[OpenSER-Users] Problem in REGISTER with "Route" (I don't want to use "alias" in conf file)
12 Sep
2007
12 Sep
'07
12:18 p.m.
Hi, I've multidomain OpenSer and I want the possibility of adding new domains
without having to write in conf file and restart OpenSer, so I use "domain"
module and functions. It works fine.
The problem is that WengoPhone includes a "Route" in the REGISTER so it is
matches in "loose_route" and creates an infinite loop:
-------------------------------------------
U 2007/09/12 11:00:47.770226 212.121.235.18:1029 -> 88.95.0.210:5060
REGISTER sip:sip.domain.net SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.58:5061;rport;branch=123456789
Route: <sip:sip.domain.net;lr>
U 2007/09/12 11:00:47.772884 88.95.0.210:5060 -> 88.95.0.210:5060
REGISTER sip:sip.domain.net SIP/2.0
Max-Forwards: 10
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 88.95.0.210;branch=z9hG4bK734e.08122386.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
192.168.1.58:5061;received=212.121.235.18;rport=1029;branch=123456789
Route: <sip:sip.domain.net;lr>
U 2007/09/12 11:00:47.775153 88.95.0.210:5060 -> 88.95.0.210:5060
REGISTER sip:sip.domain.net SIP/2.0
Max-Forwards: 9
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 88.95.0.210;branch=z9hG4bK734e.18122386.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 88.95.0.210;rport=5060;branch=z9hG4bK734e.08122386.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
192.168.1.58:5061;received=212.121.235.18;rport=1029;branch=123456789
Route: <sip:sip.domain.net;lr>
etc etc...
-------------------------------------------
A developer of WengoPhone said me that this "Route" header is not necessary
but still valid, and that I can solve it by adding:
alias=sip.domain.org
But I don't want to write in conf file for each new added domain, and I don't
want to restart OpenSer when it.
I'm thinking in change:
if (loose_route()) {
by
if (loose_route() && method!="REGISTER") {
but it doesn't seem very ellegatn solution.
How could I solve it? Thanks for any help.
--
Iñaki Baz Castillo
ibc(a)in.ilimit.es
12 Sep
12 Sep
12:49 p.m.
El Wednesday 12 September 2007 11:18:22 Iñaki Baz Castillo escribió:
alias=sip.domain.org
But I don't want to write in conf file for each new added domain, and I
don't want to restart OpenSer when it.
Humm, I could add each domain to /etc/resolv.conf so it works, but it is just
valid for DNS A type... what about DNS SRV SIP?
--
Iñaki Baz Castillo
ibc(a)in.ilimit.es
13 Sep
13 Sep
4:22 p.m.
New subject: [OpenSER-Users] Problem in REGISTER with "Route" (I don't want to use "alias" in conf file)
Hi!
This is a known limitation with openser - loose_route does not import
the domains from domain module.
Maybe we already have it on the feature request list - but if not,
please submit it on the feature request tracker
regards
klaus
Iñaki Baz Castillo schrieb:
Hi, I've multidomain OpenSer and I want the
possibility of adding new domains
without having to write in conf file and restart OpenSer, so I use "domain"
module and functions. It works fine.
The problem is that WengoPhone includes a "Route" in the REGISTER so it is
matches in "loose_route" and creates an infinite loop:
-------------------------------------------
U 2007/09/12 11:00:47.770226 212.121.235.18:1029 -> 88.95.0.210:5060
REGISTER sip:sip.domain.net SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.58:5061;rport;branch=123456789
Route: <sip:sip.domain.net;lr>
U 2007/09/12 11:00:47.772884 88.95.0.210:5060 -> 88.95.0.210:5060
REGISTER sip:sip.domain.net SIP/2.0
Max-Forwards: 10
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 88.95.0.210;branch=z9hG4bK734e.08122386.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
192.168.1.58:5061;received=212.121.235.18;rport=1029;branch=123456789
Route: <sip:sip.domain.net;lr>
U 2007/09/12 11:00:47.775153 88.95.0.210:5060 -> 88.95.0.210:5060
REGISTER sip:sip.domain.net SIP/2.0
Max-Forwards: 9
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 88.95.0.210;branch=z9hG4bK734e.18122386.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 88.95.0.210;rport=5060;branch=z9hG4bK734e.08122386.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
192.168.1.58:5061;received=212.121.235.18;rport=1029;branch=123456789
Route: <sip:sip.domain.net;lr>
etc etc...
-------------------------------------------
A developer of WengoPhone said me that this "Route" header is not necessary
but still valid, and that I can solve it by adding:
alias=sip.domain.org
But I don't want to write in conf file for each new added domain, and I don't
want to restart OpenSer when it.
I'm thinking in change:
if (loose_route()) {
by
if (loose_route() && method!="REGISTER") {
but it doesn't seem very ellegatn solution.
How could I solve it? Thanks for any help.
4:33 p.m.
New subject: [OpenSER-Users] Problem in REGISTER with "Route" (I don't want to use "alias" in conf file)
El Thursday 13 September 2007 15:22:18 Klaus Darilion escribió:
This is a known limitation with openser - loose_route
does not import
the domains from domain module.
Yes, ok.
I've found a work around that is adding the domains in "/etc/hosts", but
that
just valid for DNS A registry, what about a SRV registry?
Maybe we already have it on the feature request list -
but if not,
please submit it on the feature request tracker
Ok, I'll do.
Thanks.
--
Iñaki Baz Castillo
ibc(a)in.ilimit.es
4:41 p.m.
New subject: [OpenSER-Users] Problem in REGISTER with "Route" (I don't want to use "alias" in conf file)
Iñaki Baz Castillo writes:
I've found a work around that is adding the
domains in "/etc/hosts",
but that just valid for DNS A registry, what about a SRV registry?
if your proxy has hostname myproxy.foo.bar and it is serving domain
company.com, then srv entry for that domain looks like
_sip._udp.company.com. IN SRV 0 0 5060 myproxy.foo.bar.
if wengo phone then puts company.com in route header instead of
myproxy.foo.bar, you should report a bug or switch to a better sip ua.
-- juha
4:59 p.m.
New subject: [OpenSER-Users] Problem in REGISTER with "Route" (I don't want to use "alias" in conf file)
El Thursday 13 September 2007 15:41:07 Juha Heinanen escribió:
Iñaki Baz Castillo writes:
I haven't tryed it again, I will do ;)
--
Iñaki Baz Castillo
ibc(a)in.ilimit.es
I've found a work around that is adding the
domains in "/etc/hosts",
but that just valid for DNS A registry, what about a SRV registry?
if your proxy has hostname myproxy.foo.bar and it is serving domain
company.com, then srv entry for that domain looks like
_sip._udp.company.com. IN SRV 0 0 5060 myproxy.foo.bar.
if wengo phone then puts company.com in route header instead of
myproxy.foo.bar, you should report a bug or switch to a better sip ua.
4:37 p.m.
New subject: [OpenSER-Users] Problem in REGISTER with "Route" (I don't want to use "alias" in conf file)
Klaus Darilion writes:
> A developer of WengoPhone said me that this
"Route" header is not
> necessary but still valid, and that I can solve it by adding:
>
> alias=sip.domain.org
>
> But I don't want to write in conf file for each new added domain,
> and I don't want to restart OpenSer when it.
i thought that route header includes list of proxies that the request
should visit, not domains the request should visit:
20.34 Route
The Route header field is used to force routing for a request through
the listed set of proxies. Examples of the use of the Route header field
are in Section 16.12.1.
Example:
Route: <sip:bigbox3.site3.atlanta.com;lr>,<sip:server10.biloxi.com;lr>
so there should be no need to add aliases for each domain your proxy is
serving (unless you want your proxy to have a separate hostname for each
of its domains).
-- juha
5:01 p.m.
New subject: [OpenSER-Users] Problem in REGISTER with "Route" (I don't want to use "alias" in conf file)
El Thursday 13 September 2007 15:37:39 Juha Heinanen escribió:
i thought that route header includes list of proxies
that the request
should visit, not domains the request should visit:
20.34 Route
The Route header field is used to force routing for a request through
the listed set of proxies. Examples of the use of the Route header field
are in Section 16.12.1.
Example:
Route: <sip:bigbox3.site3.atlanta.com;lr>,<sip:server10.biloxi.com;lr>
so there should be no need to add aliases for each domain your proxy is
serving (unless you want your proxy to have a separate hostname for each
of its domains).
Yes, but note what Klaus Darilion said:
"This is a known limitation with openser - loose_route does not import
the domains from domain module."
The problem is just in "loose_route()" function. So I've open a bug/wish for
that:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1793928&g…
Regards.
--
Iñaki Baz Castillo
ibc(a)in.ilimit.es
5:33 p.m.
New subject: [OpenSER-Users] Problem in REGISTER with "Route" (I don't want to use "alias" in conf file)
Iñaki Baz Castillo writes:
Yes, but note what Klaus Darilion said:
"This is a known limitation with openser - loose_route does not import
the domains from domain module."
and it should not do so. see my reply to you. your feature request is
not valid no matter what klaus said.
-- juha
5:46 p.m.
New subject: [OpenSER-Users] Problem in REGISTER with "Route" (I don't want to use "alias" in conf file)
El Thursday 13 September 2007 16:33:40 Juha Heinanen escribió:
Iñaki Baz Castillo writes:
You said:
"i thought that route header includes list of proxies that the request
should visit, not domains the request should visit"
But what I mean is that if my OpenSer is has as local domains (in "domain"
table):
domain1.org
domain2.org
A DNS type A or SRV of those domain should give us the IP of OpenSer, so
finally the proxy = the domain.
So if WengoPhones includes a "Route: domain1.org" in REGISTER then it'll do
a
DNS query (SRV or A) for "domain1.org" and it will get OpenSer IP.
So, what is the difference?
Thanks for your replies.
--
ilimit...
*Iñaki Baz Castillo*
ibc(a)in.ilimit.es
ÀREA SISTEMES
0034 937 333 375
VOLTA 1, PIS 5
08224 TERRASSA.BCN
Aquest enviament és confidencial i està destinat únicament a la persona a qui
s'ha enviat.
Pot contenir informació privada sotmesa al secret professional, la distribució
de la qual està prohibida per la legislació vigent.
Yes, but note what Klaus Darilion said:
"This is a known limitation with openser - loose_route does not import
the domains from domain module."
and it should not do so. see my reply to you. your feature request is
not valid no matter what klaus said.
5:48 p.m.
New subject: [OpenSER-Users] Problem in REGISTER with "Route" (I don't want to use "alias" in conf file)
El Thursday 13 September 2007 16:46:35 Iñaki Baz Castillo escribió:
You said:
"i thought that route header includes list of proxies that the request
should visit, not domains the request should visit"
But what I mean is that if my OpenSer is has as local domains (in "domain"
table):
domain1.org
domain2.org
A DNS type A or SRV of those domain should give us the IP of OpenSer, so
finally the proxy = the domain.
So if WengoPhones includes a "Route: domain1.org" in REGISTER then it'll
do
a DNS query (SRV or A) for "domain1.org" and it will get OpenSer IP.
So, what is the difference?
Ops, I didn't see your reply in Sourceforge:
"this request is invalid. route header contains hostnames or host
addresses, not domains."
That convinces me ;)
--
Iñaki Baz Castillo
ibc(a)in.ilimit.es
5:54 p.m.
New subject: [OpenSER-Users] Problem in REGISTER with "Route" (I don't want to use "alias" in conf file)
Juha Heinanen schrieb:
Iñaki Baz Castillo writes:
Are you sure? I think
INVITE sip:klaus@iptel.org SIP/2.0
Route: <sip:iptel.org;lr>
is a valid request. (btw: osip puts the outboundproxy into Route headers)
regards
klaus
Yes, but note what Klaus Darilion said:
"This is a known limitation with openser - loose_route does not import
the domains from domain module."
and it should not do so. see my reply to you. your feature request is
not valid no matter what klaus said.
6:17 p.m.
New subject: [OpenSER-Users] Problem in REGISTER with "Route" (I don't want to use "alias" in conf file)
Klaus Darilion writes:
Are you sure? I think
INVITE sip:klaus@iptel.org SIP/2.0
Route: <sip:iptel.org;lr>
that kind of route header uri does not provide any added value to request
uri.
-- juha
6:24 p.m.
New subject: [OpenSER-Users] Problem in REGISTER with "Route" (I don't want to use "alias" in conf file)
El Thursday 13 September 2007 17:17:54 Juha Heinanen escribió:
Klaus Darilion writes:
Completely useless. I reported the wish in Wengophone (that uses oSip) and a
developer told me that it's possible to take it off for future versiones
since it isn't useful at all.
--
Iñaki Baz Castillo
ibc(a)in.ilimit.es
Are you sure? I think
INVITE sip:klaus@iptel.org SIP/2.0
Route: <sip:iptel.org;lr>
that kind of route header uri does not provide any added value to request
uri.
14 Sep
14 Sep
2:17 p.m.
New subject: [OpenSER-Users] Problem in REGISTER with "Route" (I don't want to use "alias" in conf file)
Juha Heinanen schrieb:
Klaus Darilion writes:
You are correct but IMO it is still legal.
Are you sure? I think
INVITE sip:klaus@iptel.org SIP/2.0
Route: <sip:iptel.org;lr>
that kind of route header uri does not provide any added value to request
uri.
2 Oct
2 Oct
7:30 p.m.
New subject: [OpenSER-Users] Problem in REGISTER with "Route" (I don't want to use "alias" in conf file)
El Friday 14 September 2007 13:17:09 Klaus Darilion escribió:
Juha Heinanen schrieb:
I think "Route" header should be canonical hostname and not the SIP domain:
In "SIP Forum"'s SIPconnect program to get SIP compliant devices and
services
we can read:
"SIP Proxy Servers MUST use canonical hostnames in any 'Via:' and/or
'Route:'
SIP header field that it inserts in the SIP message.":
http://www.zoomerang.com/web/SharedResults/SharedResultsSurveyResultsPage.a…
(step 15)
So if that is true then OpenSer behaviour is correct and there is a bug in
oSIP stack because it shouldn't add a "Route" header with SIP domain value
in
REGISTER messages. Could anyone confirm this in order to report the bug to
oSIP developers?
--
ilimit...
*Iñaki Baz Castillo*
ibc(a)in.ilimit.es
ÀREA SISTEMES
0034 937 333 375
VOLTA 1, PIS 5
08224 TERRASSA.BCN
Aquest enviament és confidencial i està destinat únicament a la persona a qui
s'ha enviat.
Pot contenir informació privada sotmesa al secret professional, la distribució
de la qual està prohibida per la legislació vigent.
Klaus Darilion writes:
You are correct but IMO it is still legal. Are you sure? I think
INVITE sip:klaus@iptel.org SIP/2.0
Route: <sip:iptel.org;lr>
that kind of route header uri does not provide any added value to request
uri. 
13 Sep
13 Sep
5:41 p.m.
New subject: [OpenSER-Users] Problem in REGISTER with "Route" (I don't want to use "alias" in conf file)
Hi,
Klaus Darilion wrote:
This is a known limitation with openser - loose_route
does not import
the domains from domain module.
Maybe we already have it on the feature request list - but if not,
please submit it on the feature request tracker
Daniel once suggested a workaround for this issue:
if(loose_route())
{
if($du != null && is_domain_local("$dd"))
{
$du = null;
}
else
{
# do loose-routing here
}
}
Works fine here.
Andreas
5:55 p.m.
New subject: [OpenSER-Users] Problem in REGISTER with "Route" (I don't want to use "alias" in conf file)
El Thursday 13 September 2007 16:41:36 Andreas Granig escribió:
Hi,
Klaus Darilion wrote:
Could you explain what $du and $dd are for?
I'am logging them and they are always "null" ¿?
Thanks.
--
ilimit...
*Iñaki Baz Castillo*
ibc(a)in.ilimit.es
ÀREA SISTEMES
0034 937 333 375
VOLTA 1, PIS 5
08224 TERRASSA.BCN
Aquest enviament és confidencial i està destinat únicament a la persona a qui
s'ha enviat.
Pot contenir informació privada sotmesa al secret professional, la distribució
de la qual està prohibida per la legislació vigent.
This is a known limitation with openser -
loose_route does not import
the domains from domain module.
Maybe we already have it on the feature request list - but if not,
please submit it on the feature request tracker
Daniel once suggested a workaround for this issue:
if(loose_route())
{
if($du != null && is_domain_local("$dd"))
{
$du = null;
}
else
{
# do loose-routing here
}
}
Works fine here. 
6:19 p.m.
New subject: [OpenSER-Users] Problem in REGISTER with "Route" (I don't want to use "alias" in conf file)
On Thursday 13 September 2007, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
El Thursday 13 September 2007 16:41:36 Andreas Granig
escribió:
You find information about this pseudovariables in the wiki:
http://openser.org/dokuwiki/doku.php/pseudovariables:1.2.x#domain_of_destin…
Cheers,
Henning
Hi,
Klaus Darilion wrote:
Could you explain what $du and $dd are for?
I'am logging them and they are always "null" ¿? This is a known limitation with openser -
loose_route does not import
the domains from domain module.
Maybe we already have it on the feature request list - but if not,
please submit it on the feature request tracker
Daniel once suggested a workaround for this issue:
if(loose_route())
{
if($du != null && is_domain_local("$dd"))
{
$du = null;
}
else
{
# do loose-routing here
}
}
Works fine here.
6:40 p.m.
New subject: [OpenSER-Users] Problem in REGISTER with "Route" (I don't want to use "alias" in conf file)
El Thursday 13 September 2007 17:19:26 Henning Westerholt escribió:
Yes, sure I looked for them before asking in the list.
The point is that I don't understand what they are for.
$du - reference to destination uri
$ru - reference to request's URI
What does "reference to destination uri" mean? what is "destination
uri"? it
shows me "null" in any case.
--
ilimit...
*Iñaki Baz Castillo*
ibc(a)in.ilimit.es
ÀREA SISTEMES
0034 937 333 375
VOLTA 1, PIS 5
08224 TERRASSA.BCN
Aquest enviament és confidencial i està destinat únicament a la persona a qui
s'ha enviat.
Pot contenir informació privada sotmesa al secret professional, la distribució
de la qual està prohibida per la legislació vigent.
Could you
explain what $du and $dd are for?
I'am logging them and they are always "null" ¿?
You find information about this pseudovariables in the wiki:
http://openser.org/dokuwiki/doku.php/pseudovariables:1.2.x#domain_of_destin
ation_uri
6:21 p.m.
New subject: [OpenSER-Users] Problem in REGISTER with "Route" (I don't want to use "alias" in conf file)
If loose_route() returns true, a destination uri ($du) is set according
to the first Route header. $dd refers to the domain part of this uri.
So if there's a destination uri resulting from a Route header, you can
check its domain using is_domain_local() and thereby distinguish whether
the domain is served by your proxy.
Andreas
Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
El Thursday 13 September 2007 16:41:36 Andreas Granig
escribió:
Hi,
Klaus Darilion wrote:
Could you explain what $du and $dd are for?
I'am logging them and they are always "null" ¿?
Thanks.
This is a known limitation with openser -
loose_route does not import
the domains from domain module.
Maybe we already have it on the feature request list - but if not,
please submit it on the feature request tracker
Daniel once suggested a workaround
for this issue:
if(loose_route())
{
if($du != null && is_domain_local("$dd"))
{
$du = null;
}
else
{
# do loose-routing here
}
}
Works fine here.
6:42 p.m.
New subject: [OpenSER-Users] Problem in REGISTER with "Route" (I don't want to use "alias" in conf file)
El Thursday 13 September 2007 17:21:13 Andreas Granig escribió:
If loose_route() returns true, a destination uri ($du)
is set according
to the first Route header. $dd refers to the domain part of this uri.
Ok, understood now.
If nobody matter I will add this explanation in the wiki.
--
Iñaki Baz Castillo
ibc(a)in.ilimit.es
6:56 p.m.
New subject: [OpenSER-Users] Problem in REGISTER with "Route" (I don't want to use "alias" in conf file)
El Thursday 13 September 2007 17:21:13 Andreas Granig escribió:
If loose_route() returns true, a destination uri ($du)
is set according
to the first Route header. $dd refers to the domain part of this uri.
I understand but can't get it working:
if (loose_route()) {
xlog("L_INFO", "loose_route()\n");
xlog("L_INFO", "Route = $hdr(Route)\n");
xlog("L_INFO", "du = $du -- dd = $dd -- ds = $ds\n");
But in the ACK or re-INVITE I just see:
loose_route()
Route = <sip:86.92.0.210;lr=on;ftag=zxmjg;dialog-id=326.db350534>
du = <null> -- dd = <null> -- ds = <null>
Why these 3 variables ($du, $dd, $ds) are <null> ?
So if there's a destination uri resulting from a
Route header, you can
check its domain using is_domain_local() and thereby distinguish whether
the domain is served by your proxy.
Yes, the idea is good.
--
ilimit...
*Iñaki Baz Castillo*
ibc(a)in.ilimit.es
ÀREA SISTEMES
0034 937 333 375
VOLTA 1, PIS 5
08224 TERRASSA.BCN
Aquest enviament és confidencial i està destinat únicament a la persona a qui
s'ha enviat.
Pot contenir informació privada sotmesa al secret professional, la distribució
de la qual està prohibida per la legislació vigent.
6264
days inactive
6284
days old
22 comments
5 participants
participants (5)
-
Andreas Granig -
Henning Westerholt -
Iñaki Baz Castillo -
jh＠tutpro.com -
Klaus Darilion