please don't make the confusion between Record-Route and Route headers!
Record-Route is used to set (to define) the routing set in the initial
phase of the dialog creation - no routing is performed based RR hdr; the
Route header is used for that purpose.
bogdan
Olivier Taylor wrote:
Ok
You say anyway that routing has to be based on RURI + ROUTE
What do you think about the next line?
INVITE sip:3227321073@217.206.202.126:5060 SIP/2.0..Record-Route:
<sip:027321073@82.146.123.252;ftag=8f19be0298e5a67o0;lr=on>
I must suppose that Record-Route has to be used or in this case Route seems
wrong.
Olivier
-----Message d'origine-----
De : serusers-bounces(a)iptel.org [mailto:serusers-bounces@lists.iptel.org] De la
part de Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
Envoyé : vendredi 15 avril 2005 16:34
À : Juha Heinanen
Cc : Eric Dean; serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
Objet : Re: [Serusers] Rewrite To Heaader
putting aside the fact that modifying FROM and TO is something not so
trivial, routing calls based on TO hdr is totally wrong - according to
SIP RFC, the request routing is done based on RURI + ROUTE set; not to
mention that TO hdr contains irrelevant information which may (most of
the time) differ from the RURI.
as Juha said, try to go for a more SIP compliant provider.
bogdan
Juha Heinanen wrote:
Eric Dean writes:
>Our VoIP service provider routes calls based upon the To field
>within
>the SIP header. While SER can easily rewrite the URI, I need to
>actually prepend our account code to every outgoing call with a prefix.
>
>
does
anyone know how to prefix the To field.
it is not a good idea to modify to or from fields. i suggest you
switch to another, more sensible service provider.
-- juha
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers