5 Aug
2005
5 Aug
'05
9:34 p.m.
Hello,
I'm with accounting in ser and I noticed, that in some calls the BYE message
doesn't reach my server. In the most cases yes, but in 5% of the cases not.
Is there any way to force the caller/callee to send the BYE message back?
Thanks!!
Sebastian
5 Aug
5 Aug
9:52 p.m.
nope, well not as far as I know, the gateway can though, if it detects
no traffic, but this is provider dependant
Iqbal
Sebastian Kühner wrote:
Hello,
I'm with accounting in ser and I noticed, that in some calls the BYE message
doesn't reach my server. In the most cases yes, but in 5% of the cases not.
Is there any way to force the caller/callee to send the BYE message back?
Thanks!!
Sebastian
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
.
6 Aug
6 Aug
12:21 a.m.
Hi,
Enable record-route on the proxy should force UAC send all signalling to the
proxy server. It helps proxy maintains all subsequent signaling on that
call. Unless incorrect implementation could fail proper closing of a call.
Regards,
Pat
----- Original Message -----
From: "Sebastian Kühner" <skuehner(a)veraza.com>
To: <serusers(a)lists.iptel.org>
Sent: Friday, August 05, 2005 7:34 PM
Subject: [Serusers] SIP messages timeout
Hello,
I'm with accounting in ser and I noticed, that in some calls the BYE
message
doesn't reach my server. In the most cases yes, but in 5% of the cases
not.
Is there any way to force the caller/callee to send the BYE message back?
Thanks!!
Sebastian
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
12:35 a.m.
There is an issue SERers should know. SER doesn't put record-route into
'status' message like 1890,183 or 200 OK. What I experienced is UA sent BYE
directly to remote softswitch rather than SER since our soft switch didn't
put record-route info into '180 ring' and '200 OK' so that UA though it
should send BYE directly to softswitch.
I asked my soft switch vendor to keep record-route in all messages if there
was record-route in 'INVITE'. UA started to send "BYE' to SER after my
vendor fix this problem.
My suggestion is to check id termination sides can always support
record-route.
Regards
Leon Sun
-----Original Message-----
From: serusers-bounces(a)iptel.org [mailto:serusers-bounces@lists.iptel.org] On
Behalf Of Pat Wang
Sent: Friday, August 05, 2005 2:21 PM
To: Sebastian Kühner; serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
Subject: Re: [Serusers] SIP messages timeout
Hi,
Enable record-route on the proxy should force UAC send all signalling to the
proxy server. It helps proxy maintains all subsequent signaling on that
call. Unless incorrect implementation could fail proper closing of a call.
Regards,
Pat
----- Original Message -----
From: "Sebastian Kühner" <skuehner(a)veraza.com>
To: <serusers(a)lists.iptel.org>
Sent: Friday, August 05, 2005 7:34 PM
Subject: [Serusers] SIP messages timeout
Hello,
I'm with accounting in ser and I noticed, that in some calls the BYE
message
doesn't reach my server. In the most cases yes, but in 5% of the cases
not.
Is there any way to force the caller/callee to send the BYE message back?
Thanks!!
Sebastian
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
12:41 a.m.
what softswitch was being used
Iqbal
Leon Sun wrote:
There is an issue SERers should know. SER doesn't
put record-route into
'status' message like 1890,183 or 200 OK. What I experienced is UA sent BYE
directly to remote softswitch rather than SER since our soft switch didn't
put record-route info into '180 ring' and '200 OK' so that UA though it
should send BYE directly to softswitch.
I asked my soft switch vendor to keep record-route in all messages if there
was record-route in 'INVITE'. UA started to send "BYE' to SER after my
vendor fix this problem.
My suggestion is to check id termination sides can always support
record-route.
Regards
Leon Sun
-----Original Message-----
From: serusers-bounces(a)iptel.org [mailto:serusers-bounces@lists.iptel.org] On
Behalf Of Pat Wang
Sent: Friday, August 05, 2005 2:21 PM
To: Sebastian Kühner; serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
Subject: Re: [Serusers] SIP messages timeout
Hi,
Enable record-route on the proxy should force UAC send all signalling to the
proxy server. It helps proxy maintains all subsequent signaling on that
call. Unless incorrect implementation could fail proper closing of a call.
Regards,
Pat
----- Original Message -----
From: "Sebastian Kühner" <skuehner(a)veraza.com>
To: <serusers(a)lists.iptel.org>
Sent: Friday, August 05, 2005 7:34 PM
Subject: [Serusers] SIP messages timeout
Hello,
I'm with accounting in ser and I noticed, that in some calls the BYE
message
doesn't reach my server. In the most cases yes, but in 5% of the cases
not.
Is there any way to force the caller/callee to send the BYE message back?
Thanks!!
Sebastian
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
.
7052
days inactive
7052
days old
4 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
Iqbal -
Leon Sun -
Pat Wang -
Sebastian Kühner