Has any one tried extending SER to load ser.cfg entries from database. My thought is that it would be really cool to put a web interface over SER to manage config entries. Any thoughts?
- Daryl
Daryl,
This is a matter of personal preference, but I'd say that the configuration options for functions like lookup() and proxy_authorize() are flexible enough that a dynamic ser.cfg is unnecessary. For particularly complex routing, or to access database systems that SER doesn't support natively, exec_dset() is very useful.
Of course, an equivalent of mod_perl's Apache::Registry for SER would be fantastic.
Alistair Cunningham, Integrics Ltd, +44 (0)7870 699 479 http://integrics.com/
Daryl Sanders wrote:
Has any one tried extending SER to load ser.cfg entries from database. My thought is that it would be really cool to put a web interface over SER to manage config entries. Any thoughts?
- Daryl
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
-
Alistair Cunningham -
Daryl Sanders