24 Apr
2003
24 Apr
'03
4:32 a.m.
Hi ,
In Ser's Makefile.defs , originally , it define PKG_MALLOC , SHM_MEM ,
SHM_MMAP ,for shared memory,
and I would like to marked it , cause i want to try let it not use shared
memory
(and modified ser.cfg let it just produce one main parent process )
I tried marked those three definitions , but it has error when compile ,
it seems some modules still need functions which only exist when those three
definitions is defined,
do those three definitions can't marked?
or in ser , it can't work without using shared memory , can't mark those
definition?
Thanks ,
Jimmy
24 Apr
24 Apr
4:51 a.m.
Hi,
On Thursday 24 April 2003 03:32, jimmy_huang wrote:
Hi ,
In Ser's Makefile.defs , originally , it define PKG_MALLOC , SHM_MEM ,
SHM_MMAP ,for shared memory,
and I would like to marked it , cause i want to try let it not use shared
memory
Question for my personal intereset: why do you want to do it?
(and modified ser.cfg let it just produce one main
parent process )
Modifing ser.cfg will never result in just one process, because
their is
allways a timer process.
I tried marked those three definitions , but it has
error when compile ,
it seems some modules still need functions which only exist when those
three definitions is defined,
do those three definitions can't marked?
or in ser , it can't work without using shared memory , can't mark those
definition?
It hardly depends on the modules you use. But usrloc for example will
not work
without shared memory. And i think also tm will not work without shared
memory.
So if do not use any module which needs shared mem you will probably end up
with a stateless SIP proxy with not many features.
Conclusion: it could theoreticly be possible to use Ser without shared mem
with probably a lot code changes. Allthough i do not understand the intention
for this goal and the result would be unsatisfactoy in terms of performance,
features etc.
Greetings
Nils
10:41 a.m.
I don't think that it is easy to use SER w/o shmem -- many important
parts of SER depend on it and there are good reasons for that. These
include TCP and timer support in core, and many frequently used
modules including tm and usrloc.
-Jiri
At 03:32 AM 4/24/2003, jimmy_huang wrote:
Hi ,
In Ser's Makefile.defs , originally , it define PKG_MALLOC , SHM_MEM ,
SHM_MMAP ,for shared memory,
and I would like to marked it , cause i want to try let it not use shared
memory
(and modified ser.cfg let it just produce one main parent process )
I tried marked those three definitions , but it has error when compile ,
it seems some modules still need functions which only exist when those three
definitions is defined,
do those three definitions can't marked?
or in ser , it can't work without using shared memory , can't mark those
definition?
Thanks ,
Jimmy
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
--
Jiri Kuthan http://iptel.org/~jiri/
7885
days inactive
7885
days old
2 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
jimmy_huang -
Jiri Kuthan -
Nils Ohlmeier