I am using OpenSER successfully (not in production yet, but will be in a month or so) using ndbcluster. I am, however, using MySQL 5.1.11 (it's beta) and disk-based tables. I don't think that will make much of a difference so long as you have enough memory for your tables if you are using 5.0.
Regards, - Brad The contents of this e-mail are intended for the named addressee only. It contains information that may be confidential. Unless you are the named addressee or an authorized designee, you may not copy or use it, or disclose it to anyone else. If you received it in error please notify us immediately and then destroy it.
Good to know I am not all alone there. I am currently using 5.0.27 in production. It seems fine so far but I only have 100 or so users. I will reply to the list if I see any funniness.
On Nov 20, 2006, at 9:22 AM, Watkins, Bradley wrote:
Quoting Brandon Price brandon@dacrib.net:
I'm also using openser together with mysql cluster (5.0.22) with about 30 users. So far I had no issue with this setup. I also loaded 20'000 randomized users in the cluster and still achieved 300 calls per second (using db-only usrloc mode and a fairly complex routing script with at least five sql queries per call setup / dual xeon machine). IMHO, mysql cluster and openser are a very good fit and probably represent one of the better solution for SIP server redundancy.
Christian
-
Brandon Price -
Christian Schlatter -
Watkins, Bradley