Hello, I got myself an eyebeam this evening and tried it out using my current (working) configuration of ser-0.9.0. It seems that SER does not handle the SUBSCRIBE/PUBLISH from eyebeam very well. I've added information from sip-scenario (I've removed some information):
I've read that the eyebeam SDK includes a pa module for SER.......
I will try to debug more later.
SIP MESSAGE 7 80.203.x.x:55547() -> 195.18.x.x:5060() UDP Frame 7 12/Jan/05 20:55:18.5705 TimeFromPreviousSipFrame=0.0017 TimeFromStart=0.5251 SUBSCRIBE sip:67830xxx@xxx.xxx SIP/2.0 To: sip:67830xxx@xxx.xxx From: 67830xxxsip:67830xxx@xxx.xxx;tag=3544bd3b Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.0.0.6:8322;branch=z9hG4bK-d87543-588658107-1--d87543-;rport Call-ID: a83fe920817d483f CSeq: 1 SUBSCRIBE Contact: sip:6783xxx@10.0.0.6:8322 Expires: 3600 Max-Forwards: 70 Accept: application/watcherinfo+xml Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, NOTIFY, MESSAGE, SUBSCRIBE User-Agent: eyeBeam release 3003x stamp 16296 (sn:4b7196e19649bda632a5) Event: presence.winfo Content-Length: 0
SIP MESSAGE 8 195.18.xxx.xxx:5060() -> 80.203.xxx.xxx:55547() UDP Frame 8 12/Jan/05 20:55:18.5898 TimeFromPreviousSipFrame=0.0192 TimeFromStart=0.5444 SIP/2.0 400 Bad Request To: sip:67830xxx@xxx.xxx;tag=f6cf184986e86bc8dffc7813fc0be2e4-11a5 From: 67830xxxsip:67830xxx@xxx.xxx;tag=3544bd3b Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.0.0.6:8322;branch=z9hG4bK-d87543-588658107-1--d87543-;rport=55547;received=80.203.xxx.xxx Call-ID: a83fe920817d483f CSeq: 1 SUBSCRIBE P-NATed-Caller: Yes Error while parsing headersServer: Sip EXpress router (0.9.0 (i386/linux)) Content-Length: 0 Warning: 392 195.18.xxx.xxx:5060 "Noisy feedback tells: pid=13719 req_src_ip=80.203.xxx.xxx req_src_port=55547 in_uri=sip:67830xxx@xxx.xxx out_uri=sip:67830xxx@xxx.xxx via_cnt==1"
As for PUBLISH:
SIP MESSAGE 9 80.203.xxx.xxx:55547() -> 195.18.xxx.xxx:5060() UDP Frame 9 12/Jan/05 20:55:19.5746 TimeFromPreviousSipFrame=0.9848 TimeFromStart=1.5291 PUBLISH sip:67830xxx@xxx.xxx SIP/2.0 To: sip:67830xxx@xxx.xxx From: 67830xxxsip:67830xxx@xxx.xxx;tag=5c3ff501 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.0.0.6:8322;branch=z9hG4bK-d87543-908356443-1--d87543-;rport Call-ID: bb42e678f246d35e CSeq: 1 PUBLISH Contact: sip:67830xxx@10.0.0.6:8322 Expires: 3600 Max-Forwards: 70 Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, NOTIFY, MESSAGE, SUBSCRIBE Content-Type: application/pidf+xml User-Agent: eyeBeam release 3003x stamp 16296 (sn:4b7196e19649bda632a5) Event: presence Content-Length: 602
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <presence xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf" xmlns:pp="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:person" xmlns:et="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:rpid:rpid-tuple" xmlns:ep="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:rpid:rpid-person" xmlns:es="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:rpid:status:rpid-status" xmlns:ci="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:cipid" entity="sip:67830xxx@xxx.xxx"> pp:person <status> </status> </pp:person> <tuple id="t14"> <contact priority="1">sip:67830xxx@xxx.xxx</contact> <status> <basic>open</basic> </status> </tuple> </presence>
SIP MESSAGE 10 195.18.xxx.xxx:5060() -> 80.203.xxx.xxx:55547() UDP Frame 10 12/Jan/05 20:55:19.5876 TimeFromPreviousSipFrame=0.0131 TimeFromStart=1.5422 SIP/2.0 400 Bad Request To: sip:67830065@smartnet.no;tag=f6cf184986e86bc8dffc7813fc0be2e4-d986 From: 67830xxxsip:67830xxx@xxx.xxx;tag=5c3ff501 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.0.0.6:8322;branch=z9hG4bK-d87543-908356443-1--d87543-;rport=55547;received=80.203.xxx.xxx Call-ID: bb42e678f246d35e CSeq: 1 PUBLISH P-NATed-Caller: Yes Event header field missingServer: Sip EXpress router (0.9.0 (i386/linux)) Content-Length: 0 Warning: 392 195.18.xxx.xxx:5060 "Noisy feedback tells: pid=13707 req_src_ip=80.203.xxx.xxx req_src_port=55547 in_uri=sip:67830xxx@xxx.xxx out_uri=sip:67830xxx@xxx.xxx via_cnt==1"
-----Original Message----- From: Jamey Hicks [mailto:jamey.hicks@hp.com] Sent: Tue 1/11/2005 11:41 PM To: Helge Waastad Cc: serusers@lists.iptel.org Subject: Re: [Serusers] ser-0.9.0 and PA clients
Helge Waastad wrote:
Eyebeam from xten.com seems to be the farthest along in terms of implementing SIMPLE presence support, according to their website. I know Xten was testing against the SER PA this fall. That being said, testing Eyebeam against SER 0.9 is on my todo list for this week. I just need to set up a SER 0.9 PA on the same side of the HP firewall as my Windows box.
Jamey
-
Helge Waastad