23 Aug
2009
23 Aug
'09
5:52 p.m.
I got confused:
Using Kamailio 1.4.3
uac_redirect is been used to handle diversion, also the draft expired
there is anew one http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-levy-sip-
diversion-10, is this used together with the diversion module, or no
need at all.
or is diversion module when you have customers registered in your
system?
I am do not have phones registered in my system at all, i use mainly
the CR module, and i need to allow diversion headers.
which one to use, or both?!
Also i am scare to use the diversion due the CDRs will create a new
record for that, who i will charge the call for?! :)
and if i use UAC_REDIRECT should i be able to use the avp $dip and the
following, from ROUTE to add to the accounting?
Diversion header URI
$di - reference to Diversion header URI
Diversion "privacy" parameter
$dip - reference to Diversion header “privacy” parameter value
Diversion "reason" parameter
$dir - reference to Diversion header “reason” parameter value
__________________________
O the Great
25 Aug
25 Aug
1:56 a.m.
Anyone :|
__________________________
O
On Aug 23, 2009, at 10:52 AM, Omar Mendoza wrote:
I got confused:
Using Kamailio 1.4.3
uac_redirect is been used to handle diversion, also the draft
expired there is anew one http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-levy-sip-diversion-10
, is this used together with the diversion module, or no need at all.
or is diversion module when you have customers registered in your
system?
I am do not have phones registered in my system at all, i use mainly
the CR module, and i need to allow diversion headers.
which one to use, or both?!
Also i am scare to use the diversion due the CDRs will create a new
record for that, who i will charge the call for?! :)
and if i use UAC_REDIRECT should i be able to use the avp $dip and
the following, from ROUTE to add to the accounting?
Diversion header URI
$di - reference to Diversion header URI
Diversion "privacy" parameter
$dip - reference to Diversion header “privacy” parameter value
Diversion "reason" parameter
$dir - reference to Diversion header “reason” parameter value
__________________________
O the Great
1 Sep
1 Sep
12:26 p.m.
On Sonntag, 23. August 2009, Omar Mendoza wrote:
I got confused:
Using Kamailio 1.4.3
Hi Omar,
i need also to ask you for a bit more details, as i got a bit confused as well
what you trying to achive. ;-)
uac_redirect is been used to handle diversion, also
the draft expired
there is anew one http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-levy-sip-
diversion-10, is this used together with the diversion module, or no
need at all.
or is diversion module when you have customers registered in your
system?
I am do not have phones registered in my system at all, i use mainly
the CR module, and i need to allow diversion headers.
which one to use, or both?!
If you just want to route messages with Diversion headers, you don't need to
do anything, the proxy will just route them as any other message.
Also i am scare to use the diversion due the CDRs will
create a new
record for that, who i will charge the call for?! :)
The acc module (if you use this for accounting) will not evaluate the
diversion header on its own.
and if i use UAC_REDIRECT should i be able to use the
avp $dip and the
following, from ROUTE to add to the accounting?
Diversion header URI
$di - reference to Diversion header URI
Diversion "privacy" parameter
$dip - reference to Diversion header “privacy” parameter value
Diversion "reason" parameter
$dir - reference to Diversion header “reason” parameter value
If there is a Diversion header in the message (with eventual parameters) you
could use this pseudo-variables to access it/ them.
Does this information helps you?
Henning
5:33 p.m.
Thank you for the Answer:
Our customer is sending call forwarding to a toll free number using
the diversion header
the scenario is :
customer---->proxy------>Kamailio----->carrier----->
not sure where the diversion have to touch the Kamailio, if kamailio
has only to pass through the headers, but i only got a 404 from the
carrier.
but not a 302 nor similar, what i know is we send the call, but i do
not have any additional traceback.
When i should use the UAC_redirect and.or Diversion modules?!
__________________________
o the small
On Sep 1, 2009, at 5:26 AM, Henning Westerholt wrote:
On Sonntag, 23. August 2009, Omar Mendoza wrote:
I got confused:
Using Kamailio 1.4.3
Hi Omar,
i need also to ask you for a bit more details, as i got a bit
confused as well what you trying to achive. ;-)
uac_redirect is been used to handle diversion,
also the draft
expired
there is anew one
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-levy-sip-
diversion-10, is this used together with the diversion module, or no
need at all.
or is diversion module when you have customers registered in your
system?
I am do not have phones registered in my system at all, i use mainly
the CR module, and i need to allow diversion headers.
which one to use, or both?!
If you just want to route messages with Diversion headers, you don't
need to do anything, the proxy will just route them as any other
message.
Also i am scare to use the diversion due the CDRs
will create a new
record for that, who i will charge the call for?! :)
The acc module (if you use this for accounting) will not evaluate
the diversion header on its own.
and if i use UAC_REDIRECT should i be able to use
the avp $dip and
the
following, from ROUTE to add to the accounting?
Diversion header URI
$di - reference to Diversion header URI
Diversion "privacy" parameter
$dip - reference to Diversion header “privacy” parameter value
Diversion "reason" parameter
$dir - reference to Diversion header “reason” parameter value
If there is a Diversion header in the message (with eventual
parameters) you could use this pseudo-variables to access it/ them.
Does this information helps you?
Henning
3 Sep
3 Sep
11:56 a.m.
On Dienstag, 1. September 2009, Omar wrote:
Our customer is sending call forwarding to a toll
free number using
the diversion header
the scenario is :
customer---->proxy------>Kamailio----->carrier----->
not sure where the diversion have to touch the Kamailio, if kamailio
has only to pass through the headers, but i only got a 404 from the
carrier.
but not a 302 nor similar, what i know is we send the call, but i do
not have any additional traceback.
When i should use the UAC_redirect and.or Diversion modules?!
Hi Omar,
have you tried to investigated why you get this 404 from the carrier?
The diversion module can only be used to add a new diversion header (something
that can also be done with textops, for example). The uac_redirect module can
be used teach kamailio how to handle redirect responses (3XX replies), for
example for correct accounting and to append them as new branches for later
relaying. Take a look to the module docs for more information, it contains
also a cfg example.
Cheers,
Henning
5559
days inactive
5570
days old
4 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Henning Westerholt -
Omar -
Omar Mendoza