19 Jun
2008
19 Jun
'08
5:51 p.m.
Hi, I'm experimenting problems with my carrier gateway since sometimes it
doesn't reply "100 Trying" in several seconds.
I set "fr_timer" to 12 seconds so after this time the transaction is closed.
In case the response ("100 Trying") arrives more than "fr_timer"
seconds to
OpenSer, does OpenSer forward it upstream as RFC3261 indicates? or does
Openser drop it?
Thanks.
--
Iñaki Baz Castillo
ibc(a)in.ilimit.es
19 Jun
19 Jun
6:08 p.m.
El Thursday 19 June 2008 16:51:57 Iñaki Baz Castillo escribió:
Hi, I'm experimenting problems with my carrier
gateway since sometimes it
doesn't reply "100 Trying" in several seconds.
I set "fr_timer" to 12 seconds so after this time the transaction is
closed.
In case the response ("100 Trying") arrives more than "fr_timer"
seconds to
OpenSer, does OpenSer forward it upstream as RFC3261 indicates? or does
Openser drop it?
Ok, it drops it, confirmed.
--
Iñaki Baz Castillo
ibc(a)in.ilimit.es
6:30 p.m.
New subject: [OpenSER-Users] Does OpenSer allow a response after "fr_timer" going upstream?
Iñaki Baz Castillo schrieb:
El Thursday 19 June 2008 16:51:57 Iñaki Baz Castillo
escribió:
AFAIK "100 trying" must not be relayed.
regards
klaus
Hi, I'm experimenting problems with my
carrier gateway since sometimes it
doesn't reply "100 Trying" in several seconds.
I set "fr_timer" to 12 seconds so after this time the transaction is
closed.
In case the response ("100 Trying") arrives more than "fr_timer"
seconds to
OpenSer, does OpenSer forward it upstream as RFC3261 indicates? or does
Openser drop it?
Ok, it drops it, confirmed.
6:36 p.m.
El Thursday 19 June 2008 17:30:34 Klaus Darilion escribió:
Iñaki Baz Castillo schrieb:
Yes sure, I meant also a 183 Session Progress.
--
Iñaki Baz Castillo
ibc(a)in.ilimit.es
El Thursday 19 June 2008 16:51:57 Iñaki Baz
Castillo escribió:
AFAIK "100 trying" must not be relayed. Hi, I'm experimenting problems with my
carrier gateway since sometimes
it doesn't reply "100 Trying" in several seconds.
I set "fr_timer" to 12 seconds so after this time the transaction is
closed.
In case the response ("100 Trying") arrives more than "fr_timer"
seconds
to OpenSer, does OpenSer forward it upstream as RFC3261 indicates? or
does Openser drop it?
Ok, it drops it, confirmed.
7:29 p.m.
New subject: [OpenSER-Users] Does OpenSer allow a response after "fr_timer" going upstream?
Iñaki Baz Castillo schrieb:
El Thursday 19 June 2008 17:30:34 Klaus Darilion
escribió:
183 is not relayed back to UAC?
regards
klaus
Iñaki Baz Castillo schrieb:
Yes sure, I meant also a 183 Session Progress. El Thursday 19 June 2008 16:51:57 Iñaki Baz
Castillo escribió:
AFAIK "100
trying" must not be relayed. Hi, I'm experimenting problems with my
carrier gateway since sometimes
it doesn't reply "100 Trying" in several seconds.
I set "fr_timer" to 12 seconds so after this time the transaction is
closed.
In case the response ("100 Trying") arrives more than "fr_timer"
seconds
to OpenSer, does OpenSer forward it upstream as RFC3261 indicates? or
does Openser drop it?
Ok, it drops it, confirmed.
7:30 p.m.
El Thursday 19 June 2008 18:29:29 Klaus Darilion escribió:
Iñaki Baz Castillo schrieb:
Not if the 183 is not matched against and existing OpenSer client transaction.
Maybe there is an option (dissabled by default for sure) to allow non
matching replies being forwarded upstream? I expect yes, since it's the
behaviour in stateless.
--
Iñaki Baz Castillo
ibc(a)in.ilimit.es
El Thursday 19 June 2008 17:30:34 Klaus Darilion
escribió:
183 is not relayed back to UAC? Iñaki Baz Castillo schrieb:
Yes sure, I meant also a 183 Session Progress. El Thursday 19 June 2008 16:51:57 Iñaki Baz
Castillo escribió:
> Hi, I'm experimenting problems with my carrier gateway since sometimes
> it doesn't reply "100 Trying" in several seconds.
> I set "fr_timer" to 12 seconds so after this time the transaction is
> closed.
>
> In case the response ("100 Trying") arrives more than "fr_timer"
> seconds to OpenSer, does OpenSer forward it upstream as RFC3261
> indicates? or does Openser drop it?
Ok, it drops it, confirmed.
AFAIK "100 trying" must not be relayed.
20 Jun
20 Jun
10:42 a.m.
New subject: [OpenSER-Users] Does OpenSer allow a response after "fr_timer" going upstream?
Iñaki Baz Castillo schrieb:
El Thursday 19 June 2008 18:29:29 Klaus Darilion
escribió:
AFAIK replies are always forwarded except you manually drop it in a
reply route. (dropping is possible only for 1xx)
klaus
Iñaki Baz Castillo schrieb:
Not if the 183 is not matched against and existing OpenSer client transaction.
Maybe there is an option (dissabled by default for sure) to allow non
matching replies being forwarded upstream? I expect yes, since it's the
behaviour in stateless. El Thursday 19 June 2008 17:30:34 Klaus Darilion
escribió:
183 is not relayed back to UAC? Iñaki Baz Castillo schrieb:
> El Thursday 19 June 2008 16:51:57 Iñaki Baz Castillo escribió:
>> Hi, I'm experimenting problems with my carrier gateway since sometimes
>> it doesn't reply "100 Trying" in several seconds.
>> I set "fr_timer" to 12 seconds so after this time the transaction is
>> closed.
>>
>> In case the response ("100 Trying") arrives more than
"fr_timer"
>> seconds to OpenSer, does OpenSer forward it upstream as RFC3261
>> indicates? or does Openser drop it?
> Ok, it drops it, confirmed.
AFAIK "100 trying" must not be relayed.
Yes sure, I meant also a 183
Session Progress.
2:49 p.m.
El Friday 20 June 2008 09:42:27 Klaus Darilion escribió:
Iñaki Baz Castillo schrieb:
Hi Klaus, the problem I'm having is explained in other mail I sent yesterday:
http://lists.openser.org/pipermail/users/2008-June/018187.html
Sometimes it seems that my OpenSer doesn't match replies from the gateway
(100, 183...) with the outgoing client transaction, so in this case the reply
is not processed by "on_reply_route" (it is not matched as a current
transaction response). I captured all the traffic with NGREP and confirm that
the 183 is not forwarded upstream.
Anyway, I don't care it since I don't have a stateless proxy but a statefull
one. My big big problem is: why OpenSer doesn't match the reply? it's all OK
(branch, CSeq and so). If you could read my other mail I'd be very grateful.
Thanks a lot.
--
Iñaki Baz Castillo
ibc(a)in.ilimit.es
El Thursday 19 June 2008 18:29:29 Klaus Darilion
escribió:
AFAIK replies are always forwarded except you manually drop it in a
reply route. (dropping is possible only for 1xx) Iñaki Baz Castillo schrieb:
Not if the 183 is not matched against and existing OpenSer client
transaction. Maybe there is an option (dissabled by default for sure) to
allow non matching replies being forwarded upstream? I expect yes, since
it's the behaviour in stateless. El Thursday 19 June 2008 17:30:34 Klaus Darilion
escribió:
> Iñaki Baz Castillo schrieb:
>> El Thursday 19 June 2008 16:51:57 Iñaki Baz Castillo escribió:
>>> Hi, I'm experimenting problems with my carrier gateway since
>>> sometimes it doesn't reply "100 Trying" in several seconds.
>>> I set "fr_timer" to 12 seconds so after this time the transaction
is
>>> closed.
>>>
>>> In case the response ("100 Trying") arrives more than
"fr_timer"
>>> seconds to OpenSer, does OpenSer forward it upstream as RFC3261
>>> indicates? or does Openser drop it?
>>
>> Ok, it drops it, confirmed.
>
> AFAIK "100 trying" must not be relayed.
Yes sure, I meant also a 183 Session Progress.
183 is not relayed back to UAC?
6001
days inactive
6002
days old
7 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Iñaki Baz Castillo -
Klaus Darilion