It is interesting, but Windows Messenger is not as bad as you can think.
PA works with it (4.7, 5.1), but only UDP because of using maddr
extension in contacts if using TCP.
I think that there is "new" 4.7 release because I have downloaded it
about half an year ago and this version was much better than 5.1
downloaded some time before (for example unsubscriptions are done in
reasonable way instead of sending lots of messages at the end as done
before).
It doesn't use PUBLISH (it uses some SOAP call instead), but as soon as
will be PA able to do subscriptions to users it will hopefuly work. (PA
is prepared for it now, but this code must wait till perfomance issues
will be solved).
Most clients able to handle presence messages handle them in their own
way and have bugs in it, thus Messenger is really not the only one
client behaving a bit strange.
I'm not sure about version, but I think that 0.9.6 has too old presence
modules to be really working. I recommend to use presence snapshot
(
ftp://ftp.iptel.org/pub/ser/presence) or CVS version. Warning CVS
version doesn't correspond with "presence handbook" (text about presence
in SER) published on that FTP - some changes oin parameters were done,
new XCAP module, ...
Vaclav
On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 02:52:16PM +0700, Andrey Kouprianov wrote:
I dont think using Win Msgr for presence is a good
idea. It's old and
does not coply with the current standards. Maybe try using eyeBeam
instead.
On 5/3/06, Darko <darko(a)veze.net> wrote:
HI,
I'm trying to manage presence of Win Messenger UA, but stuck at very
beginning. Messenger doesn't send Expires in header and RFC3265 says it
SHOULD be there, but if isn't use default value for event package (?).
Ok, removed test (_m->expires==0) in function parse_hfs from subscribe.c
and
got response 200 OK (without Expires header and RFC says that there MUST be
one), and funny NOTIFY after that.
Source address of NOTIFY is from my second interface, not one that
communicate
with UA, but it seems that it isn't big problem. Big one is destination
port
which is chosen with, for me, unknown condition. So, only reply from UA
computer is ICMP port unreachable.
SER version is 0.9.6.
BRs, Darko
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers