed. See: http://www.openser.org/pipermail/users/2007-February/009024.html
regards, bogdan
Klaus Darilion wrote:
Hi!
Once again I want to discuss the problem of avpops in reply_routes (e.g. http://www.openser.org/pipermail/users/2005-October/001281.html)
I can bypass the syntax parser by putting the AVP-commands into a normal route block which is executed from the reply_route.
As far as I understand this may cause problems as the AVP-ops are done without locking. But what may happen in worst case? Bad AVPs or a crash?
thanks klaus
btw: is there any other way to handle data from a reply_route ?
Users mailing list Users@openser.org http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users