Thanks. What about TCP?

-----Original Message----- From: serusers-bounces(a)iptel.org [mailto:serusers-bounces@lists.iptel.org]On Behalf Of Maxim Sobolev Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 12:33 PM To: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org Subject: [Serusers] nathelper updated Folks, I've updated nathelper module in trunk. The following changes were made: - Applied patch from Bogdan-Andrei IANCU <iancu(a)fokus.fraunhofer.de>de>, which allows to use nathelper without usrloc module if natpinger isn't used; - fixed natpinger for clients without explicit transport specified in the Contact header field, which means that transport is UDP; - fix_nated_contact() now ignores non-UDP contacts. Please let me know if you will see any unusual problems with the module. -Maxim _______________________________________________ Serusers mailing list serusers(a)lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers _______________________________________________ Serusers mailing list serusers(a)lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers

Now I'm confused. Can't someone register with transport=tcp? If the Contact has a private IP address (or possibly more correctly anything other than the received address), don't we want to change it to the received address and save it that way? Doesn't fix_nated_contact do that?

Dovid -----Original Message----- From: Maxim Sobolev [mailto:sobomax@portaone.com] Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 2:13 PM To: Dovid Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org Subject: Re: [Serusers] nathelper updated Dovid wrote: It will not work with TCP anyway, because TCP is connection-oriented. -Maxim used; _______________________________________________ Serusers mailing list serusers(a)lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers