Hello,
On 15/07/15 22:22, Andrey Utkin wrote:
2015-07-15 21:59 GMT+03:00 Alex Balashov
<abalashov(a)evaristesys.com>om>:
As far as I know, t_on_branch() should execute
for every branch, including
the first one. Do you have any other evidence that it doesn't, i.e. a simple
xlog statement?
I am unable to test this now in my local environment, but I
believe we
have tested this few days ago, and that was the reason why I added
record_route_advertised_address() also after lookup().
I haven't looked into kamailio sources about this yet.
If you are sure that t_on_branch route is supposed to be executed on
each branch, then I should retest it and let you know the results.
There's new RR-related issue: now tested it in different setup, and
record_route_advertised_address() doesn't write "transport=" attribute
when the call goes from websocket to TLS. So Linphone sends BYE via
UDP again.
if you run Kamailio behind NAT and want to advertise a different
(public) IP address in SIP headers, then it is recommended to use:
listen=privateip advertise publicip
See:
http://www.kamailio.org/wiki/cookbooks/4.3.x/core#listen
Then you simply keep using record_route() (no need for manual address
specification via record route preset or advertised address variants).
Cheers,
Daniel
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda -
http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Book: SIP Routing With Kamailio -
http://www.asipto.com