12 Jan
2004
12 Jan
'04
8:12 p.m.
Hello,
For now I'm just interested in the S-CSCF because I want to make a lab
implementation of the IMS so I only need the functions of the Home Network.
P-CSCF is only need for roaming UE and I-CSCF can be optional.
Why you you say that the extentions to SER will not be small? Have you
already tried?
Regards,
João
-----Original Message-----
From: Kevin Chu [mailto:kevin.chu@viditec.com]
Sent: segunda-feira, 12 de Janeiro de 2004 17:03
To: Joao Sampaio
Cc: SER Users
Subject: RE: S-CSCF IMS
Hello,
As my understanding, I don't think it is possible to configure
SER to work as a S-CSCF without any modification.
On the other hand, I don't think the modification or extension
will be small for SER working as a S-CSCF in IMS.
I am just curious, but why you are interesting about using SER
as S-CSCF only? How about the others, like P-CSCF and I-CSCF?
Regards,
Kevin
----------------------------------------------------------
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 17:19:30 -0000
From: Joao Sampaio <est-j-sampaio(a)ptinovacao.pt>
Subject: [Serusers] S-CSCF IMS
To: "'serusers(a)lists.iptel.org'" <serusers(a)lists.iptel.org>
Message-ID:
<D397A7FACCC45A44A0A207FD892961EA08AEFD86(a)mail.intra.cet.pt>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Hello,
I want to ask if someone have already configured or have some idea how to
configure SER to behave as a S-CSCF from the UMTS Realease 5 IMS?
Thank you.
Joco Sampaio
15 Jan
15 Jan
3:45 p.m.
Hi Joao!
On Mon, 12 Jan 2004, Joao Sampaio wrote:
For now I'm just interested in the S-CSCF because
I want to make a lab
implementation of the IMS so I only need the functions of the Home Network.
Maybe you could specify a bit more, what kind of S-CSCF functionality you
want to implement with SER. Home functionality is a bit to wide ranged
to provide you with a useful answer.
P-CSCF is only need for roaming UE and I-CSCF can be
optional.
Just FYI:
According to 23.228 / 24.228 / 24.229 (3GPP IMS / Rel 5) the P-CSCF is
required even in non-roaming scenarios. Too many tasks have been loaded
to the P-CSCF. Of course, you might not need it in your lab scenarios or
emulate its funcitionality, depending on what you want to test.
Similar applies for I-CSCF, however you might easier get it skipped in
your lab / tests.
Why you you say that the extentions to SER will not be
small? Have you
already tried?
I agree with Kevin in general, that the extension to SER will not be
small, if you want to use SER for a fully functional S-CSCF (even without
roaming and without topology hiding). You might be able to replace partly
some functionaliy with SER, but again this depends on your test / lab
requirements.
cheers,
Bernie
Regards,
João
-----Original Message-----
From: Kevin Chu [mailto:kevin.chu@viditec.com]
Sent: segunda-feira, 12 de Janeiro de 2004 17:03
To: Joao Sampaio
Cc: SER Users
Subject: RE: S-CSCF IMS
Hello,
As my understanding, I don't think it is possible to configure
SER to work as a S-CSCF without any modification.
On the other hand, I don't think the modification or extension
will be small for SER working as a S-CSCF in IMS.
I am just curious, but why you are interesting about using SER
as S-CSCF only? How about the others, like P-CSCF and I-CSCF?
Regards,
Kevin
----------------------------------------------------------
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 17:19:30 -0000
From: Joao Sampaio <est-j-sampaio(a)ptinovacao.pt>
Subject: [Serusers] S-CSCF IMS
To: "'serusers(a)lists.iptel.org'" <serusers(a)lists.iptel.org>
Message-ID:
<D397A7FACCC45A44A0A207FD892961EA08AEFD86(a)mail.intra.cet.pt>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Hello,
I want to ask if someone have already configured or have some idea how to
configure SER to behave as a S-CSCF from the UMTS Realease 5 IMS?
Thank you.
Joco Sampaio
7603
days inactive
7606
days old
1 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Bernie Hoeneisen -
Joao Sampaio