17 Oct
2007
17 Oct
'07
11:22 a.m.
Hi, I use "branch_route[1]" for common branches and want to
use "branch_route[3]" just for initial INVITE's.
But I'd like "branch_route[1]" is runned after "branch_route[3]"
but think is
not possible, so I must copy&paste the "branch_route[1]" code at the end
of "branch_route[3]".
Is it?
Thanks.
--
Iñaki Baz Castillo
ibc(a)in.ilimit.es
17 Oct
17 Oct
11:28 a.m.
New subject: [OpenSER-Users] Is possible to use two "branch_route[ ]" for same branch?
Hi,
You may also create a route[] for the common code and call that route
from your branch routes.
Andreas
Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
Hi, I use "branch_route[1]" for common
branches and want to
use "branch_route[3]" just for initial INVITE's.
But I'd like "branch_route[1]" is runned after "branch_route[3]"
but think is
not possible, so I must copy&paste the "branch_route[1]" code at the end
of "branch_route[3]".
Is it?
Thanks.
12:14 p.m.
New subject: [OpenSER-Users] Is possible to use two "branch_route[ ]" for same branch?
El Wednesday 17 October 2007 13:28:55 Andreas Granig escribió:
Hi,
You may also create a route[] for the common code and call that route
from your branch routes.
I thougt that but have a doubt: if I call a "route(1)" from
"branch_route[3]",
what is processed in "route[1]"? all the branch together of each one?
So, if I do:
route {
...
t_on_branch("1");
t_relay;
}
branch_route[1] {
if (is_method("INVITE") )
route(3);
...
...
}
route[3] {
...
operate_in_separate_branch here ¿?¿?¿?
o in all branches together ?¿?¿?¿
}
What is processed in route[3] ?
Thanks.
--
Iñaki Baz Castillo
ibc(a)in.ilimit.es
12:24 p.m.
New subject: [OpenSER-Users] Is possible to use two "branch_route[ ]" for same branch?
You want to avoid to copy&paste redundant code in your branch-route,
right? So the following snipped should do the same as if you were able
to execute branch_route[1] after branch_route[3]:
route
{
if(/* initial invite */)
t_on_branch("3");
else
t_on_branch("1");
// ...
}
// your branch-route helper
route[20]
{
// some code executed by both branch routes
}
// broute for common requests
branch_route[1]
{
route(20);
}
// broute for initial invites
branch_route[3]
{
// some branch-specific stuff here, then:
route(20);
}
Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
El Wednesday 17 October 2007 13:28:55 Andreas Granig
escribió:
Hi,
You may also create a route[] for the common code and call that route
from your branch routes.
I thougt that but have a doubt: if I call a "route(1)" from
"branch_route[3]",
what is processed in "route[1]"? all the branch together of each one?
So, if I do:
route {
...
t_on_branch("1");
t_relay;
}
branch_route[1] {
if (is_method("INVITE") )
route(3);
...
...
}
route[3] {
...
operate_in_separate_branch here ¿?¿?¿?
o in all branches together ?¿?¿?¿
}
What is processed in route[3] ?
Thanks.
12:37 p.m.
New subject: [OpenSER-Users] Is possible to use two "branch_route[ ]" for same branch?
El Wednesday 17 October 2007 14:24:46 Andreas Granig escribió:
You want to avoid to copy&paste redundant code in
your branch-route,
right? So the following snipped should do the same as if you were able
to execute branch_route[1] after branch_route[3]:
route
{
if(/* initial invite */)
t_on_branch("3");
else
t_on_branch("1");
// ...
}
// your branch-route helper
route[20]
{
// some code executed by both branch routes
}
// broute for common requests
branch_route[1]
{
route(20);
}
// broute for initial invites
branch_route[3]
{
// some branch-specific stuff here, then:
route(20);
}
Ok, thanks. Just lem me insist on a question to be sure:
If a "route[X]" is called from a "branch_route[Y]" then in that
"route[X]" is
just processed each separate branch and not all together as in main route, is
it?
Thanks.
--
Iñaki Baz Castillo
ibc(a)in.ilimit.es
12:41 p.m.
New subject: [OpenSER-Users] Is possible to use two "branch_route[ ]" for same branch?
If a "route[X]" is called from a
"branch_route[Y]" then in that "route[X]" is
just processed each separate branch and not all together as in main route, is
it?
Yes, changes made in route[X] are only visible to the current branch
being processed. Right, Daniel?
Andreas
12:48 p.m.
New subject: [OpenSER-Users] Is possible to use two "branch_route[ ]" for same branch?
Hello,
On 10/17/07 15:41, Andreas Granig wrote:
yes. For example, this is a way to do rtp relaying
only for natted
branches, or to drop a branch if does not meet some conditions.
Cheers,
Daniel
If a
"route[X]" is called from a "branch_route[Y]" then in that
"route[X]" is just processed each separate branch and not all
together as in main route, is it?
Yes, changes made in route[X] are only visible to the current branch
being processed. Right, Daniel?
Andreas
1:09 p.m.
New subject: [OpenSER-Users] Is possible to use two "branch_route[ ]" for same branch?
El Wednesday 17 October 2007 14:48:36 Daniel-Constantin Mierla escribió:
Hello,
On 10/17/07 15:41, Andreas Granig wrote:
yes. For example, this is a way to do rtp relaying only for natted
branches, or to drop a branch if does not meet some conditions.
Ok, is nice to know it.
I'll add it to the wiki since is nothing about it.
Thanks a lot.
--
Iñaki Baz Castillo
ibc(a)in.ilimit.es
If a
"route[X]" is called from a "branch_route[Y]" then in that
"route[X]" is just processed each separate branch and not all
together as in main route, is it?
Yes, changes made in route[X] are only visible to the current branch
being processed. Right, Daniel?
6117
days inactive
6117
days old
7 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Andreas Granig -
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -
Iñaki Baz Castillo