Latest SER should fallback to other known destinations if the first does
not reply within timer B/F based on multiple SRV and/or A/AAA records.
If not, please open bug on
This is very elegant,
However we are using lcr module for load distribution. The advantage
is that if one server is not available/busy then ser will send call to
another.
-Jai
www.bingotelecom.com
On 9/13/07, Michal Matyska <michal(a)iptel.org> wrote:
This BIND zone file should do the job. Requests relayed to
abc.com
should go 60% to gw1 and 40% to gw2.
$TTL 86400
$ORIGIN
abc.com.
@ IN SOA
ns.abc.com root (
1 ;
serial
1H ;
refresh
10M ;
retry
1W ;
expiry
1D ) ;
minimum
; service rr pri weight port target
_sip._udp SRV 10 60 5060 gw1
SRV 10 40 5060 gw2
gw1 A 192.168.1.1
gw2 A 192.168.1.2
On Thu, 2007-09-13 at 17:54 +0200, inge wrote:
Hi,
Can we used DNS SRV for outgoing call ? Can you show me an
example ?
Thanks.
Sincerly,
Adrien .L
Le jeudi 13 septembre 2007 à 10:16 -0400, Michal Matyska a
écrit :
> Hi,
>
> in SER 2.0 you can use DNS system with properly configured
SRV
records
> to achieve load balancing with non-equal
distribution.
>
> Michal
>
> On Thu, 2007-09-13 at 11:02 +0200, inge wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Is there a way to have something like a loadbalancing on
SER
for
> > outgoing calls ?
> >
> > I want to distribute the calls between two gateways.
Ideally,
with a
> > coefficient (ie. 60% for the first and
40% for the
second).
> >
> > Thanks for your support.
> >
> > Adrien .L
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Serusers mailing list
> > Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
> >
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers