Ah k, I checked out the cvsroot of ser and everything is dated months ago. Is there something I'm missing? :-).. Also ser "stable" is still at 0.9.0 right?
-----Original Message----- From: Jamey Hicks [mailto:jamey.hicks@hp.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2005 7:47 AM To: Matt Schulte Cc: serusers@lists.iptel.org Subject: Re: [Serusers] Ok, I gotta ask..
Matt Schulte wrote:
Is ser being actively developed anymore? Everywhere I go on iptel's website, everything is horridly outdated. Is there an alternative to ser? We like ser a lot but don't want to continue inhouse devel on a "dead" program. Asterisk doesn't even come close to the processing power of ser, that can't be it... ??
Ser is still being actively developed. If you're doing in-house development on ser, I suggest you join the serdev mailing list so that you can keep up on what's going on with other ser developments.
Jamey
Jamey:
Has 0.9.0 moved to current stable status? I thought it was still in that transition state.
Thanks,Steve
Matt Schulte wrote:
Ah k, I checked out the cvsroot of ser and everything is dated months ago. Is there something I'm missing? :-).. Also ser "stable" is still at 0.9.0 right?
-----Original Message----- From: Jamey Hicks [mailto:jamey.hicks@hp.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2005 7:47 AM To: Matt Schulte Cc: serusers@lists.iptel.org Subject: Re: [Serusers] Ok, I gotta ask..
Matt Schulte wrote:
Is ser being actively developed anymore? Everywhere I go on iptel's website, everything is horridly outdated. Is there an alternative to ser? We like ser a lot but don't want to continue inhouse devel on a "dead" program. Asterisk doesn't even come close to the processing power of ser, that can't be it... ??
Ser is still being actively developed. If you're doing in-house development on ser, I suggest you join the serdev mailing list so that you can keep up on what's going on with other ser developments.
Jamey
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Steve Blair wrote:
Jamey:
Has 0.9.0 moved to current stable status? I thought it was still in that transition state.
My understanding is that 0.9.0 is still transitioning to release, and is now on a branch in CVS. Meanwhile the cvs head is 0.10.99-dev0.
Not yet, but we are close to stable status. So far no major flaws have been discovered.
Jan.
On 16-02 09:07, Steve Blair wrote:
Jamey:
Has 0.9.0 moved to current stable status? I thought it was still in that transition state.
Thanks,Steve
Matt Schulte wrote:
Ah k, I checked out the cvsroot of ser and everything is dated months ago. Is there something I'm missing? :-).. Also ser "stable" is still at 0.9.0 right?
-----Original Message----- From: Jamey Hicks [mailto:jamey.hicks@hp.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2005 7:47 AM To: Matt Schulte Cc: serusers@lists.iptel.org Subject: Re: [Serusers] Ok, I gotta ask..
Matt Schulte wrote:
Is ser being actively developed anymore? Everywhere I go on iptel's website, everything is horridly outdated. Is there an alternative to ser? We like ser a lot but don't want to continue inhouse devel on a "dead" program. Asterisk doesn't even come close to the processing power of ser, that can't be it... ??
Ser is still being actively developed. If you're doing in-house development on ser, I suggest you join the serdev mailing list so that you can keep up on what's going on with other ser developments.
Jamey
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
--
ISC Network Engineering The University of Pennsylvania 3401 Walnut Street, Suite 221A Philadelphia, PA 19104
voice: 215-573-8396
215-746-8001fax: 215-898-9348
sip:blairs@upenn.edu
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Jan, Could you go to 0.9.0 as being stable while serweb is still incompatible with 0.9.0 ? Chris
-----Original Message----- From: serusers-bounces@iptel.org [mailto:serusers-bounces@lists.iptel.org] On Behalf Of Jan Janak Sent: 16 February 2005 17:18 To: Steve Blair Cc: serusers@lists.iptel.org Subject: Re: [Serusers] Ok, I gotta ask..
Not yet, but we are close to stable status. So far no major flaws have been discovered.
Jan.
On 16-02 09:07, Steve Blair wrote:
Jamey:
Has 0.9.0 moved to current stable status? I thought it was still in that transition state.
Thanks,Steve
Matt Schulte wrote:
Ah k, I checked out the cvsroot of ser and everything is dated months ago. Is there something I'm missing? :-).. Also ser "stable" is still at 0.9.0 right?
-----Original Message----- From: Jamey Hicks [mailto:jamey.hicks@hp.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2005 7:47 AM To: Matt Schulte Cc: serusers@lists.iptel.org Subject: Re: [Serusers] Ok, I gotta ask..
Matt Schulte wrote:
Is ser being actively developed anymore? Everywhere I go on iptel's website, everything is horridly outdated. Is there an alternative to ser? We like ser a lot but don't want to continue inhouse devel on a "dead" program. Asterisk doesn't even come close to the processing power of ser, that can't be it... ??
Ser is still being actively developed. If you're doing in-house development on ser, I suggest you join the serdev mailing list so that you can keep up on what's going on with other ser developments.
Jamey
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
--
ISC Network Engineering The University of Pennsylvania 3401 Walnut Street, Suite 221A Philadelphia, PA 19104
voice: 215-573-8396
215-746-8001fax: 215-898-9348
sip:blairs@upenn.edu
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
_______________________________________________ Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Matt Schulte wrote:
Ah k, I checked out the cvsroot of ser and everything is dated months ago. Is there something I'm missing? :-).. Also ser "stable" is still at 0.9.0 right?
SER has been in a release phase for a couple of months, so mostly testing and very few changes, but as I said in another message, CVS head is open for development again.
-
Chris -
Jamey Hicks -
Jan Janak -
Matt Schulte -
Steve Blair