10 Mar
2009
10 Mar
'09
8:09 a.m.
the new send_reply() function is not documented in sl/README.
another related thing: would it be logical to also have corresponding
reply_error() function especially when t_relay seems to create
transaction even in case of some internal errors.
-- juha
11 Mar
11 Mar
9:04 a.m.
Hello,
On 03/10/2009 08:09 AM, Juha Heinanen wrote:
the new send_reply() function is not documented in
sl/README.
added in trunk. I will backport to 1.5.x.
another related thing: would it be logical to also
have corresponding
reply_error() function especially when t_relay seems to create
transaction even in case of some internal errors.
Now there is no t_reply_error() that can be used, but can be added in
the future.
Cheers,
Daniel
-- juha
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (OpenSER) - Users mailing list
Users(a)lists.kamailio.org
http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
http://lists.openser-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://www.asipto.com
9:33 a.m.
Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:
Now there is no t_reply_error() that can be used, but
can be added in
the future.
daniel,
should there be, because how else i can report correctly t_relay()
error:
if (!t_relay()) {
if (!t_check_trans()) {
sl_reply_error();
} else {
******* what to put here?
};
};
-- juha
5736
days inactive
5737
days old
2 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -
jh＠tutpro.com