6 Aug
2004
6 Aug
'04
5:46 p.m.
UAC -> SER -> ProxyWithTimer -> UAS
Both UAC and UAS do not support session timers, or session refresh requests.
However, ProxyWithTimer is losing call state after 30 minutes.
The only thing I can control is SER. The piece I read
"draft-ietf-sip-session-timer-13.html" suggests that it should only be
implemented at UAC or UAS. So am I restricted to using SER as B2BUA,
or would it be theoretically possible to implement this in stateful
proxy mode, without the UAC's cooperation? (The CSeq will be out of
sync, which gets kludgey)
Jamie Yukes
8 Aug
8 Aug
11:45 a.m.
If neither of the UAs support session timer then IMHO the only option is
B2BUA. I would recommend you to complain to the administrator of
ProxyWithTimer since calls longer than 30 minutes are pretty common.
Jan.
On 06-08 10:46, Jamie Yukes wrote:
UAC -> SER -> ProxyWithTimer -> UAS
Both UAC and UAS do not support session timers, or session refresh requests.
However, ProxyWithTimer is losing call state after 30 minutes.
The only thing I can control is SER. The piece I read
"draft-ietf-sip-session-timer-13.html" suggests that it should only be
implemented at UAC or UAS. So am I restricted to using SER as B2BUA,
or would it be theoretically possible to implement this in stateful
proxy mode, without the UAC's cooperation? (The CSeq will be out of
sync, which gets kludgey)
Jamie Yukes
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
7411
days inactive
7413
days old
1 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Jamie Yukes -
Jan Janak