21 Mar
2007
21 Mar
'07
3:38 p.m.
You should keep cc-ing mailing lists, so people coming after a while,
with same issue, will be reading mail thread and see that the given
solution was right.
Thanks,
Daniel
On 03/20/07 21:42, Tim Madorma wrote:
Got it. thanks so much!
Tim
On 3/20/07, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <daniel(a)voice-system.ro> wrote:
Hello,
On 03/20/07 17:39, Tim Madorma wrote:
Hi,
I have put the OpenSER version 1.2 behind a BIG IP load balancer which
provides a static private IP address (10.1.1.20) via NAT to the
OpenSER. In our application, the clients will send to one of the three
public addresses that are defined as aliases:
alias="65.185.232.62:5061"
alias="65.185.232.62:5062"
alias="65.185.232.62:5063"
you have to remove quotes around the value of
alias parameters. As it is
now, the value between quotes is considered to be hostname.
alias=65.185.232.62:5061
alias=65.185.232.62:5062
alias=65.185.232.62:5063
Same case as it was reported by Juha, today with loose routing ...
Cheers,
Daniel
An incoming OPTIONS message is received with the host in the REQ URI
set to 65.185.232.62:5063 is received and when it hits this section of
openser.cfg:
if (!uri==myself) {
# mark routing logic in request
append_hf("P-hint: outbound\r\n");
route(1);
};
it executes within the if conditional and tries to route the OPTIONS
message. I am wondering why uri does not match myself. The debug
output from the log is as follows (it seems that the alias assignments
are not working):
Mar 19 16:41:11 homer openser[2267]: [ID 487083 local0.debug]
grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 13==9 && [65.185.232.62] == [1
0.1.1.20]
Mar 19 16:41:11 homer openser[2267]: [ID 375670 local0.debug]
grep_sock_info - checking if port 5061 matches port 5063
Mar 19 16:41:11 homer openser[2267]: [ID 487083 local0.debug]
grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 13==9 && [65.185.232.62] == [1
0.1.1.20]
Mar 19 16:41:11 homer openser[2267]: [ID 375670 local0.debug]
grep_sock_info - checking if port 5062 matches port 5063
Mar 19 16:41:11 homer openser[2267]: [ID 487083 local0.debug]
grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 13==9 && [65.185.232.62] == [1
0.1.1.20]
Mar 19 16:41:11 homer openser[2267]: [ID 375670 local0.debug]
grep_sock_info - checking if port 5063 matches port 5063
Mar 19 16:41:11 homer openser[2267]: [ID 140248 local0.debug]
DEBUG:check_self: host != me
Any suggestions? I have not tried this in any other version. Is this a
possible bug in 1.2?
thanks,
Tim
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)openser.org
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
21 Mar
21 Mar
3:43 p.m.
New subject: [Users] NAT Problem with OpenSER behind load balancer
Yup. This is how we can avoid having the same question posted over
and over again ....
Regards,
Ovidiu Sas
On 3/21/07, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <daniel(a)voice-system.ro> wrote:
You should keep cc-ing mailing lists, so people coming
after a while,
with same issue, will be reading mail thread and see that the given
solution was right.
Thanks,
Daniel
On 03/20/07 21:42, Tim Madorma wrote:
Got it. thanks so much!
Tim
On 3/20/07, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <daniel(a)voice-system.ro> wrote:
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)openser.org
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
Hello,
On 03/20/07 17:39, Tim Madorma wrote:
Hi,
I have put the OpenSER version 1.2 behind a BIG IP load balancer which
provides a static private IP address (10.1.1.20) via NAT to the
OpenSER. In our application, the clients will send to one of the three
public addresses that are defined as aliases:
alias="65.185.232.62:5061"
alias="65.185.232.62:5062"
alias="65.185.232.62:5063"
you have to remove quotes around the value of
alias parameters. As it is
now, the value between quotes is considered to be hostname.
alias=65.185.232.62:5061
alias=65.185.232.62:5062
alias=65.185.232.62:5063
Same case as it was reported by Juha, today with loose routing ...
Cheers,
Daniel
An incoming OPTIONS message is received with the host in the REQ URI
set to 65.185.232.62:5063 is received and when it hits this section of
openser.cfg:
if (!uri==myself) {
# mark routing logic in request
append_hf("P-hint: outbound\r\n");
route(1);
};
it executes within the if conditional and tries to route the OPTIONS
message. I am wondering why uri does not match myself. The debug
output from the log is as follows (it seems that the alias assignments
are not working):
Mar 19 16:41:11 homer openser[2267]: [ID 487083 local0.debug]
grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 13==9 && [65.185.232.62] == [1
0.1.1.20]
Mar 19 16:41:11 homer openser[2267]: [ID 375670 local0.debug]
grep_sock_info - checking if port 5061 matches port 5063
Mar 19 16:41:11 homer openser[2267]: [ID 487083 local0.debug]
grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 13==9 && [65.185.232.62] == [1
0.1.1.20]
Mar 19 16:41:11 homer openser[2267]: [ID 375670 local0.debug]
grep_sock_info - checking if port 5062 matches port 5063
Mar 19 16:41:11 homer openser[2267]: [ID 487083 local0.debug]
grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 13==9 && [65.185.232.62] == [1
0.1.1.20]
Mar 19 16:41:11 homer openser[2267]: [ID 375670 local0.debug]
grep_sock_info - checking if port 5063 matches port 5063
Mar 19 16:41:11 homer openser[2267]: [ID 140248 local0.debug]
DEBUG:check_self: host != me
Any suggestions? I have not tried this in any other version. Is this a
possible bug in 1.2?
thanks,
Tim
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)openser.org
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
5:38 p.m.
New subject: [Users] NAT Problem with OpenSER behind load balancer
Is this something new to 1.2? If yes it should be on the migration wiki
regards
klaus
Ovidiu Sas wrote:
Yup. This is how we can avoid having the same
question posted over
and over again ....
Regards,
Ovidiu Sas
On 3/21/07, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <daniel(a)voice-system.ro> wrote:
You should keep cc-ing mailing lists, so people
coming after a while,
with same issue, will be reading mail thread and see that the given
solution was right.
Thanks,
Daniel
On 03/20/07 21:42, Tim Madorma wrote:
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)openser.org
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)openser.org
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users Got it. thanks so much!
Tim
On 3/20/07, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <daniel(a)voice-system.ro> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 03/20/07 17:39, Tim Madorma wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have put the OpenSER version 1.2 behind a BIG IP load balancer
which
> > provides a static private IP address
(10.1.1.20) via NAT to the
> > OpenSER. In our application, the clients will send to one of the
three
> > public addresses that are defined as
aliases:
> >
> > alias="65.185.232.62:5061"
> > alias="65.185.232.62:5062"
> > alias="65.185.232.62:5063"
> you have to remove quotes around the value of alias parameters. As
it is
> now, the value between quotes is considered
to be hostname.
> alias=65.185.232.62:5061
> alias=65.185.232.62:5062
> alias=65.185.232.62:5063
>
> Same case as it was reported by Juha, today with loose routing ...
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel
>
> >
> > An incoming OPTIONS message is received with the host in the REQ URI
> > set to 65.185.232.62:5063 is received and when it hits this
section of
> > openser.cfg:
> >
> > if (!uri==myself) {
> > # mark routing logic in request
> > append_hf("P-hint: outbound\r\n");
> > route(1);
> > };
> >
> > it executes within the if conditional and tries to route the OPTIONS
> > message. I am wondering why uri does not match myself. The debug
> > output from the log is as follows (it seems that the alias
assignments
> > are not working):
> >
> >
> > Mar 19 16:41:11 homer openser[2267]: [ID 487083 local0.debug]
> > grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 13==9 && [65.185.232.62]
== [1
> > 0.1.1.20]
> > Mar 19 16:41:11 homer openser[2267]: [ID 375670 local0.debug]
> > grep_sock_info - checking if port 5061 matches port 5063
> > Mar 19 16:41:11 homer openser[2267]: [ID 487083 local0.debug]
> > grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 13==9 && [65.185.232.62]
== [1
> > 0.1.1.20]
> > Mar 19 16:41:11 homer openser[2267]: [ID 375670 local0.debug]
> > grep_sock_info - checking if port 5062 matches port 5063
> > Mar 19 16:41:11 homer openser[2267]: [ID 487083 local0.debug]
> > grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 13==9 && [65.185.232.62]
== [1
> > 0.1.1.20]
> > Mar 19 16:41:11 homer openser[2267]: [ID 375670 local0.debug]
> > grep_sock_info - checking if port 5063 matches port 5063
> > Mar 19 16:41:11 homer openser[2267]: [ID 140248 local0.debug]
> > DEBUG:check_self: host != me
> >
> >
> > Any suggestions? I have not tried this in any other version. Is
this a
>
possible bug in 1.2?
>
> thanks,
> Tim
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users(a)openser.org
> http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>
5:43 p.m.
New subject: [Users] NAT Problem with OpenSER behind load balancer
On 03/21/07 17:38, Klaus Darilion wrote:
Is this something new to 1.2? If yes it should be on
the migration wiki
Don't recall to be new in 1.2. Should be there since first
version of
openser, strange enough nobody got stuck so far.
Cheers,
Daniel
regards
klaus
Ovidiu Sas wrote:
Yup. This is how we can avoid having the same
question posted over
and over again ....
Regards,
Ovidiu Sas
On 3/21/07, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <daniel(a)voice-system.ro> wrote:
You should keep cc-ing mailing lists, so people
coming after a while,
with same issue, will be reading mail thread and see that the given
solution was right.
Thanks,
Daniel
On 03/20/07 21:42, Tim Madorma wrote:
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)openser.org
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users Got it. thanks so much!
Tim
On 3/20/07, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <daniel(a)voice-system.ro> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 03/20/07 17:39, Tim Madorma wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have put the OpenSER version 1.2 behind a BIG IP load
balancer which
> > provides a static private IP address
(10.1.1.20) via NAT to the
> > OpenSER. In our application, the clients will send to one of
the three
> > public addresses that are defined as
aliases:
> >
> > alias="65.185.232.62:5061"
> > alias="65.185.232.62:5062"
> > alias="65.185.232.62:5063"
> you have to remove quotes around the value of alias parameters.
As it is
> now, the value between quotes is considered
to be hostname.
> alias=65.185.232.62:5061
> alias=65.185.232.62:5062
> alias=65.185.232.62:5063
>
> Same case as it was reported by Juha, today with loose routing ...
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel
>
> >
> > An incoming OPTIONS message is received with the host in the
REQ URI
> > set to 65.185.232.62:5063 is received
and when it hits this
section of
> > openser.cfg:
> >
> > if (!uri==myself) {
> > # mark routing logic in request
> > append_hf("P-hint: outbound\r\n");
> > route(1);
> > };
> >
> > it executes within the if conditional and tries to route the
OPTIONS
> > message. I am wondering why uri does not
match myself. The debug
> > output from the log is as follows (it seems that the alias
assignments
> > are not working):
> >
> >
> > Mar 19 16:41:11 homer openser[2267]: [ID 487083 local0.debug]
> > grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 13==9 &&
[65.185.232.62]
== [1
> > 0.1.1.20]
> > Mar 19 16:41:11 homer openser[2267]: [ID 375670 local0.debug]
> > grep_sock_info - checking if port 5061 matches port 5063
> > Mar 19 16:41:11 homer openser[2267]: [ID 487083 local0.debug]
> > grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 13==9 &&
[65.185.232.62]
== [1
> > 0.1.1.20]
> > Mar 19 16:41:11 homer openser[2267]: [ID 375670 local0.debug]
> > grep_sock_info - checking if port 5062 matches port 5063
> > Mar 19 16:41:11 homer openser[2267]: [ID 487083 local0.debug]
> > grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 13==9 &&
[65.185.232.62]
== [1
> > 0.1.1.20]
> > Mar 19 16:41:11 homer openser[2267]: [ID 375670 local0.debug]
> > grep_sock_info - checking if port 5063 matches port 5063
> > Mar 19 16:41:11 homer openser[2267]: [ID 140248 local0.debug]
> > DEBUG:check_self: host != me
> >
> >
> > Any suggestions? I have not tried this in any other version. Is
this a
> > possible bug in 1.2?
> >
> > thanks,
> > Tim
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Users mailing list
> > Users(a)openser.org
> > http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
> >
>
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)openser.org
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
6457
days inactive
6457
days old
3 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -
Klaus Darilion -
Ovidiu Sas