Hi Cesc!
Nice to have those fixes in a package.
Is your cfg.y-patch to be applied *after* cfg.y.patch was applied or *instead* of cfg.y.patch?
Or is your version a patched one which replaces the original implementation as a whole? In that case where's cfg.lex.patch?
Alex Mack
Cesc Santasusana schrieb:
Hi,
I really hate to be so pushy, but i dont understand how such an important piece of code as TLS is not moving on into CVS ... or anywhere else by this matter. I will keep sending patches till i get tired (soon).
Anyway ... i thought someone may be interested in a compilation fix for cfg.y introduced with the tls_domains (it would not compile if the cfg.y file had been patched but the tls-core files were not there); a bug fix for the session caching (fixed by turning session caching and resumption off); and an extension (the ability to choose the list of allowed ciphers from the config file). Oh, and all the files have been tabbed, instead of spaced (for indentation).
Enjoy!
Cesc
Unclassified
Serdev mailing list serdev@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serdev
could iptel folks who control ser cvs please give a definite answer regarding committing some tls code (either iptel's or this other one) to cvs?
i personally hope that the answer is yes and that the commit can be done soon.
if it is no, then i guess the only choice is to set up another cvs server somewhere that, i would suggest, would hold rel_0_9_0 plus the free tls code. since changes to rel_0_9_0 are not that frequent, it would be easier to keep it up to date than HEAD + free tls.
-- juha
-
Alex Mack -
Juha Heinanen