[Serusers] ser logging into the file? - ser 0.10.99 - sr-users - kamailio.org

List overview All Threads
Download

[Serusers] ser logging into the file? - ser 0.10.99

[Users] Meaning of CS_DIRTY

[Serusers] SER with LCR Config

TZieleniewski

10 Jan 2007 10 Jan '07

4:33 p.m.

Hi ! Is there in ser 0.10.99 a way to send the output to the file instead of syslog?? Previously for ser 0.9.7 I had it done throught the serctl tool. I had the logstderror=yes in my ser.cfg and the output was redirected to log file pointed by SER_LOGFILE inside serctl. Tomasz

Reply

Show replies by date

Greger V. Teigre

11 Jan 11 Jan

10:31 a.m.

Well, you can define a new log file for another facility in your /etc/syslog.conf and then configure ser to log to that facility instead. Better than using stderr g-) TZieleniewski wrote:

Hi ! Is there in ser 0.10.99 a way to send the output to the file instead of syslog?? Previously for ser 0.9.7 I had it done throught the serctl tool. I had the logstderror=yes in my ser.cfg and the output was redirected to log file pointed by SER_LOGFILE inside serctl. Tomasz _______________________________________________ Serusers mailing list Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers

Reply

TZieleniewski

11:37 p.m.

Greger V. Teigre napisał(a):

Well, you can define a new log file for another facility in your /etc/syslog.conf and then configure ser to log to that facility instead. Better than using stderr g-) TZieleniewski wrote:

Hi ! Is there in ser 0.10.99 a way to send the output to the file instead of syslog?? Previously for ser 0.9.7 I had it done throught the serctl tool. I had the logstderror=yes in my ser.cfg and the output was redirected to log file pointed by SER_LOGFILE inside serctl. Tomasz _______________________________________________ Serusers mailing list Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers

Well I know how to define the new log in syslog.conf but how can I distinguish that it is only ser?? i mean how can i point that particular subsystem is ser?? and how to set it in ser to log to such output file?? Tomasz

Reply

Atle Samuelsen

12 Jan 12 Jan

8:05 a.m.

HI, see inline. * TZieleniewski <tzieleniewski(a)o2.pl> [070111 23:37]:

Greger V. Teigre napisa?(a):

Well, you can define a new log file for another facility in your /etc/syslog.conf and then configure ser to log to that facility instead. Better than using stderr g-) TZieleniewski wrote:

Hi ! Is there in ser 0.10.99 a way to send the output to the file instead of syslog?? Previously for ser 0.9.7 I had it done throught the serctl tool. I had the logstderror=yes in my ser.cfg and the output was redirected to log file pointed by SER_LOGFILE inside serctl. Tomasz _______________________________________________ Serusers mailing list Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers

Well I know how to define the new log in syslog.conf but how can I distinguish that it is only ser?? i mean how can i point that particular subsystem is ser?? and how to set it in ser to log to such output file??

What about /usr/local/sbin/ser -ddddddddddddddddddd -E 1>/myfile.txt 2>/myfile.txt - Atle

Tomasz _______________________________________________ Serusers mailing list Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers

Reply

"tzieleniewski"

11:01 a.m.

I founded out that ser can utilize the local* subsystem so I used It but still those are only the debuging messages like: Jan 12 10:56:07 tomix ser: init_tcp: using epoll_lt as the io watch method (auto detected) Jan 12 10:56:07 tomix ./ser[4671]: Maxfwd module- initializing Jan 12 10:56:07 tomix ./ser[4671]: INFO: xlog null is "<null>" Jan 12 10:56:07 tomix ./ser[4671]: INFO: udp_init: SO_RCVBUF is initially 109568 an the others like: Listening on udp: 127.0.0.1 [127.0.0.1]:5060 udp: 192.168.1.2 [192.168.1.2]:5060 tcp: 127.0.0.1 [127.0.0.1]:5060 tcp: 192.168.1.2 [192.168.1.2]:5060 Aliases: tcp: tomix:5060 tcp: localhost:5060 udp: tomix:5060 udp: localhost:5060 are still send to terminal, is there a way in the ser.cfg file to redirect them as well to syslog? like with the log_stderr option?? #tomasz

HI, see inline. * TZieleniewski <tzieleniewski(a)o2.pl> [070111 23:37]:

Greger V. Teigre napisa?(a):

Well, you can define a new log file for another facility in your /etc/syslog.conf and then configure ser to log to that facility instead. Better than using stderr g-) TZieleniewski wrote:

Hi ! Is there in ser 0.10.99 a way to send the output to the file instead of syslog?? Previously for ser 0.9.7 I had it done throught the serctl tool. I had the logstderror=yes in my ser.cfg and the output was redirected to log file pointed by SER_LOGFILE inside serctl. Tomasz _______________________________________________ Serusers mailing list Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers

Well I know how to define the new log in syslog.conf but how can I distinguish that it is only ser?? i mean how can i point that particular subsystem is ser?? and how to set it in ser to log to such output file??

What about /usr/local/sbin/ser -ddddddddddddddddddd -E 1>/myfile.txt 2>/myfile.txt - Atle > > Tomasz > _______________________________________________ > Serusers mailing list > Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers

Reply

6531

days inactive

6533

days old

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

Manage subscription

4 comments

4 participants

tags (0)

participants (4)

"tzieleniewski"
Atle Samuelsen
Greger V. Teigre
TZieleniewski