Send sr-users mailing list submissions to sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to sr-users-request(a)lists.sip-router.org You can reach the person managing the list at sr-users-owner(a)lists.sip-router.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of sr-users digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Destination Timeout (ACK message) (Al S) 2. Proxy configuration (Jignesh Gandhi) 3. Re: Proxy configuration (Alex Balashov) 4. Local Kamailio share a hosted Kamailio/Asterisk sip server (S?bastien Brice) 5. SQlite DB Lock with Presence (Kristian Kielhofner) 6. Kamailio local and hosted (S?bastien Brice) 7. Re: Releasing Kamailio v4.4.0 (Daniel-Constantin Mierla) 8. Re: SQlite DB Lock with Presence (Daniel-Constantin Mierla) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 09:27:56 -0400 From: Al S &lt;alirsm(a)outlook.com&gt; To: &quot;sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org&quot; &lt;sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org&gt; Subject: [SR-Users] Destination Timeout (ACK message) Message-ID: &lt;BAY177-W1513432E7A3AFDAAB1DE8DD4870(a)phx.gbl&gt; Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Hi, The destination node is down. By adding the following code Kamailo re-routing INVITE to a new destination after getting 408 timeout (as below). failure_route[MANAGE_FAILURE]{ if (t_branch_timeout()) { # change to new destination IP $rd = "10.10.10.10"; t_relay(); exit; }...} However, the ACK message coming from source is still being send to the old destination. How can I reroute other messages in the dialog to be sent to this new destination.. Thank, AS -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20160329/b91e2df1/attachment-0001.html> ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 14:24:01 +0000 From: Jignesh Gandhi &lt;Jignesh.Gandhi(a)MoviusCorp.com&gt; To: &quot;sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org&quot; &lt;sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org&gt; Subject: [SR-Users] Proxy configuration Message-ID: &lt;011222F3-5820-41FB-A0D8-8D727EA121FA(a)moviuscorp.com&gt; Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Hello, Is it possible to use kamailio to be a stateful outbound proxy ? The use case is kamailio is an outbound proxy for multiple instances of Asterisk. Thus all responses need to go back to the same instance of Asterisk that generated them. After the call is established. How can I ensure that the Re-Invites, BYEs, etc are sent to the same instance of Asterisk that generated the outbound Invite ? Any help is appreciated. Thanks, --Jignesh -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20160329/5081718c/attachment-0001.html> ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 10:29:19 -0400 From: Alex Balashov &lt;abalashov(a)evaristesys.com&gt; To: sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Proxy configuration Message-ID: &lt;56FA913F.6080903(a)evaristesys.com&gt; Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Jignesh, Everything you're asking for is part of Kamailio's core functionality: 1. Most useful applications of Kamailio involve stateful relay, and the stock included configurations are stateful. 2. The loose-routing section of the configuration, and, more broadly, RFC 3261 in general, take care of routing in-dialog requests (ACKs, reinvites, BYEs, etc.) to the appropriate dialog party. 3. Load-balancing/distribution among Asterisk instances can be done with the 'dispatcher' module; there are many examples floating around, as it's one of the most common applications for Kamailio. -- Alex -- Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC 1447 Peachtree Street NE, Suite 700 Atlanta, GA 30309 United States Tel: +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free) / +1-678-954-0671 (direct) Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.csrpswitch.com/ ------------------------------ Message: 4 Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 16:32:36 +0200 (CEST) From: S?bastien Brice &lt;sebastien.brice(a)jvs.fr&gt; To: sr-users &lt;sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org&gt; Subject: [SR-Users] Local Kamailio share a hosted Kamailio/Asterisk sip server Message-ID: &lt;2011796741.12246629.1459261956126.JavaMail.zimbra(a)jvs.fr&gt; Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Hi everyone At my workplace there's plenty of hardphone directly connected to an hosted sbc in the cloud. As an added value i proposed to add locally Kamailio as a proxy server to 'federate' all the sip traffic. ipphone behind nat (A) <---> sip proxy local 192.168.x.x (B)<----> sbc registrar (mydomain.com) and sip proxy with public IP (C) when hardphone try to register, B rewrite (with rewritehost) the ip public of (C). B then uses exported function of TM to t_relay_to(C). to route INVITE?from A to C i use proxy_authenticate("mydomain.com") function (on B) from auth_db to pass the calls inbetween. This works well, but i am wondering if that makes sense if i get several phones behind B. Should stateless forward works better in this kind of scenario? In a near future i plan to offer disaster recovery, and i want all users binding to C (users(a)mydomain.com)instead bind on B (in case link B---C get down)and assume some kind of telephone functionnality Is that possible ? Do you have some sort of example Kamailio do it good On-premise/localy ? How to deal with nat since all hardphones have rfc1918?address? thx you PS: as an sbc (C) i did setup kamailio/asterisk in a real-time configuration. S?bastien BRICE VoIP, Support et Int?gration ------------------------------ Message: 5 Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 20:50:14 -0400 From: Kristian Kielhofner &lt;kris(a)kriskinc.com&gt; To: "SIP Router - Kamailio (OpenSER) and SIP Express Router (SER) - Users Mailing List" &lt;sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org&gt; Subject: [SR-Users] SQlite DB Lock with Presence Message-ID: &lt;CAKDfjge4kLhdLjV5V7gsOOsLsdByeLgtwnqE-EEXHhxbVeV8Ag(a)mail.gmail.com&gt; Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hello everyone, I'm trying to use BLF with the config here (except with SQlite): http://kb.asipto.com/kamailio:presence:k43-blf BLF seems to work perfectly except after the call is ended I get "sqlite commit failed: database is locked" error messages as seen here: http://pastebin.com/xVijj98H BLF is then broken at this point. kamailio -v version: kamailio 4.3.5 (x86_64/linux) 950657 flags: STATS: Off, USE_TCP, USE_TLS, USE_SCTP, TLS_HOOKS, USE_RAW_SOCKS, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MEM, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, DBG_QM_MALLOC, USE_FUTEX, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT, USE_PTHREAD_MUTEX, USE_DNS_CACHE, USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR, USE_DST_BLACKLIST, HAVE_RESOLV_RES ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_LISTEN 16, MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535, DEFAULT PKG_SIZE 8MB poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select. id: 950657 compiled on 01:33:01 Mar 29 2016 with x86_64-openwrt-linux-gnu-gcc 4.8.3 Has anyone ever seen this before? Thanks! -- Kristian Kielhofner ------------------------------ Message: 6 Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 14:38:40 +0200 (CEST) From: S?bastien Brice &lt;sebastien.brice(a)jvs.fr&gt; To: sr-users &lt;sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org&gt; Subject: [SR-Users] Kamailio local and hosted Message-ID: &lt;1194659979.12170808.1459255120868.JavaMail.zimbra(a)jvs.fr&gt; Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Hi everyone At my workplace there's plenty of hardphone directly connected to an hosted sbc in the cloud. As an added value i proposed to add locally Kamailio as a proxy server to 'federate' all the sip traffic. ipphone behind nat (A) <---> sip proxy local 192.168.x.x (B)<----> sbc registrar (mydomain.com) and sip proxy with public IP (C) when hardphone try to register, B rewrite (with rewritehost) the ip public of (C). B then uses exported function of TM to t_relay_to(C). to route INVITE?from A to C i use proxy_authenticate("mydomain.com") function (on B) from auth_db to pass the calls inbetween. This works well, but i am wondering if that makes sense if i get several phones behind B. Should stateless forward works better in this kind of scenario? In a near future i plan to offer disaster recovery, and i want all users binding to C (users(a)mydomain.com)instead bind on B (in case link B---C get down)and assume some kind of telephone functionnality Is that possible ? Do you have some sort of example Kamailio do it good On-premise/localy ? How to deal with nat since all hardphones have rfc1918?address? , thx you PS: as an sbc (C) i did setup kamailio/asterisk in a real-time configuration. S?bastien BRICE VoIP, Support et Int?gration ------------------------------ Message: 7 Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 10:02:02 +0200 From: Daniel-Constantin Mierla &lt;miconda(a)gmail.com&gt; To: "Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List" &lt;sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org&gt;rg>, sr-dev &lt;sr-dev(a)lists.sip-router.org&gt;rg>, &quot;business(a)lists.kamailio.org&quot; &lt;business(a)lists.kamailio.org&gt; Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Releasing Kamailio v4.4.0 Message-ID: &lt;56FB87FA.8080304(a)gmail.com&gt; Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Hello, the final packaging for 4.4.0 is expected to start after 14:00UTC today. Backports to branch 4.4 can be done up to 12:00UTC, after that let's sync on sr-dev mailing list, because I will start testing how it builds on different platforms and it is good to have the a consistent source code. Cheers, Daniel On 29/03/16 09:04, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://www.asipto.com http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference, Berlin, May 18-20, 2016 - http://www.kamailioworld.com ------------------------------ Message: 8 Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 11:37:39 +0200 From: Daniel-Constantin Mierla &lt;miconda(a)gmail.com&gt; To: "Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List" &lt;sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org&gt; Subject: Re: [SR-Users] SQlite DB Lock with Presence Message-ID: &lt;56FB9E63.7040104(a)gmail.com&gt; Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Hello, not using sqlite here, but could be related to presence modules doing db transactions and not releasing the locks. Do you get the issue after the first call, or it runs for a while and at some point it breaks? Cheers, Daniel On 30/03/16 02:50, Kristian Kielhofner wrote: -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://www.asipto.com http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference, Berlin, May 18-20, 2016 - http://www.kamailioworld.com ------------------------------ Subject: Digest Footer _______________________________________________ sr-users mailing list sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users ------------------------------ End of sr-users Digest, Vol 130, Issue 29 *****************************************