Hi All.
Should consume_credentials() remove the Proxy-Authorization header from my SIP messages before I t_relay() them?
If not, how should I remove the header? Use remove_hf() ?
Regards, Paul
Yes, consume_credentials should remove them.
Jan.
On 16-03 08:52, Java Rockx wrote:
Hi All.
Should consume_credentials() remove the Proxy-Authorization header from my SIP messages before I t_relay() them?
If not, how should I remove the header? Use remove_hf() ?
Regards, Paul
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Yes, that's what I thought. But the documentation does say that www_authorize() or proxy_authorize() must be called prior to consume_credentials().
In my case I see the Proxy-Authorization header in ACK and BYE messages, so calling www_authorize() or proxy_authorize() isn't called and consume_credentials() doesn't appear to remove the header in these cases.
It does work when processing INVITE messages, however.
Regards, Paul
On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 12:51:56 -0500, Jan Janak jan@iptel.org wrote:
Yes, consume_credentials should remove them.
Jan.
On 16-03 08:52, Java Rockx wrote:
Hi All.
Should consume_credentials() remove the Proxy-Authorization header from my SIP messages before I t_relay() them?
If not, how should I remove the header? Use remove_hf() ?
Regards, Paul
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
OK, I got the point. I will extend consume_credentials and add a parameter where you could specify the realm of the credentials to be removed so that there would be no need to call www_authorize or proxy_authorize before.
In the meantime you can achieve similar functionality using remove_hf from textops module (provided that there are only one digest credentials in the message which is quite common).
Jan.
On 16-03 13:12, Java Rockx wrote:
Yes, that's what I thought. But the documentation does say that www_authorize() or proxy_authorize() must be called prior to consume_credentials().
In my case I see the Proxy-Authorization header in ACK and BYE messages, so calling www_authorize() or proxy_authorize() isn't called and consume_credentials() doesn't appear to remove the header in these cases.
It does work when processing INVITE messages, however.
Regards, Paul
On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 12:51:56 -0500, Jan Janak jan@iptel.org wrote:
Yes, consume_credentials should remove them.
Jan.
On 16-03 08:52, Java Rockx wrote:
Hi All.
Should consume_credentials() remove the Proxy-Authorization header from my SIP messages before I t_relay() them?
If not, how should I remove the header? Use remove_hf() ?
Regards, Paul
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Thanks Jan. remove_hf() is exactly what I resorted to.
Regards, Paul
On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 04:51:13 -0500, Jan Janak jan@iptel.org wrote:
OK, I got the point. I will extend consume_credentials and add a parameter where you could specify the realm of the credentials to be removed so that there would be no need to call www_authorize or proxy_authorize before.
In the meantime you can achieve similar functionality using remove_hf from textops module (provided that there are only one digest credentials in the message which is quite common).
Jan.
On 16-03 13:12, Java Rockx wrote:
Yes, that's what I thought. But the documentation does say that www_authorize() or proxy_authorize() must be called prior to consume_credentials().
In my case I see the Proxy-Authorization header in ACK and BYE messages, so calling www_authorize() or proxy_authorize() isn't called and consume_credentials() doesn't appear to remove the header in these cases.
It does work when processing INVITE messages, however.
Regards, Paul
On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 12:51:56 -0500, Jan Janak jan@iptel.org wrote:
Yes, consume_credentials should remove them.
Jan.
On 16-03 08:52, Java Rockx wrote:
Hi All.
Should consume_credentials() remove the Proxy-Authorization header from my SIP messages before I t_relay() them?
If not, how should I remove the header? Use remove_hf() ?
Regards, Paul
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Just curious, under what situation did you get Proxy-Authorization header with ACK? I never saw one before and am interested to know.
Yes, that's what I thought. But the documentation does say that www_authorize() or proxy_authorize() must be called prior to consume_credentials().
In my case I see the Proxy-Authorization header in ACK and BYE messages, so calling www_authorize() or proxy_authorize() isn't called and consume_credentials() doesn't appear to remove the header in these cases.
It does work when processing INVITE messages, however.
Regards, Paul
On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 12:51:56 -0500, Jan Janak jan@iptel.org wrote:
Yes, consume_credentials should remove them.
Jan.
On 16-03 08:52, Java Rockx wrote:
Hi All.
Should consume_credentials() remove the
Proxy-Authorization header
from my SIP messages before I t_relay() them?
If not, how should I remove the header? Use remove_hf() ?
Regards, Paul
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Zeus,
Here is a call log between two SIP phones on my SER proxy.
I am using remove_hf("Proxy-Authorization") before I t_relay() the message, so you will see the Proxy-Authorization in the header between my SIP Phone and SER.
Also, note that my SER proxy sits behind a Cisco 3600 so the ALG in Cisco rewrites the 10.3.0.0 network addresses.
I've got no idea why the ACK contains the Proxy-Auth header, unless it is a bug in my Grandstream phone. Who knows.
Regards, Paul
On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 00:31:50 +1100, Zeus Ng zeus.ng@isquare.com.au wrote:
Just curious, under what situation did you get Proxy-Authorization header with ACK? I never saw one before and am interested to know.
Yes, that's what I thought. But the documentation does say that www_authorize() or proxy_authorize() must be called prior to consume_credentials().
In my case I see the Proxy-Authorization header in ACK and BYE messages, so calling www_authorize() or proxy_authorize() isn't called and consume_credentials() doesn't appear to remove the header in these cases.
It does work when processing INVITE messages, however.
Regards, Paul
On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 12:51:56 -0500, Jan Janak jan@iptel.org wrote:
Yes, consume_credentials should remove them.
Jan.
On 16-03 08:52, Java Rockx wrote:
Hi All.
Should consume_credentials() remove the
Proxy-Authorization header
from my SIP messages before I t_relay() them?
If not, how should I remove the header? Use remove_hf() ?
Regards, Paul
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
O.K., I see. There is no bug with your Grandstream. It's caching the credential, which is allowed in RFC.
Thanks.
Zeus,
Here is a call log between two SIP phones on my SER proxy.
I am using remove_hf("Proxy-Authorization") before I t_relay() the message, so you will see the Proxy-Authorization in the header between my SIP Phone and SER.
Also, note that my SER proxy sits behind a Cisco 3600 so the ALG in Cisco rewrites the 10.3.0.0 network addresses.
I've got no idea why the ACK contains the Proxy-Auth header, unless it is a bug in my Grandstream phone. Who knows.
Regards, Paul
On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 00:31:50 +1100, Zeus Ng zeus.ng@isquare.com.au wrote:
Just curious, under what situation did you get Proxy-Authorization header with ACK? I never saw one before and am interested to know.
Yes, that's what I thought. But the documentation does say that www_authorize() or proxy_authorize() must be called prior to consume_credentials().
In my case I see the Proxy-Authorization header in ACK and BYE messages, so calling www_authorize() or proxy_authorize() isn't called and consume_credentials() doesn't appear to remove
the header
in these cases.
It does work when processing INVITE messages, however.
Regards, Paul
On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 12:51:56 -0500, Jan Janak
jan@iptel.org wrote:
Yes, consume_credentials should remove them.
Jan.
On 16-03 08:52, Java Rockx wrote:
Hi All.
Should consume_credentials() remove the
Proxy-Authorization header
from my SIP messages before I t_relay() them?
If not, how should I remove the header? Use remove_hf() ?
Regards, Paul
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
To have a functionnal ser server...
Any professional is welcome.
Just tell me how much, i am fed up to waste my time on ser, but i am sure it has to work, i am just to noob.
I need ser working with acc, nat traversal, serweb,... All the features that makes Ser usable for a business.
Waiting for quotes
Regards,
Olivier
-
Jan Janak -
Java Rockx -
Olivier Taylor -
Zeus Ng