Re: [Serusers] ser and asterisk and rtpproxy - sr-users

2 Jul 2004

mawali(a)news.icns.com wrote:

...
  You must have noticed I have been asking this question
for last 4 days.  
 Yeah! :)

...
  Lets work together. 
ok!

...
  I do not force_rtp_proxy before t_relay_to_udp because
it breaks a lot 
 more things than just NAT'd clients. When I dont use force_rtp_proxy, 
 everything works, I can talk from NAT'd cleints to non-NAT'd, but 
 asterisk doenst work for clients through NAT. I have noticed that the 
 rtpproxy is still not getting engaged.

 I noticed that in a configuration like this
X-lite call 9916 -> on ser force_rtp_proxy(); and 
t_relay_to_udp("xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx","5090"); -> asterisk at 5090
ASTERISK send voice to RTPPROXY but XLITE send directly voice to 
ASTERISK instead RTPPROXY...

...
  So t_relay_to_udp is not what we need, it may be a
B2BUA. I wish 
 someone could give us a simple answer before we dive into it ourselves.

 B2BUA? What is that?

...
  Regards

 Thanks! Bye...

...
  On Thu, 1 Jul 2004, Aldo Armiento wrote:

  Hi all!
 I know the argument is very famouse, I think I have read all ser.cfg 
 on the net....
 The problem is that when I call extension 9916 I don't hear asterisk 
 music-on-old sound...

 The scenario:

 ser at port 5060
 asterisk at port 5090
 rtpproxy

 I would like that, when an UA (x-lite for example) call 9916 UA can 
 hear "music-on-hold" in asterisk.