Hello everyone,
I was wondering whether anyone knew what was going on with the following bug: http://developer.berlios.de/bugs/?func=detailbug&bug_id=2925&group_i...
For those not wanting to follow the links, this is a bug submitted by someone back in December wherein ser puts 'branch=0' in the Via header it creates for an ACK to a 200 OK Invite response.
I haven't seen any activity related to this, and it's affecting interoperability with one of our termination providers.
0.9.0 users, have you seen the same problem??
Cheers, Darryl
The bug report is invalid, ignore it. branch=0 in ACK to a 200 is perfectly valid according to RFC3261. Your termination provider must be using a buggy devices.
-jiri
At 07:04 PM 4/19/2005, Darryl H. Thomas wrote:
Hello everyone,
I was wondering whether anyone knew what was going on with the following bug: http://developer.berlios.de/bugs/?func=detailbug&bug_id=2925&group_i...
For those not wanting to follow the links, this is a bug submitted by someone back in December wherein ser puts 'branch=0' in the Via header it creates for an ACK to a 200 OK Invite response.
I haven't seen any activity related to this, and it's affecting interoperability with one of our termination providers.
0.9.0 users, have you seen the same problem??
Cheers, Darryl
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
-- Jiri Kuthan http://iptel.org/~jiri/
-
Darryl H. Thomas -
Jiri Kuthan