Hello,
Yes, the INVITE goes to PORT 5060.
Here is my ngrep:
U 2005/08/02 15:43:56.584366 xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:51403 -> xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:5060 INVITE sip:10099999999999@xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:5060 SIP/2.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:5060;x-route-tag="tgrp:OutTrunkGroup". From: "anonymous" sip:54@xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx;tag=CEA94420-184A. To: sip:10099999999999@xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx. Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2005 18:43:56 GMT. Call-ID: 375AFBE2-2BC11DA-B615D293-1A0569D1@xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx. Supported: timer,100rel. Min-SE: 1800. Cisco-Guid: 927669769-45879770-3054686867-436562385. User-Agent: Cisco-SIPGateway/IOS-12.x. Allow: INVITE, OPTIONS, BYE, CANCEL, ACK, PRACK, COMET, REFER, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, INFO. CSeq: 101 INVITE. Max-Forwards: 6. Remote-Party-ID: sip:54@xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx;party=calling;screen=yes;privacy=full. Timestamp: 1123008236. Contact: sip:54@xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:5060. Expires: 180. Allow-Events: telephone-event. Content-Type: application/sdp. Content-Length: 382.
Thanks!
Sebastian
----- Original Message ----- From: "Miguel Angel Villar" mavilla@redvoiss.net To: "'Sebastian Kühner'" skuehner@veraza.com Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2005 7:38 PM Subject: RE: [Serusers] UDP
Did you chaeck that the INVITE messages from the Cisco server are send to UDP port 5060?.
MaV.-
-----Mensaje original----- De: Sebastian Kühner [SMTP:skuehner@veraza.com] Enviado el: Martes, 02 de Agosto de 2005 04:11 p.m. Para: serusers@lists.iptel.org Asunto: [Serusers] UDP
Hi!
I'm getting INVITES from another Cisco server, but my ser isn't catching it. The difference between a "normal message" (from one of our phones) is, that a dump shows us "UDP" like protocol (Cisco)... and SIP from our phones.
Do I have to respect different SIP signallings?? I made a log on "INVITES"... but ser isn't catching it :-(
Thanks!
Sebastian
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers