23 Feb
2004
23 Feb
'04
3:01 p.m.
Hello,
I want to know if somebody has already tested the cisco PIX (with NAT and
SIP alg).
because when i use it with ser and record-route then BYE messages are not
correctly routed
Laurent
23 Feb
23 Feb
3:01 p.m.
Could you post SIP message dumps ?
Jan.
On 23-02 14:01, laurent Schweizer wrote:
Hello,
I want to know if somebody has already tested the cisco PIX (with NAT and
SIP alg).
because when i use it with ser and record-route then BYE messages are not
correctly routed
Laurent
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
4:10 p.m.
yes (ethereal dumps), the first is a local dump (on ser proxy ) and the
second is after the pix.
as you can see, the ip address of the record route in the invite is not
changed (after the pix), so i think that, the sip.eyepmedia.com proxy try to
send the bye request to this wrong address
-----Original Message-----
From: Jan Janak [mailto:jan@iptel.org]
Sent: lundi, 23. février 2004 14:01
To: laurent Schweizer
Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
Subject: Re: [Serusers] cisco pix and ser
Could you post SIP message dumps ?
Jan.
On 23-02 14:01, laurent Schweizer wrote:
Hello,
I want to know if somebody has already tested the cisco PIX (with NAT and
SIP alg).
because when i use it with ser and record-route then BYE messages are not
correctly routed
Laurent
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
25 Feb
25 Feb
6:18 p.m.
I do not see any record-route header fields in the second dumps. But my
ethereal complains about corrupted files, so maybe it does not display
all the messages.
Anyway, if the problem is PIX not rewriting Record-Route then I am
afraid I could not help you.
Jan.
On 23-02 15:10, laurent Schweizer wrote:
yes (ethereal dumps), the first is a local dump (on
ser proxy ) and the
second is after the pix.
as you can see, the ip address of the record route in the invite is not
changed (after the pix), so i think that, the sip.eyepmedia.com proxy try to
send the bye request to this wrong address
-----Original Message-----
From: Jan Janak [mailto:jan@iptel.org]
Sent: lundi, 23. février 2004 14:01
To: laurent Schweizer
Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
Subject: Re: [Serusers] cisco pix and ser
Could you post SIP message dumps ?
Jan.
On 23-02 14:01, laurent Schweizer wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I want to know if somebody has already tested the cisco PIX (with NAT and
> SIP alg).
>
> because when i use it with ser and record-route then BYE messages are not
> correctly routed
>
> Laurent
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
28 Feb
28 Feb
9:44 p.m.
My ethereal is fine and it indeed shows that the ALG left private IP addresses
in Record-routes -- i.e., follow-up requests are unroutable. There is indeed
nothing we can do about a misfunctioning ALG (imho, ALGs are conceptually
very suboptimal design).
-jiri
At 05:18 PM 2/25/2004, Jan Janak wrote:
I do not see any record-route header fields in the
second dumps. But my
ethereal complains about corrupted files, so maybe it does not display
all the messages.
Anyway, if the problem is PIX not rewriting Record-Route then I am
afraid I could not help you.
Jan.
On 23-02 15:10, laurent Schweizer wrote:
--
Jiri Kuthan http://iptel.org/~jiri/
yes (ethereal dumps), the first is a local dump
(on ser proxy ) and the
second is after the pix.
as you can see, the ip address of the record route in the invite is not
changed (after the pix), so i think that, the sip.eyepmedia.com proxy try to
send the bye request to this wrong address
-----Original Message-----
From: Jan Janak [mailto:jan@iptel.org]
Sent: lundi, 23. février 2004 14:01
To: laurent Schweizer
Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
Subject: Re: [Serusers] cisco pix and ser
Could you post SIP message dumps ?
Jan.
On 23-02 14:01, laurent Schweizer wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I want to know if somebody has already tested the cisco PIX (with NAT and
> SIP alg).
>
> because when i use it with ser and record-route then BYE messages are not
> correctly routed
>
> Laurent
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
7573
days inactive
7578
days old
4 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Jan Janak -
Jiri Kuthan -
laurent Schweizer