16 Feb
2005
16 Feb
'05
3:55 p.m.
Ah k, I checked out the cvsroot of ser and everything is dated months
ago. Is there something I'm missing? :-).. Also ser "stable" is still at
0.9.0 right?
-----Original Message-----
From: Jamey Hicks [mailto:jamey.hicks@hp.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2005 7:47 AM
To: Matt Schulte
Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
Subject: Re: [Serusers] Ok, I gotta ask..
Matt Schulte wrote:
Is ser being actively developed anymore? Everywhere I
go on iptel's
website, everything is horridly outdated. Is there an alternative to
ser? We like ser a lot but don't want to continue inhouse devel on a
"dead" program. Asterisk doesn't even come close to the processing
power of ser, that can't be it... ??
Ser is still being actively developed. If you're doing in-house
development on ser, I suggest you join the serdev mailing list so that
you can keep up on what's going on with other ser developments.
Jamey
16 Feb
16 Feb
4:07 p.m.
New subject: [Serusers] Ok, I gotta ask..
Jamey:
Has 0.9.0 moved to current stable status? I thought it was still
in that transition state.
Thanks,Steve
Matt Schulte wrote:
Ah k, I checked out the cvsroot of ser and everything
is dated months
ago. Is there something I'm missing? :-).. Also ser "stable" is still at
0.9.0 right?
-----Original Message-----
From: Jamey Hicks [mailto:jamey.hicks@hp.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2005 7:47 AM
To: Matt Schulte
Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
Subject: Re: [Serusers] Ok, I gotta ask..
Matt Schulte wrote:
--
ISC Network Engineering
The University of Pennsylvania
3401 Walnut Street, Suite 221A
Philadelphia, PA 19104
voice: 215-573-8396
215-746-8001
fax: 215-898-9348
sip:blairs@upenn.edu
Is ser being actively developed anymore?
Everywhere I go on iptel's
website, everything is horridly outdated. Is there an alternative to
ser? We like ser a lot but don't want to continue inhouse devel on a
"dead" program. Asterisk doesn't even come close to the processing
power of ser, that can't be it... ??
Ser is still being actively developed. If you're doing in-house
development on ser, I suggest you join the serdev mailing list so that
you can keep up on what's going on with other ser developments.
Jamey
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
4:18 p.m.
New subject: [Serusers] Ok, I gotta ask..
Steve Blair wrote:
Jamey:
Has 0.9.0 moved to current stable status? I thought it was still
in that transition state.
My understanding is that 0.9.0 is still transitioning to release, and is
now on a branch in CVS. Meanwhile the cvs head is 0.10.99-dev0.
7:17 p.m.
New subject: [Serusers] Ok, I gotta ask..
Not yet, but we are close to stable status. So far no major flaws have
been discovered.
Jan.
On 16-02 09:07, Steve Blair wrote:
Jamey:
Has 0.9.0 moved to current stable status? I thought it was still
in that transition state.
Thanks,Steve
Matt Schulte wrote:
Ah k, I checked out the cvsroot of ser and
everything is dated months
ago. Is there something I'm missing? :-).. Also ser "stable" is still at
0.9.0 right?
-----Original Message-----
From: Jamey Hicks [mailto:jamey.hicks@hp.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2005 7:47 AM
To: Matt Schulte
Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
Subject: Re: [Serusers] Ok, I gotta ask..
Matt Schulte wrote:
--
ISC Network Engineering
The University of Pennsylvania
3401 Walnut Street, Suite 221A
Philadelphia, PA 19104
voice: 215-573-8396
215-746-8001
fax: 215-898-9348
sip:blairs@upenn.edu
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers Is ser being actively developed anymore?
Everywhere I go on iptel's
website, everything is horridly outdated. Is there an alternative to
ser? We like ser a lot but don't want to continue inhouse devel on a
"dead" program. Asterisk doesn't even come close to the processing
power of ser, that can't be it... ??
Ser is still being actively developed. If you're doing in-house
development on ser, I suggest you join the serdev mailing list so that
you can keep up on what's going on with other ser developments.
Jamey
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
7:28 p.m.
New subject: [Serusers] Ok, I gotta ask..
Jan,
Could you go to 0.9.0 as being stable
while serweb is still incompatible with 0.9.0 ?
Chris
-----Original Message-----
From: serusers-bounces(a)iptel.org [mailto:serusers-bounces@lists.iptel.org] On
Behalf Of Jan Janak
Sent: 16 February 2005 17:18
To: Steve Blair
Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
Subject: Re: [Serusers] Ok, I gotta ask..
Not yet, but we are close to stable status. So far no major flaws have
been discovered.
Jan.
On 16-02 09:07, Steve Blair wrote:
Jamey:
Has 0.9.0 moved to current stable status? I thought it was still
in that transition state.
Thanks,Steve
Matt Schulte wrote:
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.8.8 - Release Date: 14/02/2005
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.8.8 - Release Date: 14/02/2005
Ah k, I checked out the cvsroot of ser and
everything is dated months
ago. Is there something I'm missing? :-).. Also ser "stable" is still at
0.9.0 right?
-----Original Message-----
From: Jamey Hicks [mailto:jamey.hicks@hp.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2005 7:47 AM
To: Matt Schulte
Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
Subject: Re: [Serusers] Ok, I gotta ask..
Matt Schulte wrote:
--
ISC Network Engineering
The University of Pennsylvania
3401 Walnut Street, Suite 221A
Philadelphia, PA 19104
voice: 215-573-8396
215-746-8001
fax: 215-898-9348
sip:blairs@upenn.edu
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers Is ser being actively developed anymore?
Everywhere I go on iptel's
website, everything is horridly outdated. Is there an alternative to
ser? We like ser a lot but don't want to continue inhouse devel on a
"dead" program. Asterisk doesn't even come close to the processing
power of ser, that can't be it... ??
Ser is still being actively developed. If you're doing in-house
development on ser, I suggest you join the serdev mailing list so that
you can keep up on what's going on with other ser developments.
Jamey
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
4:29 p.m.
New subject: [Serusers] Ok, I gotta ask..
Matt Schulte wrote:
Ah k, I checked out the cvsroot of ser and everything
is dated months
ago. Is there something I'm missing? :-).. Also ser "stable" is still at
0.9.0 right?
SER has been in a release phase for a couple of months, so mostly
testing and very few changes, but as I said in another message, CVS head
is open for development again.
7220
days inactive
7220
days old
5 comments
5 participants
participants (5)
-
Chris -
Jamey Hicks -
Jan Janak -
Matt Schulte -
Steve Blair