I am using record_route_advertised_address to insert a record route header with an SRV record. The header is added correctly and everything appears to be working fine however I get a CRITICAL log error when calling
record_route_advertised_address('INTERNAL_SRV');
2020-02-25T20:14:57.078235+00:00,ip-10-0-16-53: CRITICAL: cbbcfe06-d181-467c-bbf4-78772aa0562f 2 16777053 INVITE:<core> [core/msg_translator.c:514]: lump_check_opt(): null send socket 2020-02-25T20:14:57.078352+00:00,ip-10-0-16-53: CRITICAL: cbbcfe06-d181-467c-bbf4-78772aa0562f 2 16777053 INVITE:<core> [core/msg_translator.c:514]: lump_check_opt(): null send socket
Any ideas? I'm considering using insert_hf() to manually add it and bypass whatever check is failing. Thoughts? Thanks
Hello,
are those messages printed during the processing of the initial INVITE or when handling requests within dialog (re-INVITE, BYE, ...).
Cheers, Daniel
On 25.02.20 21:20, Daniel Greenwald wrote:
I am using record_route_advertised_address to insert a record route header with an SRV record. The header is added correctly and everything appears to be working fine however I get a CRITICAL log error when calling
record_route_advertised_address('INTERNAL_SRV');
2020-02-25T20:14:57.078235+00:00,ip-10-0-16-53: CRITICAL: cbbcfe06-d181-467c-bbf4-78772aa0562f 2 16777053 INVITE:<core> [core/msg_translator.c:514]: lump_check_opt(): null send socket 2020-02-25T20:14:57.078352+00:00,ip-10-0-16-53: CRITICAL: cbbcfe06-d181-467c-bbf4-78772aa0562f 2 16777053 INVITE:<core> [core/msg_translator.c:514]: lump_check_opt(): null send socket
Any ideas? I'm considering using insert_hf() to manually add it and bypass whatever check is failing. Thoughts? Thanks
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
They occur when calling it on responses to the initial INVITE, for example 183 and 200 OK.
On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 4:33 PM Daniel-Constantin Mierla miconda@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
are those messages printed during the processing of the initial INVITE or when handling requests within dialog (re-INVITE, BYE, ...).
Cheers, Daniel On 25.02.20 21:20, Daniel Greenwald wrote:
I am using record_route_advertised_address to insert a record route header with an SRV record. The header is added correctly and everything appears to be working fine however I get a CRITICAL log error when calling
record_route_advertised_address('INTERNAL_SRV');
2020-02-25T20:14:57.078235+00:00,ip-10-0-16-53: CRITICAL: cbbcfe06-d181-467c-bbf4-78772aa0562f 2 16777053 INVITE:<core> [core/msg_translator.c:514]: lump_check_opt(): null send socket 2020-02-25T20:14:57.078352+00:00,ip-10-0-16-53: CRITICAL: cbbcfe06-d181-467c-bbf4-78772aa0562f 2 16777053 INVITE:<core> [core/msg_translator.c:514]: lump_check_opt(): null send socket
Any ideas? I'm considering using insert_hf() to manually add it and bypass whatever check is failing. Thoughts? Thanks
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing Listsr-users@lists.kamailio.orghttps://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
-- Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.comwww.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio Advanced Training - March 9-11, 2020, Berlin - www.asipto.com Kamailio World Conference - April 27-29, 2020, in Berlin -- www.kamailioworld.com
Hi,
why are you calling record_route_advertised_address(..) on these replies or in-dialog requests? The record_route functions are usually used on initial dialog forming requests (INVITE, SUBSCRIBE etc..).
Cheers,
Henning
-- Henning Westerholt – https://skalatan.de/blog/ Kamailio services – https://gilawa.comhttps://gilawa.com/
From: sr-users sr-users-bounces@lists.kamailio.org On Behalf Of Daniel Greenwald Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2020 10:48 PM To: Daniel-Constantin Mierla miconda@gmail.com Cc: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org Subject: Re: [SR-Users] record_route_advertised_address causes null send socket error
They occur when calling it on responses to the initial INVITE, for example 183 and 200 OK.
On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 4:33 PM Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda@gmail.commailto:miconda@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello,
are those messages printed during the processing of the initial INVITE or when handling requests within dialog (re-INVITE, BYE, ...).
Cheers, Daniel On 25.02.20 21:20, Daniel Greenwald wrote: I am using record_route_advertised_address to insert a record route header with an SRV record. The header is added correctly and everything appears to be working fine however I get a CRITICAL log error when calling
record_route_advertised_address('INTERNAL_SRV');
2020-02-25T20:14:57.078235+00:00,ip-10-0-16-53: CRITICAL: cbbcfe06-d181-467c-bbf4-78772aa0562f 2 16777053 INVITE:<core> [core/msg_translator.c:514]: lump_check_opt(): null send socket 2020-02-25T20:14:57.078352+00:00,ip-10-0-16-53: CRITICAL: cbbcfe06-d181-467c-bbf4-78772aa0562f 2 16777053 INVITE:<core> [core/msg_translator.c:514]: lump_check_opt(): null send socket
Any ideas? I'm considering using insert_hf() to manually add it and bypass whatever check is failing. Thoughts? Thanks
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.orgmailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.comhttp://www.asipto.com
www.twitter.com/micondahttp://www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/micondahttp://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio Advanced Training - March 9-11, 2020, Berlin - www.asipto.comhttp://www.asipto.com
Kamailio World Conference - April 27-29, 2020, in Berlin -- www.kamailioworld.comhttp://www.kamailioworld.com
carrier<---->kamailioes<----->freeswitches I am sending a record route header with a private SRV in the direction of freeswitch boxes and removing it when sending packets to carrier. I am using a different (pubic) SRV in contact header being sent to the carrier.
On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 4:59 PM Henning Westerholt hw@skalatan.de wrote:
Hi,
why are you calling record_route_advertised_address(..) on these replies or in-dialog requests? The record_route functions are usually used on initial dialog forming requests (INVITE, SUBSCRIBE etc..).
Cheers,
Henning
--
Henning Westerholt – https://skalatan.de/blog/
Kamailio services – https://gilawa.com
*From:* sr-users sr-users-bounces@lists.kamailio.org *On Behalf Of *Daniel Greenwald *Sent:* Tuesday, February 25, 2020 10:48 PM *To:* Daniel-Constantin Mierla miconda@gmail.com *Cc:* Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org *Subject:* Re: [SR-Users] record_route_advertised_address causes null send socket error
They occur when calling it on responses to the initial INVITE, for example 183 and 200 OK.
On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 4:33 PM Daniel-Constantin Mierla < miconda@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello,
are those messages printed during the processing of the initial INVITE or when handling requests within dialog (re-INVITE, BYE, ...).
Cheers, Daniel
On 25.02.20 21:20, Daniel Greenwald wrote:
I am using record_route_advertised_address to insert a record route header with an SRV record. The header is added correctly and everything appears to be working fine however I get a CRITICAL log error when calling
record_route_advertised_address('INTERNAL_SRV');
2020-02-25T20:14:57.078235+00:00,ip-10-0-16-53: CRITICAL: cbbcfe06-d181-467c-bbf4-78772aa0562f 2 16777053 INVITE:<core> [core/msg_translator.c:514]: lump_check_opt(): null send socket 2020-02-25T20:14:57.078352+00:00,ip-10-0-16-53: CRITICAL: cbbcfe06-d181-467c-bbf4-78772aa0562f 2 16777053 INVITE:<core> [core/msg_translator.c:514]: lump_check_opt(): null send socket
Any ideas? I'm considering using insert_hf() to manually add it and bypass whatever check is failing. Thoughts?
Thanks
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com
www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio Advanced Training - March 9-11, 2020, Berlin - www.asipto.com
Kamailio World Conference - April 27-29, 2020, in Berlin -- www.kamailioworld.com
Hello,
so it is more about transparently replacing one header in both directions. You could probably implement something like this with the help of the dialog module, or more lightweight with the htable module and normal header texops operations. Maybe the topo* modules are also worth a look for you, but they might be doing too much in this scenario.
Cheers,
Henning
-- Henning Westerholt – https://skalatan.de/blog/ Kamailio services – https://gilawa.comhttps://gilawa.com/
From: Daniel Greenwald dgreenwald@gmail.com Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2020 11:39 PM To: Henning Westerholt hw@skalatan.de Cc: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org; Daniel-Constantin Mierla miconda@gmail.com Subject: Re: [SR-Users] record_route_advertised_address causes null send socket error
carrier<---->kamailioes<----->freeswitches I am sending a record route header with a private SRV in the direction of freeswitch boxes and removing it when sending packets to carrier. I am using a different (pubic) SRV in contact header being sent to the carrier.
On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 4:59 PM Henning Westerholt <hw@skalatan.demailto:hw@skalatan.de> wrote: Hi,
why are you calling record_route_advertised_address(..) on these replies or in-dialog requests? The record_route functions are usually used on initial dialog forming requests (INVITE, SUBSCRIBE etc..).
Cheers,
Henning
-- Henning Westerholt – https://skalatan.de/blog/ Kamailio services – https://gilawa.comhttps://gilawa.com/
From: sr-users <sr-users-bounces@lists.kamailio.orgmailto:sr-users-bounces@lists.kamailio.org> On Behalf Of Daniel Greenwald Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2020 10:48 PM To: Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda@gmail.commailto:miconda@gmail.com> Cc: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List <sr-users@lists.kamailio.orgmailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org> Subject: Re: [SR-Users] record_route_advertised_address causes null send socket error
They occur when calling it on responses to the initial INVITE, for example 183 and 200 OK.
On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 4:33 PM Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda@gmail.commailto:miconda@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello,
are those messages printed during the processing of the initial INVITE or when handling requests within dialog (re-INVITE, BYE, ...).
Cheers, Daniel On 25.02.20 21:20, Daniel Greenwald wrote: I am using record_route_advertised_address to insert a record route header with an SRV record. The header is added correctly and everything appears to be working fine however I get a CRITICAL log error when calling
record_route_advertised_address('INTERNAL_SRV');
2020-02-25T20:14:57.078235+00:00,ip-10-0-16-53: CRITICAL: cbbcfe06-d181-467c-bbf4-78772aa0562f 2 16777053 INVITE:<core> [core/msg_translator.c:514]: lump_check_opt(): null send socket 2020-02-25T20:14:57.078352+00:00,ip-10-0-16-53: CRITICAL: cbbcfe06-d181-467c-bbf4-78772aa0562f 2 16777053 INVITE:<core> [core/msg_translator.c:514]: lump_check_opt(): null send socket
Any ideas? I'm considering using insert_hf() to manually add it and bypass whatever check is failing. Thoughts? Thanks
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.orgmailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.comhttp://www.asipto.com
www.twitter.com/micondahttp://www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/micondahttp://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio Advanced Training - March 9-11, 2020, Berlin - www.asipto.comhttp://www.asipto.com
Kamailio World Conference - April 27-29, 2020, in Berlin -- www.kamailioworld.comhttp://www.kamailioworld.com
Hello,
if you control the freeswitches or change where they send traffic/receive traffic, then I recommend to use two listen parameters with advertise address, like:
listen=udp:my.ip.ad.dr:5060 advertise publicsrv:5060
listen=udp:my.ip.ad.dr:5080
and carriers will be linked to my.ip.ad.dr:5060, while for freeswitch you use udp:my.ip.ad.dr:5080. You can use force_send_socket()/set_send_socket() or $fs to enforce a specific socket for sending traffic (e.g., towards freeswitch or carriers).
There will be two record-route headers, but, besides enforcing sockets, everything else will be done automatically.
Cheers, Daniel
On 25.02.20 23:38, Daniel Greenwald wrote:
carrier<---->kamailioes<----->freeswitches I am sending a record route header with a private SRV in the direction of freeswitch boxes and removing it when sending packets to carrier. I am using a different (pubic) SRV in contact header being sent to the carrier.
On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 4:59 PM Henning Westerholt <hw@skalatan.de mailto:hw@skalatan.de> wrote:
Hi, why are you calling record_route_advertised_address(..) on these replies or in-dialog requests? The record_route functions are usually used on initial dialog forming requests (INVITE, SUBSCRIBE etc..). Cheers, Henning -- Henning Westerholt – https://skalatan.de/blog/ Kamailio services – https://gilawa.com <https://gilawa.com/> *From:* sr-users <sr-users-bounces@lists.kamailio.org <mailto:sr-users-bounces@lists.kamailio.org>> *On Behalf Of *Daniel Greenwald *Sent:* Tuesday, February 25, 2020 10:48 PM *To:* Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda@gmail.com <mailto:miconda@gmail.com>> *Cc:* Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List <sr-users@lists.kamailio.org <mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>> *Subject:* Re: [SR-Users] record_route_advertised_address causes null send socket error They occur when calling it on responses to the initial INVITE, for example 183 and 200 OK. On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 4:33 PM Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda@gmail.com <mailto:miconda@gmail.com>> wrote: Hello, are those messages printed during the processing of the initial INVITE or when handling requests within dialog (re-INVITE, BYE, ...). Cheers, Daniel On 25.02.20 21:20, Daniel Greenwald wrote: I am using record_route_advertised_address to insert a record route header with an SRV record. The header is added correctly and everything appears to be working fine however I get a CRITICAL log error when calling record_route_advertised_address('INTERNAL_SRV'); 2020-02-25T20:14:57.078235+00:00,ip-10-0-16-53: CRITICAL: cbbcfe06-d181-467c-bbf4-78772aa0562f 2 16777053 INVITE:<core> [core/msg_translator.c:514]: lump_check_opt(): null send socket 2020-02-25T20:14:57.078352+00:00,ip-10-0-16-53: CRITICAL: cbbcfe06-d181-467c-bbf4-78772aa0562f 2 16777053 INVITE:<core> [core/msg_translator.c:514]: lump_check_opt(): null send socket Any ideas? I'm considering using insert_hf() to manually add it and bypass whatever check is failing. Thoughts? Thanks _______________________________________________ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org <mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com <http://www.asipto.com> www.twitter.com/miconda <http://www.twitter.com/miconda> -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda <http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda> Kamailio Advanced Training - March 9-11, 2020, Berlin - www.asipto.com <http://www.asipto.com> Kamailio World Conference - April 27-29, 2020, in Berlin -- www.kamailioworld.com <http://www.kamailioworld.com>
Yes but 2 problems with this: 1) listen parameter does not seem to accept an SRV or hostname listen=udp:MYPRIVATEIP:EXTERNALPORT advertise EXTERNALHOSTNAME causes the listen line to be ignored
2) My goal is not to do any state replication so I only want the SRV in record-route not VIA. VIA will still have IP. These are very light configs (no Dialog or backends etc) If a kamailio goes away, an in-dialog request should still hit another kamailio and the call will progress as if nothing happened. (Yes, in-progress Transactions will still fail but that's acceptable vs cost of TM replication)
On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 3:31 AM Daniel-Constantin Mierla miconda@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
if you control the freeswitches or change where they send traffic/receive traffic, then I recommend to use two listen parameters with advertise address, like:
listen=udp:my.ip.ad.dr:5060 advertise publicsrv:5060
listen=udp:my.ip.ad.dr:5080
and carriers will be linked to my.ip.ad.dr:5060, while for freeswitch you use udp:my.ip.ad.dr:5080. You can use force_send_socket()/set_send_socket() or $fs to enforce a specific socket for sending traffic (e.g., towards freeswitch or carriers).
There will be two record-route headers, but, besides enforcing sockets, everything else will be done automatically.
Cheers, Daniel On 25.02.20 23:38, Daniel Greenwald wrote:
carrier<---->kamailioes<----->freeswitches I am sending a record route header with a private SRV in the direction of freeswitch boxes and removing it when sending packets to carrier. I am using a different (pubic) SRV in contact header being sent to the carrier.
On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 4:59 PM Henning Westerholt hw@skalatan.de wrote:
Hi,
why are you calling record_route_advertised_address(..) on these replies or in-dialog requests? The record_route functions are usually used on initial dialog forming requests (INVITE, SUBSCRIBE etc..).
Cheers,
Henning
--
Henning Westerholt – https://skalatan.de/blog/
Kamailio services – https://gilawa.com
*From:* sr-users sr-users-bounces@lists.kamailio.org *On Behalf Of *Daniel Greenwald *Sent:* Tuesday, February 25, 2020 10:48 PM *To:* Daniel-Constantin Mierla miconda@gmail.com *Cc:* Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org *Subject:* Re: [SR-Users] record_route_advertised_address causes null send socket error
They occur when calling it on responses to the initial INVITE, for example 183 and 200 OK.
On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 4:33 PM Daniel-Constantin Mierla < miconda@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello,
are those messages printed during the processing of the initial INVITE or when handling requests within dialog (re-INVITE, BYE, ...).
Cheers, Daniel
On 25.02.20 21:20, Daniel Greenwald wrote:
I am using record_route_advertised_address to insert a record route header with an SRV record. The header is added correctly and everything appears to be working fine however I get a CRITICAL log error when calling
record_route_advertised_address('INTERNAL_SRV');
2020-02-25T20:14:57.078235+00:00,ip-10-0-16-53: CRITICAL: cbbcfe06-d181-467c-bbf4-78772aa0562f 2 16777053 INVITE:<core> [core/msg_translator.c:514]: lump_check_opt(): null send socket 2020-02-25T20:14:57.078352+00:00,ip-10-0-16-53: CRITICAL: cbbcfe06-d181-467c-bbf4-78772aa0562f 2 16777053 INVITE:<core> [core/msg_translator.c:514]: lump_check_opt(): null send socket
Any ideas? I'm considering using insert_hf() to manually add it and bypass whatever check is failing. Thoughts?
Thanks
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com
www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio Advanced Training - March 9-11, 2020, Berlin - www.asipto.com
Kamailio World Conference - April 27-29, 2020, in Berlin -- www.kamailioworld.com
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.comwww.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio Advanced Training - March 9-11, 2020, Berlin - www.asipto.com Kamailio World Conference - April 27-29, 2020, in Berlin -- www.kamailioworld.com
-
Daniel Greenwald -
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -
Henning Westerholt