hello,
I am using ser 0.8.14 with tm and acc modules and I have multiple "failure_route" blocks.
when the call setup takes longer the client sends a second invite with the same call-id which I see in accounting that is not logged (it is absorbed by tm module as a retransmission I think) everything is OK, but
the main route block is still executed for the retransmitted invite. is there a way I can configure ser not to execute the main routing block for the retransmitted invite ?
I have tried: --------------------------------------- if (!t_newtran()) { break; } OR if(t_lookup_request) { break; } --------------------------------------- in the main route block but I get: "WARNING: script writer didn't release transaction" and a "server error" at client side.
is 0.8.14 the latest "stable" version of ser ?
thanks, Razvan Radu
Hi,
I think you're looking for the wrong answer. Do you send back a "trying" message to client stating that ser is executing the first "invite" command?
Regards,
K. Aasaraai
-----Original Message----- From: Ser Users ser-users@list.coretech.ro To: serusers@lists.iptel.org Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 17:00:53 +0300 Subject: [Serusers] duplicate invite
hello,
I am using ser 0.8.14 with tm and acc modules and I have multiple "failure_route" blocks.
when the call setup takes longer the client sends a second invite with the same call-id which I see in accounting that is not logged (it is absorbed by tm module as a retransmission I think) everything is OK, but
the main route block is still executed for the retransmitted invite. is there a way I can configure ser not to execute the main routing block for the retransmitted invite ?
I have tried:
if (!t_newtran()) { break; } OR if(t_lookup_request) { break; }
in the main route block but I get: "WARNING: script writer didn't release transaction" and a "server error" at client side.
is 0.8.14 the latest "stable" version of ser ?
thanks, Razvan Radu
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers