hello friends iam using currently ser-0.8.12 and it s working properly except with cpl where when i run the patch with patch -p0<modules/cpl-c/tm.patch ******************************************************* patching file modules/tm/h_table.c patching file modules/tm/h_table.h Hunk #1 succeeded at 190 (offset 1 line). patching file modules/tm/t_fwd.c patching file modules/tm/t_hooks.c patching file modules/tm/t_hooks.h patching file modules/tm/t_lookup.c patching file modules/tm/t_reply.c Hunk #3 FAILED at 437. Hunk #4 FAILED at 462. Hunk #5 succeeded at 653 (offset 16 lines). Hunk #7 succeeded at 953 (offset 16 lines). Hunk #9 succeeded at 1040 (offset 16 lines). Hunk #11 succeeded at 1129 (offset 16 lines). 2 out of 11 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file modules/tm/t_reply.c.rej patching file modules/tm/t_reply.h patching file modules/tm/timer.c patching file modules/tm/tm.c patching file modules/tm/tm_load.c patching file modules/tm/tm_load.h ******************************************************* and then changing in the makefile by removing the cpl-c module name in the exclude modules. now my exlude modules are like this in the makefile ******************************************************* exclude_modules?= cpl ext extcmd \ postgres snmp \ im radius_acc radius_auth \ jabber ******************************************************* and then make again but it s not at all running the process giveng the error when i run the command ser ******************************************************* 0(7327) find_export: <t_on_reply> not found 0(7327) find_export: <t_on_reply> not found 0(7327) parse error (254,16-17): unknown command, missing loadmodule? 0(7327) find_export: <t_relay> not found 0(7327) find_export: <t_relay> not found 0(7327) parse error (258,15-16): unknown command, missing loadmodule? ******************************************************* and my ser.cfg is like this ******************************************************* debug=8 # debug level (cmd line: -dddddddddd) fork=yes log_stderror=yes # (cmd line: -E) /* Uncomment these lines to enter debugging mode fork=no log_stderror=yes */ check_via=no # (cmd. line: -v) dns=no # (cmd. line: -r) rev_dns=no # (cmd. line: -R) port=5060 children=4 fifo="/tmp/ser_fifo" fifo_mode=438 # ------------------ module loading ---------------------------------- # Uncomment this if you want to use SQL database loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/mysql.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/exec.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/sl.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/tm.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/rr.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/maxfwd.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/usrloc.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/registrar.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/textops.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/domain.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/cpl-c.so" # Uncomment this if you want digest authentication # mysql.so must be loaded ! loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/auth.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/auth_db.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/acc.so" # !! Nathelper loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/nathelper.so" # ----------------- setting module-specific parameters # -- usrloc params -- #modparam("usrloc", "db_mode", 0) # Uncomment this if you want to use SQL database # for persistent storage and comment the previous line modparam("usrloc", "db_mode", 2) # -- auth params -- # Uncomment if you are using auth module # modparam("auth_db", "calculate_ha1", yes) # # If you set "calculate_ha1" parameter to yes (which true in this config), # uncomment also the following parameter) # modparam("auth_db", "password_column", "password") modparam("usrloc","db_url","mysql://ser:heslo@127.0.0.1:3306/ser") modparam("acc", "log_level", 1) modparam("acc", "log_flag", 1) modparam("acc", "db_flag", 1) modparam("acc", "db_missed_flag", 2) modparam("acc", "log_fmt", "miocfst") modparam("acc", "failed_transactions" ,1) #modparam("acc", "radius_flag", 1) # -- rr params -- # add value to ;lr param to make some broken UAs happy modparam("rr", "enable_full_lr", 1) # !! Nathelper modparam("registrar", "nat_flag", 6) modparam("nathelper", "natping_interval", 30) # Ping interval 30 s modparam("nathelper", "ping_nated_only", 1) # Ping only clients behind NAT # ------------------------- request routing logic ------------------- # main routing logic route{ # initial sanity checks -- messages with # max_forwards==0, or excessively long requests if (!mf_process_maxfwd_header("10")) { sl_send_reply("483","Too Many Hops"); break; }; if (msg:len >= max_len ) { sl_send_reply("513", "Message too big"); break; }; # !! Nathelper # Special handling for NATed clients; first, NAT test is # executed: it looks for via!=received and RFC1918 addresses # in Contact (may fail if line-folding is used); also, # the received test should, if completed, should check all # vias for rpesence of received if (nat_uac_test("3")) { # Allow RR-ed requests, as these may indicate that # a NAT-enabled proxy takes care of it; unless it is # a REGISTER if (method == "REGISTER" || ! search("^Record-Route:")) { log("LOG: Someone trying to register from private IP, rewriting\n"); # This will work only for user agents that support symmetric # communication. We tested quite many of them and majority is # smart enough to be symmetric. In some phones it takes a configuration # option. With Cisco 7960, it is called NAT_Enable=Yes, with kphone it is # called "symmetric media" and "symmetric signalling". fix_nated_contact(); # Rewrite contact with source IP of signalling if (method == "INVITE") { fix_nated_sdp("1"); # Add direction=active to SDP }; force_rport(); # Add rport parameter to topmost Via setflag(6); # Mark as NATed }; }; setflag(1); setflag(2); # we record-route all messages -- to make sure that # subsequent messages will go through our proxy; that's # particularly good if upstream and downstream entities # use different transport protocol if (!method=="REGISTER") record_route(); # subsequent messages withing a dialog should take the # path determined by record-routing if (loose_route()) { # mark routing logic in request append_hf("P-hint: rr-enforced\r\n"); route(1); break; }; if (!uri==myself) { # mark routing logic in request append_hf("P-hint: outbound\r\n"); route(1); break; }; # if the request is for other domain use UsrLoc # (in case, it does not work, use the following command # with proper names and addresses in it) # if (uri==myself) { # # if (method=="REGISTER") { if ( method == "REGISTER" || method=="INVITE" || method=="BYE" || method == "CANCEL" ) { # save messages in mysql for CDRTool exec_msg("/usr/local/etc/ser/sertrace.py; exit 1"); }; #end of cdrtool # Uncomment this if you want to use digest authentication if (uri==myself) { if (method=="REGISTER") { if (!www_authorize("server.pol.net.in", "subscriber")) { www_challenge("server.pol.net.in", "0"); break; }; save("location"); break; }; if (method=="INVITE") { log(1, "INVITE\n"); setflag(1); /* set for accounting (the same value as in log_flag!) */ }; if (method=="MESSAGE") { log(1, "MESSAGE\n"); setflag(1); /* set for accounting (the same value as in log_flag!) */ }; if ( method=="BYE" || method=="CANCEL" ) { log (1, "BYE or CANCEL\n"); setflag(1); }; lookup("aliases"); if (!uri==myself) { append_hf("P-hint: outbound alias\r\n"); route(1); break; }; # native SIP destinations are handled using our USRLOC DB if (!lookup("location")) { sl_send_reply("404", "Not Found"); break; }; }; append_hf("P-hint: usrloc applied\r\n"); route(1); } route[1] { # !! Nathelper if (uri=~"[@:](192\.168\.|10\.|172\.(1[6-9]|2[0-9]|3[0-1])\.)" && !search("^Route:")){ sl_send_reply("479", "We don't forward to private IP addresses"); break; }; # if client or server know to be behind a NAT, enable relay if (isflagset(6)) { force_rtp_proxy(); }; # NAT processing of replies; apply to all transactions (for example, # re-INVITEs from public to private UA are hard to identify as # NATed at the moment of request processing); look at replies t_on_reply("1"); # send it out now; use stateful forwarding as it works reliably # even for UDP2TCP if (!t_relay()) { sl_reply_error(); }; } # !! Nathelper onreply_route[1] { # NATed transaction ? if (isflagset(6) && status =~ "(183)|2[0-9][0-9]") { fix_nated_contact(); force_rtp_proxy(); # otherwise, is it a transaction behind a NAT and we did not # know at time of request processing ? (RFC1918 contacts) } else if (nat_uac_test("1")) { fix_nated_contact(); }; } ******************************************************* does this patch problem has been sorted out in the ser-0.8.14 version can we directly implement the cpl-c option? your help will be greatly appreciated with regards serdiehard __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - 100MB free storage! http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail