So I should be do something like:

failuer_route[1] { if (status =~"606") { exit; } }

meaning that there is an implicit ACK by openser and by the above config snippet I just do not process the 606, meaning I don't forward it to the destination.

Is my understanding correct?

Ramin

On 10/22/06, Daniel-Constantin Mierla daniel@voice-system.ro wrote:

Hello,

ACK is sent automatically by OpenSER if you do stateful processing. You can intercept negative replies for a request and reprocess the request in failure_route.

Cheers, Daniel

On 10/20/06 20:54, Ramin Dousti wrote:

...

Hello,

How can I generate an ACK locally on openser proxy as a responsetof a failure? And subsequently drop the failed message. In other word I do not want to pass the failed message back to my UA, I just want to process it on openser...

Thanks in advance,

My understanding was incorrect. There are implicit actions that cannot be controled by the script.

Does anyone know a trick to force these implicit actions to change behaviour?

Thanks, Ramin

On 10/22/06, Ramin Dousti dousti@gmail.com wrote:

So I should be do something like:

failuer_route[1] { if (status =~"606") { exit; } }

meaning that there is an implicit ACK by openser and by the above config snippet I just do not process the 606, meaning I don't forward it to the destination.

Is my understanding correct?

Ramin

On 10/22/06, Daniel-Constantin Mierla daniel@voice-system.ro wrote:

...

Hello,

ACK is sent automatically by OpenSER if you do stateful processing. You can intercept negative replies for a request and reprocess the request in failure_route.

Cheers, Daniel

On 10/20/06 20:54, Ramin Dousti wrote:

...

Hello,

How can I generate an ACK locally on openser proxy as a responsetof a failure? And subsequently drop the failed message. In other word I do not want to pass the failed message back to my UA, I just want to process it on openser...

Thanks in advance,

-- Ramin