11 Nov
2013
11 Nov
'13
9:02 a.m.
Hi list,
I have this structure
IP Phones -> Asterisk Client (LAN) -> (router) ->
Kamailio/RTPproxy(Internet) -> Asterisk (local from Kamailio) -> Trunk
SIP/Pstn
All is working well, I don't have problems with NAT and I managed about
6000 daily calls.
For a couple of months I've the next problem.The problem is that in the
Asterisk randomly received this message.
[Sep 29 04:04:29] NOTICE[3393] chan_sip.c: Peer 'kamONOp' is now Lagged.
(2075ms / 2000ms)
[Sep 29 04:04:41] NOTICE[3393] chan_sip.c: Peer 'kamailioONO' is now
Reachable. (1888ms / 2000ms)
In some Asterisk Client I get this message 10 times in a hour, and usually
coincide with periods of high load on the kamailo.
Also I am getting these messages in the log of Kamailio:
Nov 11 08:59:53 c1 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[8079]: INFO: <core>
[forward.c:788]: broken reply to forward - no 2nd via
Nov 11 08:59:53 c1 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[8082]: INFO: <core>
[forward.c:788]: broken reply to forward - no 2nd via
Are these two issues related?
Whay can I do?
Kind Regards
SiscoCS
(Sorry for my english)
11 Nov
11 Nov
11:31 a.m.
Hello,
On 11/11/13 9:02 AM, Francisco Casasempere wrote:
Hi list,
I have this structure
IP Phones -> Asterisk Client (LAN) -> (router) ->
Kamailio/RTPproxy(Internet) -> Asterisk (local from Kamailio) -> Trunk
SIP/Pstn
All is working well, I don't have problems with NAT and I managed
about 6000 daily calls.
For a couple of months I've the next problem.The problem is that in
the Asterisk randomly received this message.
[Sep 29 04:04:29] NOTICE[3393] chan_sip.c: Peer 'kamONOp' is now
Lagged. (2075ms / 2000ms)
[Sep 29 04:04:41] NOTICE[3393] chan_sip.c: Peer 'kamailioONO' is now
Reachable. (1888ms / 2000ms)
In some Asterisk Client I get this message 10 times in a hour, and
usually coincide with periods of high load on the kamailo.
might be related to the
response time to OPTIONS requests sent by
Asterisk. Be sure you reply to them quickly in kamailio.cfg.
Also I am getting these messages in the log of Kamailio:
Nov 11 08:59:53 c1 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[8079]: INFO: <core>
[forward.c:788]: broken reply to forward - no 2nd via
Nov 11 08:59:53 c1 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[8082]: INFO: <core>
[forward.c:788]: broken reply to forward - no 2nd via
Are these two issues related?
This is info message, not an error at all. It means
that the sip reply
processed is very likely for a local request. I guess you have an older
version of kamailio, the log message is different to suggest better the
situation, as it is not a broken reply.
Cheers,
Daniel
Whay can I do?
Kind Regards
SiscoCS
(Sorry for my english)
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio Advanced Trainings - Berlin, Nov 25-28
- more details about Kamailio trainings at http://www.asipto.com -
12 Nov
12 Nov
12:35 p.m.
I think I've caught!
I capture this packet sended by Asterisk.
#
U 2013/11/12 11:01:56.613522 XX.XX:XX.XX:5060 -> YY:YY:YY:YY:5060
OPTIONS sip:XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXt SIP/2.0.
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.16.1.2:5060;branch=z9hG4bK2ad587ba;rport.
Max-Forwards: 70.
From: "Unknown" <sip:Unknown@172.16.1.2>;tag=as1fadd872.
To: <sip:XXXXXXXXXXXXt>.
Contact: <sip:Unknown@172.16.1.2>.
Call-ID: 57182fc0100063057d51b3d6680e1767(a)172.16.1.2.
CSeq: 102 OPTIONS.
User-Agent: FPBX-2.9.0(1.6.2.13).
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 10:01:52 GMT.
Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, INFO.
Supported: replaces, timer.
Content-Length: 0.
I think that Kamailio can't answer to this packet.
Maybe Asterisk have a bug?
I'm thinking about desactivate qualify in Asterisk.
What do you think?
Regards.
2013/11/11 Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com>
Hello,
On 11/11/13 9:02 AM, Francisco Casasempere wrote:
Hi list,
I have this structure
IP Phones -> Asterisk Client (LAN) -> (router) ->
Kamailio/RTPproxy(Internet) -> Asterisk (local from Kamailio) -> Trunk
SIP/Pstn
All is working well, I don't have problems with NAT and I managed about
6000 daily calls.
For a couple of months I've the next problem.The problem is that in the
Asterisk randomly received this message.
[Sep 29 04:04:29] NOTICE[3393] chan_sip.c: Peer 'kamONOp' is now Lagged.
(2075ms / 2000ms)
[Sep 29 04:04:41] NOTICE[3393] chan_sip.c: Peer 'kamailioONO' is now
Reachable. (1888ms / 2000ms)
In some Asterisk Client I get this message 10 times in a hour, and
usually coincide with periods of high load on the kamailo.
might be related to the response time to OPTIONS requests sent by
Asterisk. Be sure you reply to them quickly in kamailio.cfg.
Also I am getting these messages in the log of Kamailio:
Nov 11 08:59:53 c1 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[8079]: INFO: <core>
[forward.c:788]: broken reply to forward - no 2nd via
Nov 11 08:59:53 c1 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[8082]: INFO: <core>
[forward.c:788]: broken reply to forward - no 2nd via
Are these two issues related?
This is info message, not an error at all. It means that the sip reply
processed is very likely for a local request. I guess you have an older
version of kamailio, the log message is different to suggest better the
situation, as it is not a broken reply.
Cheers,
Daniel
Whay can I do?
Kind Regards
SiscoCS
(Sorry for my english)
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing
listsr-users@lists.sip-router.orghttp://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.comhttp://twitter.com/#!/miconda -
http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio Advanced Trainings - Berlin, Nov 25-28
- more details about Kamailio trainings at http://www.asipto.com -
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
4035
days inactive
4036
days old
2 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -
Francisco Casasempere