[Serusers] textops module - are the inserted hfs visible after insertion in the same route block?
Hi,
I have the following problem after I insert a partical hf value woth the usage of the textops module (insert_attr_hf) the is_present_hf function returns negative result. is this correct behaviour??
Regards Tomasz
On 11/08/2007 01:57 PM, Tomasz Zieleniewski wrote:
Hi,
I have the following problem after I insert a partical hf value woth the usage of the textops module (insert_attr_hf) the is_present_hf function returns negative result. is this correct behaviour??
yes, this is the expected result, because insert_attr_hf does not immediately insert the HF, it just asks SER core to insert the HF when the message is going to be forwarded (it inserts a new lump). Thus, is_present_hf does not see the change, because it works with the original message. This behaviour is usually true for all the message manipulation functions except for those which modify the RURI.
Regards, Miklos
Regards Tomasz _______________________________________________ Serusers mailing list Serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
They are not visible (except from the onsend_route) ... they are kept as "insivisble" diffs.
-jiri
At 13:57 08/11/2007, Tomasz Zieleniewski wrote:
Hi,
I have the following problem after I insert a partical hf value woth the usage of the textops module (insert_attr_hf) the is_present_hf function returns negative result. is this correct behaviour??
Regards Tomasz _______________________________________________ Serusers mailing list Serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
-- Jiri Kuthan http://iptel.org/~jiri/
-
Jiri Kuthan -
Miklos Tirpak -
Tomasz Zieleniewski