26 Aug
2005
26 Aug
'05
11:01 p.m.
Does anybody have any tips on solving the following
I want to differenciate between offline users and unknown users. When
you use lookup("location") there is no differenciation between the two.
Does this require uri_db ?
Using 0.8.14
Br /Kevin
26 Aug
26 Aug
11:09 p.m.
On Friday 26 August 2005 22:01, Kevin Brennan wrote:
I want to differenciate between offline users and
unknown users. When
you use lookup("location") there is no differenciation between the two.
I think does_uri_exist() from the uri module should do the job.
Note: if you reply with different codes on existing and non-existing users,
your community becomes an easy target for potential spamers.
Nils
11:42 p.m.
Apart from the spammers I need to get a seperate cause code back to the
PSTN (if user is not diverted to voicemail) as retunring 504 gives
announcement "This is an invalid number". Also I only want to divert
valid numbers to voicemail.
Br /Kev.
Nils Ohlmeier wrote:
On Friday 26 August 2005 22:01, Kevin Brennan wrote:
I want to differenciate between offline users and
unknown users. When
you use lookup("location") there is no differenciation between the two.
I think does_uri_exist() from the uri module should do the job.
Note: if you reply with different codes on existing and non-existing users,
your community becomes an easy target for potential spamers.
Nils
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
11:50 p.m.
Sorry did you meant 404 gives "This is an invalid number"?
Otherwise I would be interested which vendor/ITSP convert the return code "504
Server Time-Out" (according to 3261) into such an announcement, and into what
the return code 404 gets converted.
Nils
On Friday 26 August 2005 22:42, Kevin Brennan wrote:
Apart from the spammers I need to get a seperate cause
code back to the
PSTN (if user is not diverted to voicemail) as retunring 504 gives
announcement "This is an invalid number". Also I only want to divert
valid numbers to voicemail.
Br /Kev.
Nils Ohlmeier wrote:
> On Friday 26 August 2005 22:01, Kevin Brennan wrote:
>>I want to differenciate between offline users and unknown users. When
>>you use lookup("location") there is no differenciation between the
two.
>
> I think does_uri_exist() from the uri module should do the job.
> Note: if you reply with different codes on existing and non-existing
> users, your community becomes an easy target for potential spamers.
>
> Nils
>
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
27 Aug
27 Aug
midnight
Yes typo - 404.
Nils Ohlmeier wrote:
Sorry did you meant 404 gives "This is an invalid
number"?
Otherwise I would be interested which vendor/ITSP convert the return code "504
Server Time-Out" (according to 3261) into such an announcement, and into what
the return code 404 gets converted.
Nils
On Friday 26 August 2005 22:42, Kevin Brennan wrote:
>Apart from the spammers I need to get a seperate cause code back to the
>PSTN (if user is not diverted to voicemail) as retunring 504 gives
>announcement "This is an invalid number". Also I only want to divert
>valid numbers to voicemail.
>
>Br /Kev.
>
>Nils Ohlmeier wrote:
>
>>On Friday 26 August 2005 22:01, Kevin Brennan wrote:
>>
>>>I want to differenciate between offline users and unknown users. When
>>>you use lookup("location") there is no differenciation between the
two.
>>
>>I think does_uri_exist() from the uri module should do the job.
>>Note: if you reply with different codes on existing and non-existing
>>users, your community becomes an easy target for potential spamers.
>>
>> Nils
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Serusers mailing list
>>serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
>>http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
31 Aug
31 Aug
1:48 p.m.
So I added the does_uri_exist to my offline user check and received the
following error upon startup. The problem is not obvious to me. Nils
have you
seen this error? If so any advice on how to proceed?
Aug 31 06:32:54 ser[20035]: register_udomain(): Invalid table version
(use ser_mysql.sh reinstall)
Aug 31 06:32:54 ser[20035]: domain_fixup(): Error while registering domain
Aug 31 06:32:54 ser[20035]: ERROR: fix_expr : fix_actions error
Commenting out the if-then block containing the does_uri_exist removed
this error.
Thanks,Steve
Nils Ohlmeier wrote:
On Friday 26 August 2005 22:01, Kevin Brennan wrote:
--
ISC Network Engineering
The University of Pennsylvania
3401 Walnut Street, Suite 221A
Philadelphia, PA 19104
voice: 215-573-8396
215-746-8001
fax: 215-898-9348
sip:blairs@upenn.edu
I want to differenciate between offline users and
unknown users. When
you use lookup("location") there is no differenciation between the two.
I think does_uri_exist() from the uri module should do the job.
Note: if you reply with different codes on existing and non-existing users,
your community becomes an easy target for potential spamers.
Nils
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
2:32 p.m.
It looks to me as the tables in your database, which you once created with
ser_mysql, are older then the uri module which you use. So you probably need
to "update" your database tables (like suggested with the 'ser_mysql
reinstall' command).
Nils
On Wednesday 31 August 2005 12:48, Steve Blair wrote:
So I added the does_uri_exist to my offline user check
and received the
following error upon startup. The problem is not obvious to me. Nils
have you
seen this error? If so any advice on how to proceed?
Aug 31 06:32:54 ser[20035]: register_udomain(): Invalid table version
(use ser_mysql.sh reinstall)
Aug 31 06:32:54 ser[20035]: domain_fixup(): Error while registering domain
Aug 31 06:32:54 ser[20035]: ERROR: fix_expr : fix_actions error
Commenting out the if-then block containing the does_uri_exist removed
this error.
Thanks,Steve
Nils Ohlmeier wrote:
>On Friday 26 August 2005 22:01, Kevin Brennan wrote:
>>I want to differenciate between offline users and unknown users. When
>>you use lookup("location") there is no differenciation between the
two.
>
>I think does_uri_exist() from the uri module should do the job.
>Note: if you reply with different codes on existing and non-existing
> users, your community becomes an easy target for potential spamers.
>
> Nils
>
>_______________________________________________
>Serusers mailing list
>serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
>http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
26 Aug
26 Aug
11:12 p.m.
Kevin Brennan wrote:
Does anybody have any tips on solving the following
I want to differenciate between offline users and unknown users. When
you use lookup("location") there is no differenciation between the two.
Does this require uri_db ?
Using 0.8.14
I'm about to try the following. I'd appreciate any input on this
approach that others might have.
-Steve
# Offline user
if (lookup("subscriber")) {
if (!registered("location")) {
xlog("L_INFO", "\n[SER]: OFFLINE: Subscriber is offline. Go
to voicemail. Time: [%Tf] \n");
route(6);
};
};
Br /Kevin
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
11:39 p.m.
This is interesting. I suppose you'd have to add an extra field contact
in table 'subscriber' to get a positive result - and of course the value
in contact would re-write the uri so you should do it after
lookup("location").
Will give it a try. Br /Kev./
Steve Blair wrote:
Kevin Brennan wrote:
Does anybody have any tips on solving the
following
I want to differenciate between offline users and unknown users. When
you use lookup("location") there is no differenciation between the two.
Does this require uri_db ?
Using 0.8.14
I'm about to try the following. I'd appreciate any input on this
approach that others might have.
-Steve
# Offline user
if (lookup("subscriber")) {
if (!registered("location")) {
xlog("L_INFO", "\n[SER]: OFFLINE: Subscriber is offline. Go to
voicemail. Time: [%Tf] \n");
route(6);
};
};
> Br /Kevin
>
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
27 Aug
27 Aug
1 a.m.
Kevin Brennan wrote:
This is interesting. I suppose you'd have to add
an extra field
contact in table 'subscriber' to get a positive result - and of course
the value in contact would re-write the uri so you should do it after
lookup("location").
Thanks for the note. This will save me the trouble of trying it.
Will give it a try. Br /Kev./
Steve Blair wrote:
>
>
>
> Kevin Brennan wrote:
>
>> Does anybody have any tips on solving the following
>>
>> I want to differenciate between offline users and unknown users.
>> When you use lookup("location") there is no differenciation between
>> the two.
>>
>> Does this require uri_db ?
>>
>> Using 0.8.14
>>
>
> I'm about to try the following. I'd appreciate any input on this
> approach that others might have.
>
> -Steve
>
> # Offline user
> if (lookup("subscriber")) {
> if (!registered("location")) {
> xlog("L_INFO", "\n[SER]: OFFLINE: Subscriber is offline. Go
> to voicemail. Time: [%Tf] \n");
> route(6);
> };
> };
>
>> Br /Kevin
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Serusers mailing list
>> serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
>> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>
12:19 a.m.
ser doesn't like lookup on subscribers table even with contact field
added, it must need an identical table to aliases/location.
Br /Kev
Steve Blair wrote:
Kevin Brennan wrote:
Does anybody have any tips on solving the
following
I want to differenciate between offline users and unknown users. When
you use lookup("location") there is no differenciation between the two.
Does this require uri_db ?
Using 0.8.14
I'm about to try the following. I'd appreciate any input on this
approach that others might have.
-Steve
# Offline user
if (lookup("subscriber")) {
if (!registered("location")) {
xlog("L_INFO", "\n[SER]: OFFLINE: Subscriber is offline. Go to
voicemail. Time: [%Tf] \n");
route(6);
};
};
> Br /Kevin
>
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers 
12:25 a.m.
Steve Blair wrote:
I'm about to try the following. I'd appreciate
any input on this
approach that others might have.
# Offline user
if (lookup("subscriber")) {
You can only lookup domains which have an appropriate table format like
"location" table has, because usrloc tries to preload that domains on
SER startup, and this will miserably for "subscriber" because of wrong
table version, missing columns etc.
Andy
12:34 a.m.
I suppose one solution is to create a table (say voicemail) of type
location/alias and put a url pointing to voicemail/announcment in the
contact field for any sub you want to divert.
something like
if (!lookup("location")) { #ok it's offline or unknown
# alternate routing like PSTN here.
if(lookup("voicemail")) {
route(1); #send it off to uri from contact field
break;
}
sl_send_reply("404", "Not Found");
}
/Kev/
Andreas Granig wrote:
Steve Blair wrote:
I'm about to try the following. I'd
appreciate any input on this
approach that others might have.
# Offline user
if (lookup("subscriber")) {
You can only lookup domains which have an appropriate table format like
"location" table has, because usrloc tries to preload that domains on
SER startup, and this will miserably for "subscriber" because of wrong
table version, missing columns etc.
Andy
12:44 a.m.
Kevin Brennan wrote:
I suppose one solution is to create a table (say
voicemail) of type
location/alias and put a url pointing to voicemail/announcment in the
contact field for any sub you want to divert.
That's what we use for call diversions, yes. Another possibility would
be to use avp_db_load(...) which is easier for provisioning because you
don't have to insert the contacts into all your SERs via FIFO/unixsock...
Andy
29 Aug
29 Aug
2:47 p.m.
The problem I have with does_uri_exist() is it matches the full uri, I
may have requests from the same user using different domains in the uri
ex. calls from PSTN would have user(a)pstn.gateway.com others could also
have user(a)sip.domain.com or just plain old user(a)domain.com depending on
how they were resolved. I don't want to re-write the uri domain part
because I'm also serving multiple domains. I know I could add an alias
for all these but I was looking for a simpler alternative.
Br /Kev/
Andreas Granig wrote:
I wrote:
and this will miserably for
"subscriber"
"miserably fail" of course...
And what's wrong with does_uri_exist()?
Andy
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
3:04 p.m.
Kevin Brennan wrote:
The problem I have with does_uri_exist() is it matches
the full uri, I
may have requests from the same user using different domains in the uri
ex. calls from PSTN would have user(a)pstn.gateway.com others could also
have user(a)sip.domain.com or just plain old user(a)domain.com depending on
how they were resolved. I don't want to re-write the uri domain part
because I'm also serving multiple domains. I know I could add an alias
for all these but I was looking for a simpler alternative.
But if you use domains then a lookup(...) will fail like
does_uri_exists() because it must match the user- and domain-part too.
Andy
3:56 p.m.
The server serves multiple domains but not using domains module, using
multiple alias="xxxxx". We use E.164 numbers as usernames but these can
be attached to multiple domains. br /Kev/
Andreas Granig wrote:
Kevin Brennan wrote:
The problem I have with does_uri_exist() is it
matches the full uri, I
may have requests from the same user using different domains in the uri
ex. calls from PSTN would have user(a)pstn.gateway.com others could also
have user(a)sip.domain.com or just plain old user(a)domain.com depending
on how they were resolved. I don't want to re-write the uri domain
part because I'm also serving multiple domains. I know I could add an
alias for all these but I was looking for a simpler alternative.
But if you use domains then a lookup(...) will fail like
does_uri_exists() because it must match the user- and domain-part too.
Andy 
3:13 p.m.
Kevin Brennan writes:
The problem I have with does_uri_exist() is it matches
the full uri, I
may have requests from the same user using different domains in the uri
ex. calls from PSTN would have user(a)pstn.gateway.com
i accept your point regarding calls from pstn gw provided that the user
part of the r-uri is an e.164 number, which is unique.
others could also
have user(a)sip.domain.com or just plain old user(a)domain.com depending on
how they were resolved.
sip.domain.com example i don't see valid. that can happen, but sip ua
sending the request is somehow misconfigured.
one solution might be a new radius_does_uri_user_exist() function that
would return true if the user part exists and is unique, in which case
the domain would come back in reply item.
-- juha
4:50 p.m.
Juha Heinanen wrote:
Kevin Brennan writes:
ref to http://mit.edu/sip/sip.edu/dns.shtml
A SIP UA wanting to initiate a call to sip:bigcheese@bigu.edu will first
send a DNS SRV lookup to bigu.edu. With a successful return, the SIP URI
may be re-written to sip:bigcheese@sipserver1.bigu.edu.
The problem I have with does_uri_exist() is it
matches the full uri, I
may have requests from the same user using different domains in the uri
ex. calls from PSTN would have user(a)pstn.gateway.com
i accept your point regarding calls from pstn gw provided that the user
part of the r-uri is an e.164 number, which is unique.
others could also
have user(a)sip.domain.com or just plain old user(a)domain.com depending on
how they were resolved.
sip.domain.com example i don't see valid. that can happen, but sip ua
sending the request is somehow misconfigured.
one solution might be a new
radius_does_uri_user_exist() function that
would return true if the user part exists and is unique, in which case
the domain would come back in reply item.
-- juha
4:55 p.m.
Kevin Brennan writes:
A SIP UA wanting to initiate a call to
sip:bigcheese@bigu.edu will first
send a DNS SRV lookup to bigu.edu. With a successful return, the SIP URI
may be re-written to sip:bigcheese@sipserver1.bigu.edu.
that is definitely not the right behavior. dns srv + a lookup results
destination ip address where request it sent, not domain for the request
uri.
-- juha
3:18 p.m.
kevin,
just to add to your problem, i haven't seen it because i use gws that
can add different domain parts to invites to different numbers.
perhaps you should switch to better gws.
-- juha
3:59 p.m.
We control gws but don't want to rewrite based on each e164 number as
number series is not divided into groups (per hundred etc.). /Kev/
Juha Heinanen wrote:
kevin,
just to add to your problem, i haven't seen it because i use gws that
can add different domain parts to invites to different numbers.
perhaps you should switch to better gws.
-- juha
4:48 p.m.
I think what I'll do is insert the full uri into contact on alias table
for every user then then do a lookup on this at first to rewrite the
ruri (ie. E164 -> uri translation). If the user is not in this table
then it's "unknown" the following failures to lookup location will be
offline subs so they can go to voicemail.
Thanks all for pointers /Kev/
Juha Heinanen wrote:
Kevin Brennan writes:
We control gws but don't want to rewrite
based on each e164 number as
number series is not divided into groups (per hundred etc.). /Kev/
in that case, my suggestion on a new radius_does_uri_user_exist()
function would solve your problem.
-- juha
7023
days inactive
7028
days old
26 comments
5 participants
participants (5)
-
Andreas Granig -
Juha Heinanen -
Kevin Brennan -
Nils Ohlmeier -
Steve Blair