29 May
2005
29 May
'05
11:27 p.m.
Hello,
is it possible to use avp_write on the responses in failure route?
If yes, Contact header field could be evaluated and pushed into RURI,
then routing via route(x) to a new destination and finally solve the 3xx
forwarding issue.
Regards,
Martin
30 May
30 May
11:50 a.m.
Martin Koenig writes:
is it possible to use avp_write on the responses in
failure route?
i think so.
If yes, Contact header field could be evaluated and
pushed into RURI,
then routing via route(x) to a new destination and finally solve the 3xx
forwarding issue.
in theory yes, but when i implemented this, there was a patch to tm
module that assigned final reply to sip_msg structure field called
"final_reply". there is still no such field in current rel_0_9_0
sip_msg structure and i didn't see anything else either that could give
access to the reply contact header.
in summary: without access to reply message, there is no way to
implement this functionality.
-- juha
3 Jun
3 Jun
10:21 a.m.
Hello,
but it is possible with the current CVS head?
Regards,
Martin
Juha Heinanen wrote:
Martin Koenig writes:
is it possible to use avp_write on the responses
in failure route?
i think so.
If yes, Contact header field could be evaluated
and pushed into RURI,
then routing via route(x) to a new destination and finally solve the 3xx
forwarding issue.
in theory yes, but when i implemented this, there was a patch to tm
module that assigned final reply to sip_msg structure field called
"final_reply". there is still no such field in current rel_0_9_0
sip_msg structure and i didn't see anything else either that could give
access to the reply contact header.
in summary: without access to reply message, there is no way to
implement this functionality.
-- juha
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
7115
days inactive
7120
days old
3 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Juha Heinanen -
Martin Koenig