Hi,
before forwarding a call (INVITE) from the PSTN with flag "privacy=full" in the Remote-Party-ID hf to a none-voice-licensed carrier I need to make sure that the calling party number is completely wiped out from the SIP requests.
I see this number at three places: the Remote-Party-ID hf itself, the
From hf and the Contact hf.
The Remote-Party-ID hf can simply be dropped or replaced by something anonymous.
The From hf can be rewritten using uac_replace_from.
But what about the Contact hf? This field is, as far as I can see, required for routing purposes, to tell the called party side where to send replies. So, if I would manage it to rewrite the field, I would have to make sure, the replies sent to the rewritten address once again will be rewritten to target for the meant destination.
Is there a best practice for this item?
Thanks, Wolfgang
If you need full privacy, then it is better to use a B2BUA like Asterisk.
regards klaus
Wolfgang Hottgenroth wrote:
Hi,
before forwarding a call (INVITE) from the PSTN with flag "privacy=full" in the Remote-Party-ID hf to a none-voice-licensed carrier I need to make sure that the calling party number is completely wiped out from the SIP requests.
I see this number at three places: the Remote-Party-ID hf itself, the
From hf and the Contact hf.
The Remote-Party-ID hf can simply be dropped or replaced by something anonymous.
The From hf can be rewritten using uac_replace_from.
But what about the Contact hf? This field is, as far as I can see, required for routing purposes, to tell the called party side where to send replies. So, if I would manage it to rewrite the field, I would have to make sure, the replies sent to the rewritten address once again will be rewritten to target for the meant destination.
Is there a best practice for this item?
Thanks, Wolfgang
Users mailing list Users@openser.org http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
Really sure that there is no way only using openser? I don't want to deploy that fat beast additionally just for a single feature.
Or is there something I haven't considered yet?
Thanks, Wolfgang
Klaus Darilion wrote:
If you need full privacy, then it is better to use a B2BUA like Asterisk.
regards klaus
Wolfgang Hottgenroth wrote:
Hi,
before forwarding a call (INVITE) from the PSTN with flag "privacy=full" in the Remote-Party-ID hf to a none-voice-licensed carrier I need to make sure that the calling party number is completely wiped out from the SIP requests.
I see this number at three places: the Remote-Party-ID hf itself, the
From hf and the Contact hf.
The Remote-Party-ID hf can simply be dropped or replaced by something anonymous.
The From hf can be rewritten using uac_replace_from.
But what about the Contact hf? This field is, as far as I can see, required for routing purposes, to tell the called party side where to send replies. So, if I would manage it to rewrite the field, I would have to make sure, the replies sent to the rewritten address once again will be rewritten to target for the meant destination.
Is there a best practice for this item?
Thanks, Wolfgang
Users mailing list Users@openser.org http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
Hi Wolfgang,
if the destination is a GW and you set a RPID hdr, you do not need to remove the contact and FROM - the GW will silently ignore them.
regards, Bogdan
Wolfgang Hottgenroth wrote:
Really sure that there is no way only using openser? I don't want to deploy that fat beast additionally just for a single feature.
Or is there something I haven't considered yet?
Thanks, Wolfgang
Klaus Darilion wrote:
If you need full privacy, then it is better to use a B2BUA like Asterisk.
regards klaus
Wolfgang Hottgenroth wrote:
Hi,
before forwarding a call (INVITE) from the PSTN with flag "privacy=full" in the Remote-Party-ID hf to a none-voice-licensed carrier I need to make sure that the calling party number is completely wiped out from the SIP requests.
I see this number at three places: the Remote-Party-ID hf itself, the
From hf and the Contact hf.
The Remote-Party-ID hf can simply be dropped or replaced by something anonymous.
The From hf can be rewritten using uac_replace_from.
But what about the Contact hf? This field is, as far as I can see, required for routing purposes, to tell the called party side where to send replies. So, if I would manage it to rewrite the field, I would have to make sure, the replies sent to the rewritten address once again will be rewritten to target for the meant destination.
Is there a best practice for this item?
Thanks, Wolfgang
Users mailing list Users@openser.org http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
Users mailing list Users@openser.org http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
Hi,
you're right, but here the source is the GW and the destination is another SIP proxy with SIP phones behind it. And since we are terminating calls out of the PSTN to this other SIP proxy, ran by a company without voice-license, I need to remove any hint to the identity of the caller before handing over the call to that second SIP proxy.
Wolfgang
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote:
Hi Wolfgang,
if the destination is a GW and you set a RPID hdr, you do not need to remove the contact and FROM - the GW will silently ignore them.
regards, Bogdan
Wolfgang Hottgenroth wrote:
Really sure that there is no way only using openser? I don't want to deploy that fat beast additionally just for a single feature.
Or is there something I haven't considered yet?
Thanks, Wolfgang
Klaus Darilion wrote:
If you need full privacy, then it is better to use a B2BUA like Asterisk.
regards klaus
Wolfgang Hottgenroth wrote:
Hi,
before forwarding a call (INVITE) from the PSTN with flag "privacy=full" in the Remote-Party-ID hf to a none-voice-licensed carrier I need to make sure that the calling party number is completely wiped out from the SIP requests.
I see this number at three places: the Remote-Party-ID hf itself, the
From hf and the Contact hf.
The Remote-Party-ID hf can simply be dropped or replaced by something anonymous.
The From hf can be rewritten using uac_replace_from.
But what about the Contact hf? This field is, as far as I can see, required for routing purposes, to tell the called party side where to send replies. So, if I would manage it to rewrite the field, I would have to make sure, the replies sent to the rewritten address once again will be rewritten to target for the meant destination.
Is there a best practice for this item?
Thanks, Wolfgang
Users mailing list Users@openser.org http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
Users mailing list Users@openser.org http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
Hi,
I see what you are trying to do. I have some idea about masking the contact hdr, but you still have to deal with VIA :D.....
about Contact...since the contact provided by the GW is the same (let's assume that), before forwarding to the foreign proxy, you may replace the GW contact with a contact pointing to your server and containing a token easy to recognize (maybe a username?). On the way back, if you find the funny contact you inserted (which will be RURI or Route), you have to restore it to the GW contact....
never tried this, but it might work....
regards, bogdan
Wolfgang Hottgenroth wrote:
Hi,
you're right, but here the source is the GW and the destination is another SIP proxy with SIP phones behind it. And since we are terminating calls out of the PSTN to this other SIP proxy, ran by a company without voice-license, I need to remove any hint to the identity of the caller before handing over the call to that second SIP proxy.
Wolfgang
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote:
Hi Wolfgang,
if the destination is a GW and you set a RPID hdr, you do not need to remove the contact and FROM - the GW will silently ignore them.
regards, Bogdan
Wolfgang Hottgenroth wrote:
Really sure that there is no way only using openser? I don't want to deploy that fat beast additionally just for a single feature.
Or is there something I haven't considered yet?
Thanks, Wolfgang
Klaus Darilion wrote:
If you need full privacy, then it is better to use a B2BUA like Asterisk.
regards klaus
Wolfgang Hottgenroth wrote:
Hi,
before forwarding a call (INVITE) from the PSTN with flag "privacy=full" in the Remote-Party-ID hf to a none-voice-licensed carrier I need to make sure that the calling party number is completely wiped out from the SIP requests.
I see this number at three places: the Remote-Party-ID hf itself, the
From hf and the Contact hf.
The Remote-Party-ID hf can simply be dropped or replaced by something anonymous.
The From hf can be rewritten using uac_replace_from.
But what about the Contact hf? This field is, as far as I can see, required for routing purposes, to tell the called party side where to send replies. So, if I would manage it to rewrite the field, I would have to make sure, the replies sent to the rewritten address once again will be rewritten to target for the meant destination.
Is there a best practice for this item?
Thanks, Wolfgang
Users mailing list Users@openser.org http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
Users mailing list Users@openser.org http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
Yep, you indeed understand exactly what I'm about to try, replacing the contact by something recognizable ... I was wondering whether someelse was face the same problem.
Thanks, Wolfgang
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote:
Hi,
I see what you are trying to do. I have some idea about masking the contact hdr, but you still have to deal with VIA :D.....
about Contact...since the contact provided by the GW is the same (let's assume that), before forwarding to the foreign proxy, you may replace the GW contact with a contact pointing to your server and containing a token easy to recognize (maybe a username?). On the way back, if you find the funny contact you inserted (which will be RURI or Route), you have to restore it to the GW contact....
never tried this, but it might work....
regards, bogdan
Wolfgang Hottgenroth wrote:
Hi,
you're right, but here the source is the GW and the destination is another SIP proxy with SIP phones behind it. And since we are terminating calls out of the PSTN to this other SIP proxy, ran by a company without voice-license, I need to remove any hint to the identity of the caller before handing over the call to that second SIP proxy.
Wolfgang
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote:
Hi Wolfgang,
if the destination is a GW and you set a RPID hdr, you do not need to remove the contact and FROM - the GW will silently ignore them.
regards, Bogdan
Wolfgang Hottgenroth wrote:
Really sure that there is no way only using openser? I don't want to deploy that fat beast additionally just for a single feature.
Or is there something I haven't considered yet?
Thanks, Wolfgang
Klaus Darilion wrote:
If you need full privacy, then it is better to use a B2BUA like Asterisk.
regards klaus
Wolfgang Hottgenroth wrote:
Hi,
before forwarding a call (INVITE) from the PSTN with flag "privacy=full" in the Remote-Party-ID hf to a none-voice-licensed carrier I need to make sure that the calling party number is completely wiped out from the SIP requests.
I see this number at three places: the Remote-Party-ID hf itself, the
> From hf and the Contact hf. >
The Remote-Party-ID hf can simply be dropped or replaced by something anonymous.
The From hf can be rewritten using uac_replace_from.
But what about the Contact hf? This field is, as far as I can see, required for routing purposes, to tell the called party side where to send replies. So, if I would manage it to rewrite the field, I would have to make sure, the replies sent to the rewritten address once again will be rewritten to target for the meant destination.
Is there a best practice for this item?
Thanks, Wolfgang
Users mailing list Users@openser.org http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
Users mailing list Users@openser.org http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
Wolfgang,
usually there are two ways to go when you want to protect a GW: 1) make it invisible (want you are trying to do) 2) make it inaccessible = set it a private network, accessible only via the proxy; from outside, only private, unroutable/useless IPs will be visible ;)
basically the major factor is if you control the GW or not...
regards, bogdan
Wolfgang Hottgenroth wrote:
Yep, you indeed understand exactly what I'm about to try, replacing the contact by something recognizable ... I was wondering whether someelse was face the same problem.
Thanks, Wolfgang
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote:
Hi,
I see what you are trying to do. I have some idea about masking the contact hdr, but you still have to deal with VIA :D.....
about Contact...since the contact provided by the GW is the same (let's assume that), before forwarding to the foreign proxy, you may replace the GW contact with a contact pointing to your server and containing a token easy to recognize (maybe a username?). On the way back, if you find the funny contact you inserted (which will be RURI or Route), you have to restore it to the GW contact....
never tried this, but it might work....
regards, bogdan
Wolfgang Hottgenroth wrote:
Hi,
you're right, but here the source is the GW and the destination is another SIP proxy with SIP phones behind it. And since we are terminating calls out of the PSTN to this other SIP proxy, ran by a company without voice-license, I need to remove any hint to the identity of the caller before handing over the call to that second SIP proxy.
Wolfgang
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote:
Hi Wolfgang,
if the destination is a GW and you set a RPID hdr, you do not need to remove the contact and FROM - the GW will silently ignore them.
regards, Bogdan
Wolfgang Hottgenroth wrote:
Really sure that there is no way only using openser? I don't want to deploy that fat beast additionally just for a single feature.
Or is there something I haven't considered yet?
Thanks, Wolfgang
Klaus Darilion wrote:
If you need full privacy, then it is better to use a B2BUA like Asterisk.
regards klaus
Wolfgang Hottgenroth wrote:
>Hi, > > >before forwarding a call (INVITE) from the PSTN with flag >"privacy=full" >in the Remote-Party-ID hf to a none-voice-licensed carrier I need to >make sure that the calling party number is completely wiped out from >the >SIP requests. > >I see this number at three places: the Remote-Party-ID hf itself, the > > > > > > >>From hf and the Contact hf. >> >> >> >The Remote-Party-ID hf can simply be dropped or replaced by something >anonymous. > >The From hf can be rewritten using uac_replace_from. > >But what about the Contact hf? This field is, as far as I can see, >required for routing purposes, to tell the called party side where to >send replies. So, if I would manage it to rewrite the field, I would >have to make sure, the replies sent to the rewritten address once >again >will be rewritten to target for the meant destination. > >Is there a best practice for this item? > > > >Thanks, >Wolfgang > >_______________________________________________ >Users mailing list >Users@openser.org >http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users > > > > >
Users mailing list Users@openser.org http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
-
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu -
Klaus Darilion -
Wolfgang Hottgenroth