Hi, Olaf!
Pls ignore the previous mail and refer to this as there's a typo error.
Oops, I accidentally deleted the semi-colon(;) at the closing of the IF
statement. I know that the SIP messages are routed according to the URI and
that's the reason why I need to change the URI (of the TO header). But I
just failed to change the uri at the TO header. Therefore, it couldn't route
to another SIP server.
Current FROM/TO uri that I get,
From : <sip:12345@mySER.net:5060>
To : <sip:88888888@mySER.net:5060>
The actual FROM/TO uri that I WANT will be,
From : <sip:12345@mySER.net:5060>
To : <sip:88888888@anotherSIP.net:5060>
I've checked on the regular expression, and it's fine with that. Am I using
the correct function - rewritehostport()?
Thanks.
Best regards,
Roa Yu
-----Original Message-----
From: Olaf Bergmann [mailto:Olaf.Bergmann@freenet-ag.de]
Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2007 3:07 PM
To: roayu
Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
Subject: Re: [Serusers] How SER communicate to other SIP server
roayu wrote:
Hi, Olaf!
I've used 'rewritehostport("sipB.net:5060")' under the INVITE
message
handler.
The following are my configuration, pls correct me if I'm wrong.
if(uri =~ "^sip:[0-9{8}@.*") {
if(!proxy_authorise("","subscriber")){
proxy_challenge("","0");
break;
}else if(!check_from()) {
sl_send_reply("403","Use From ID");
break;
};
consume_credentials();
rewritehostport("sipB.net:5060");
setflag(1);
route(1);
break;
}
When I dialed 8-digit of the number, it will pass to another SIP
server(sipB.net). But on the TO header, I still found that the TO address
still under the
sipSER.net. You may refer to the following.
From : <sip:12345@sipSER.net:5060>
To : <sip:88888888@sipSER.net:5060>
Does that means that it's still looping inside
sipSER.net instead of
routing
to sipB.net? If yes, how do I change the TO header or
make it route to
sipB.net?
No, SIP messages are routed according to their request URI. I am not
sure if the regular expression in your if-clause was corrupted by
the E-Mail service (if not, at least a closing bracket is missing).
I suggest, you start with a simplified version of this regexp to be
sure that the then-part is evaluated at all. Use xlog() to add a
couple of debug messages to find out which routing blocks are evaluated.
Regards,
Olaf
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers