3 May
2005
3 May
'05
2:26 p.m.
Hi Cesc!
Nice to have those fixes in a package.
Is your cfg.y-patch to be applied *after* cfg.y.patch was applied or
*instead* of cfg.y.patch?
Or is your version a patched one which replaces the original
implementation as a whole? In that case where's cfg.lex.patch?
Alex Mack
Cesc Santasusana schrieb:
Hi,
I really hate to be so pushy, but i dont understand how such an important piece of code as
TLS is not moving on into CVS ... or anywhere else by this matter. I will keep sending
patches till i get tired (soon).
Anyway ... i thought someone may be interested in a compilation fix for cfg.y introduced
with the tls_domains (it would not compile if the cfg.y file had been patched but the
tls-core files were not there); a bug fix for the session caching (fixed by turning
session caching and resumption off); and an extension (the ability to choose the list of
allowed ciphers from the config file). Oh, and all the files have been tabbed, instead of
spaced (for indentation).
Enjoy!
Cesc
Unclassified
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Serdev mailing list
serdev(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serdev
3 May
3 May
2:43 p.m.
could iptel folks who control ser cvs please give a definite answer
regarding committing some tls code (either iptel's or this other one) to
cvs?
i personally hope that the answer is yes and that the commit can be done
soon.
if it is no, then i guess the only choice is to set up another cvs
server somewhere that, i would suggest, would hold rel_0_9_0 plus the
free tls code. since changes to rel_0_9_0 are not that frequent, it
would be easier to keep it up to date than HEAD + free tls.
-- juha
7150
days inactive
7150
days old
1 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Alex Mack -
Juha Heinanen