Now the backtrace is different, gram the output for info locals in frame 5 and 6.
Cheers, Daniel
On 10.01.18 11:26, jenus@cyberchaos.nl wrote:
I have overwritten the core file b y accident. I did a new backtrace:
(gdb) backtrace #0 0x00007fd3b24365a0 in ?? () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblua5.1.so.0 #1 0x00007fd3b2437b62 in ?? () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblua5.1.so.0 #2 0x00007fd3b242a040 in lua_settable () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblua5.1.so.0 #3 0x00007fd3b243a412 in luaL_findtable () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblua5.1.so.0 #4 0x00007fd3b243a581 in luaL_openlib () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblua5.1.so.0 #5 0x00007fd3b2684870 in lua_sr_kemi_register_libs (L=0xeffdb0) at app_lua_sr.c:1973 #6 0x00007fd3b26cf107 in lua_sr_openlibs (L=0xeffdb0) at app_lua_api.c:185 #7 0x00007fd3b26cf7c1 in lua_sr_init_probe () at app_lua_api.c:225 #8 0x00007fd3b265b97d in child_init (rank=-127) at app_lua_mod.c:197 #9 0x0000000000549944 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fd3bc82cc70, rank=-127) at core/sr_module.c:938 #10 0x0000000000549c72 in init_child (rank=-127) at core/sr_module.c:964 #11 0x0000000000422c1c in main_loop () at main.c:1576 #12 0x000000000042aab9 in main (argc=3, argv=0x7ffeee95b548) at main.c:2646
(gdb) frame 7 #7 0x00007fd3b26cf7c1 in lua_sr_init_probe () at app_lua_api.c:225 225 app_lua_api.c: No such file or directory. (gdb) list 220 in app_lua_api.c (gdb) info locals L = 0xeffdb0 txt = 0x7fd3bd00dce7 <__fprintf+135> "H\201\304", <incomplete sequence \330> li = 0x0 sbuf = {st_dev = 0, st_ino = 206158430256, st_nlink = 140732901208248, st_mode = 4002787296, st_uid = 32766, st_gid = 4002787464, __pad0 = 14, st_rdev = 140728898420739, st_size = 0, st_blksize = 30795, st_blocks = 7970120, st_atim = {tv_sec = 7929944, tv_nsec = 0}, st_mtim = {tv_sec = 0, tv_nsec = 140732901208128}, st_ctim = {tv_sec = 140547210663782, tv_nsec = 7938688}, __glibc_reserved = {-541165879423, 140732901208240, 5544260}} __FUNCTION__ = "lua_sr_init_probe"
I assume that in this case i need to do a "frame 7".
Jan
Daniel-Constantin Mierla schreef op 2018-01-10 11:18:
Few more things to grab from core file with gdb -- take the output for the next commands:
frame 16
list
info locals
Cheers, Daniel
On 10.01.18 11:08, jenus@cyberchaos.nl wrote:
Daniel,
Here are the app_lua settings:
# ----- app_lua params ----- modparam("app_lua", "load", "/etc/kamailio/kamailio_functions.lua") modparam("app_lua", "register", "sqlops") modparam("app_lua", "register", "siputils") modparam("app_lua", "register", "xhttp")
Jan
Daniel-Constantin Mierla schreef op 2018-01-10 11:03:
Can you give here the parameters you set for app_lua module?
Cheers, Daniel
On 09.01.18 22:27, jenus@cyberchaos.nl wrote:
Daniel,
Here is the backtrace.
(gdb) backtrace #0 0x00007fe41140e067 in __GI_raise (sig=sig@entry=6) at ../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c:56 #1 0x00007fe41140f448 in __GI_abort () at abort.c:89 #2 0x00007fe41144c1b4 in __libc_message (do_abort=do_abort@entry=1, fmt=fmt@entry=0x7fe411541210 "*** Error in `%s': %s: 0x%s ***\n") at ../sysdeps/posix/libc_fatal.c:175 #3 0x00007fe41145198e in malloc_printerr (action=1, str=0x7fe41153d42a "realloc(): invalid next size", ptr=<optimized out>) at malloc.c:4996 #4 0x00007fe41145476b in _int_realloc (av=av@entry=0x7fe41177e620 <main_arena>, oldp=oldp@entry=0x21789c0, oldsize=oldsize@entry=736, nb=nb@entry=1552) at malloc.c:4234 #5 0x00007fe411455769 in __GI___libc_realloc (oldmem=0x21789d0, bytes=1536) at malloc.c:3029 #6 0x00007fe40c460cae in ?? () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblua5.1.so.0 #7 0x00007fe40c45c9aa in ?? () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblua5.1.so.0 #8 0x00007fe40c46166d in ?? () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblua5.1.so.0 #9 0x00007fe40c4640b3 in ?? () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblua5.1.so.0 #10 0x00007fe40c45ccd1 in ?? () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblua5.1.so.0 #11 0x00007fe40c45c92e in ?? () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblua5.1.so.0 #12 0x00007fe40c45d7bb in ?? () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblua5.1.so.0 #13 0x00007fe40c45d8c2 in ?? () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblua5.1.so.0 #14 0x00007fe40c459528 in lua_load () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblua5.1.so.0 #15 0x00007fe40c469d8c in luaL_loadbuffer () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblua5.1.so.0 #16 0x00007fe40c6fe7d7 in lua_sr_init_probe () at app_lua_api.c:228 #17 0x00007fe40c68a97d in child_init (rank=-127) at app_lua_mod.c:197 #18 0x0000000000549944 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c3b998, rank=-127) at core/sr_module.c:938 #19 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c3bec0, rank=-127) at core/sr_module.c:935 #20 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c3c708, rank=-127) at core/sr_module.c:935 #21 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c3cd78, rank=-127) at core/sr_module.c:935 #22 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c3d360, rank=-127) at core/sr_module.c:935 #23 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c3e1e8, rank=-127) at core/sr_module.c:935 #24 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c3e938, rank=-127) at core/sr_module.c:935 #25 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c3f4c8, rank=-127) at core/sr_module.c:935 #26 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c3fca0, rank=-127) at core/sr_module.c:935 #27 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c40118, rank=-127) at core/sr_module.c:935 #28 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c40780, rank=-127) at core/sr_module.c:935 #29 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c422f8, rank=-127) at core/sr_module.c:935 #30 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c42968, rank=-127) at core/sr_module.c:935 #31 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c42e50, rank=-127) at core/sr_module.c:935 #32 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c43b48, rank=-127) at core/sr_module.c:935 #33 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c43f20, rank=-127) at core/sr_module.c:935 #34 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c446e0, rank=-127) at core/sr_module.c:935 #35 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c44bd0, rank=-127) at core/sr_module.c:935 #36 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c44ec8, rank=-127) at core/sr_module.c:935 #37 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c45378, rank=-127) at core/sr_module.c:935 #38 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c458f0, rank=-127) at core/sr_module.c:935 #39 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c45e48, rank=-127) at core/sr_module.c:935 #40 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c464e8, rank=-127) at core/sr_module.c:935 #41 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c47278, rank=-127) at core/sr_module.c:935 #42 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c476f0, rank=-127) at core/sr_module.c:935 #43 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c47b68, rank=-127) at core/sr_module.c:935 #44 0x0000000000549c72 in init_child (rank=-127) at core/sr_module.c:964 #45 0x0000000000422c1c in main_loop () at main.c:1576 #46 0x000000000042aab9 in main (argc=3, argv=0x7ffe17f0e788) at main.c:2646
Jan
Daniel-Constantin Mierla schreef op 2018-01-09 22:21:
Can you install the debug symbols for kamailio as well? There should be a kamailio-dbg package or so ...
Then take again the backtrace, it should provide more information -- file and line for each frame, ...
Cheers, Daniel
On 09.01.18 21:21, jenus@cyberchaos.nl wrote: > Daniel, > > Just upgraded to 5.1 but kamailio now generates a core file. I'm > running debian 8.10. It seems to crash on liblua5.1.so.0 : > > Using host libthread_db library > "/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libthread_db.so.1". > Core was generated by `kamailio -m 1500'. > Program terminated with signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. > #0 0x00007f30c17f25a0 in ?? () from > /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblua5.1.so.0 > (gdb) backtrace > #0 0x00007f30c17f25a0 in ?? () from > /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblua5.1.so.0 > #1 0x00007f30c17f3b62 in ?? () from > /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblua5.1.so.0 > #2 0x00007f30c17e6040 in lua_settable () from > /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblua5.1.so.0 > #3 0x00007f30c17f6412 in luaL_findtable () from > /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblua5.1.so.0 > #4 0x00007f30c17f6581 in luaL_openlib () from > /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblua5.1.so.0 > #5 0x00007f30c1a40870 in lua_sr_kemi_register_libs () from > /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/kamailio/modules/app_lua.so > #6 0x00007f30c1a8b107 in lua_sr_openlibs () from > /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/kamailio/modules/app_lua.so > #7 0x00007f30c1a8b7c1 in lua_sr_init_probe () from > /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/kamailio/modules/app_lua.so > #8 0x00007f30c1a1797d in ?? () from > /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/kamailio/modules/app_lua.so > #9 0x0000000000549944 in ?? () > #10 0x0000000000549c72 in init_child () > #11 0x0000000000421498 in main_loop () > #12 0x000000000042aab9 in main () > > > > Thanks, > > Jan > > jenus@cyberchaos.nl schreef op 2018-01-09 20:53: >> Daniel, >> >> Currently running kamailio 5.0.5. >> >> Jan >> >> Daniel-Constantin Mierla schreef op 2018-01-09 13:27: >>> Hello, >>> >>> what version of kamailio are you using? >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Daniel >>> >>> >>> On 07.01.18 22:14, jenus@cyberchaos.nl wrote: >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> I'm doing some tests with a lua script and app_lua. I'm using >>>> sr.sqlops.query to insert records into the database but would >>>> like to >>>> test the exit status of the sql query. In kamailio i can do: >>>> >>>> if(!sql_query("kamailio", "INSERT INTO subscriber ...")) >>>> >>>> Is there some kind of exit status for the lua function >>>> sr.sqlops.query >>>> in order to do the same check in lua? In other words, is it >>>> possible >>>> to check if a sql query was successful in lua? The result seems >>>> to be >>>> nill in all cases for a INSERT in lua using sr.sqlops.query. >>>> >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> >>>> Jan Hazenberg >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List >>>> sr-users@lists.kamailio.org >>>> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List >> sr-users@lists.kamailio.org >> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users >
Daniel,
(gdb) frame 5 #5 0x00007fd3b2684870 in lua_sr_kemi_register_libs (L=0xeffdb0) at app_lua_sr.c:1973 1973 app_lua_sr.c: No such file or directory. (gdb) list 1968 in app_lua_sr.c (gdb) info locals _sr_crt_KSRMethods = 0xf0cf80 emods = 0xa59a00 <_sr_kemi_modules> emods_size = 37 i = 3 k = 35 n = 346 mname = "KSR.uac_redirect\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\256\240B\262\323\177\000\000й\360\000\000\000\000\000\004\000\000\000\323\177\000\000 ˏ\262\323\177\000\000\000\362\066\000\234\324\302Ͱ\375\357", '\000' <repeats 21 times>, "\065\246C\262\323\177\000\000@\265\225\356\376\177\000\000\000\000\000\000\377\377\377\377\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\177\241m\262\323\177\000" __FUNCTION__ = "lua_sr_kemi_register_libs"
(gdb) frame 6 #6 0x00007fd3b26cf107 in lua_sr_openlibs (L=0xeffdb0) at app_lua_api.c:185 185 app_lua_api.c: No such file or directory. (gdb) list 180 in app_lua_api.c (gdb) info locals No locals.
Jan
Daniel-Constantin Mierla schreef op 2018-01-10 12:40:
Now the backtrace is different, gram the output for info locals in frame 5 and 6.
Cheers, Daniel
On 10.01.18 11:26, jenus@cyberchaos.nl wrote:
I have overwritten the core file b y accident. I did a new backtrace:
(gdb) backtrace #0 0x00007fd3b24365a0 in ?? () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblua5.1.so.0 #1 0x00007fd3b2437b62 in ?? () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblua5.1.so.0 #2 0x00007fd3b242a040 in lua_settable () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblua5.1.so.0 #3 0x00007fd3b243a412 in luaL_findtable () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblua5.1.so.0 #4 0x00007fd3b243a581 in luaL_openlib () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblua5.1.so.0 #5 0x00007fd3b2684870 in lua_sr_kemi_register_libs (L=0xeffdb0) at app_lua_sr.c:1973 #6 0x00007fd3b26cf107 in lua_sr_openlibs (L=0xeffdb0) at app_lua_api.c:185 #7 0x00007fd3b26cf7c1 in lua_sr_init_probe () at app_lua_api.c:225 #8 0x00007fd3b265b97d in child_init (rank=-127) at app_lua_mod.c:197 #9 0x0000000000549944 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fd3bc82cc70, rank=-127) at core/sr_module.c:938 #10 0x0000000000549c72 in init_child (rank=-127) at core/sr_module.c:964 #11 0x0000000000422c1c in main_loop () at main.c:1576 #12 0x000000000042aab9 in main (argc=3, argv=0x7ffeee95b548) at main.c:2646
(gdb) frame 7 #7 0x00007fd3b26cf7c1 in lua_sr_init_probe () at app_lua_api.c:225 225 app_lua_api.c: No such file or directory. (gdb) list 220 in app_lua_api.c (gdb) info locals L = 0xeffdb0 txt = 0x7fd3bd00dce7 <__fprintf+135> "H\201\304", <incomplete sequence \330> li = 0x0 sbuf = {st_dev = 0, st_ino = 206158430256, st_nlink = 140732901208248, st_mode = 4002787296, st_uid = 32766, st_gid = 4002787464, __pad0 = 14, st_rdev = 140728898420739, st_size = 0, st_blksize = 30795, st_blocks = 7970120, st_atim = {tv_sec = 7929944, tv_nsec = 0}, st_mtim = {tv_sec = 0, tv_nsec = 140732901208128}, st_ctim = {tv_sec = 140547210663782, tv_nsec = 7938688}, __glibc_reserved = {-541165879423, 140732901208240, 5544260}} __FUNCTION__ = "lua_sr_init_probe"
I assume that in this case i need to do a "frame 7".
Jan
Daniel-Constantin Mierla schreef op 2018-01-10 11:18:
Few more things to grab from core file with gdb -- take the output for the next commands:
frame 16
list
info locals
Cheers, Daniel
On 10.01.18 11:08, jenus@cyberchaos.nl wrote:
Daniel,
Here are the app_lua settings:
# ----- app_lua params ----- modparam("app_lua", "load", "/etc/kamailio/kamailio_functions.lua") modparam("app_lua", "register", "sqlops") modparam("app_lua", "register", "siputils") modparam("app_lua", "register", "xhttp")
Jan
Daniel-Constantin Mierla schreef op 2018-01-10 11:03:
Can you give here the parameters you set for app_lua module?
Cheers, Daniel
On 09.01.18 22:27, jenus@cyberchaos.nl wrote:
Daniel,
Here is the backtrace.
(gdb) backtrace #0 0x00007fe41140e067 in __GI_raise (sig=sig@entry=6) at ../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c:56 #1 0x00007fe41140f448 in __GI_abort () at abort.c:89 #2 0x00007fe41144c1b4 in __libc_message (do_abort=do_abort@entry=1, fmt=fmt@entry=0x7fe411541210 "*** Error in `%s': %s: 0x%s ***\n") at ../sysdeps/posix/libc_fatal.c:175 #3 0x00007fe41145198e in malloc_printerr (action=1, str=0x7fe41153d42a "realloc(): invalid next size", ptr=<optimized out>) at malloc.c:4996 #4 0x00007fe41145476b in _int_realloc (av=av@entry=0x7fe41177e620 <main_arena>, oldp=oldp@entry=0x21789c0, oldsize=oldsize@entry=736, nb=nb@entry=1552) at malloc.c:4234 #5 0x00007fe411455769 in __GI___libc_realloc (oldmem=0x21789d0, bytes=1536) at malloc.c:3029 #6 0x00007fe40c460cae in ?? () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblua5.1.so.0 #7 0x00007fe40c45c9aa in ?? () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblua5.1.so.0 #8 0x00007fe40c46166d in ?? () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblua5.1.so.0 #9 0x00007fe40c4640b3 in ?? () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblua5.1.so.0 #10 0x00007fe40c45ccd1 in ?? () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblua5.1.so.0 #11 0x00007fe40c45c92e in ?? () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblua5.1.so.0 #12 0x00007fe40c45d7bb in ?? () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblua5.1.so.0 #13 0x00007fe40c45d8c2 in ?? () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblua5.1.so.0 #14 0x00007fe40c459528 in lua_load () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblua5.1.so.0 #15 0x00007fe40c469d8c in luaL_loadbuffer () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblua5.1.so.0 #16 0x00007fe40c6fe7d7 in lua_sr_init_probe () at app_lua_api.c:228 #17 0x00007fe40c68a97d in child_init (rank=-127) at app_lua_mod.c:197 #18 0x0000000000549944 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c3b998, rank=-127) at core/sr_module.c:938 #19 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c3bec0, rank=-127) at core/sr_module.c:935 #20 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c3c708, rank=-127) at core/sr_module.c:935 #21 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c3cd78, rank=-127) at core/sr_module.c:935 #22 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c3d360, rank=-127) at core/sr_module.c:935 #23 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c3e1e8, rank=-127) at core/sr_module.c:935 #24 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c3e938, rank=-127) at core/sr_module.c:935 #25 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c3f4c8, rank=-127) at core/sr_module.c:935 #26 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c3fca0, rank=-127) at core/sr_module.c:935 #27 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c40118, rank=-127) at core/sr_module.c:935 #28 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c40780, rank=-127) at core/sr_module.c:935 #29 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c422f8, rank=-127) at core/sr_module.c:935 #30 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c42968, rank=-127) at core/sr_module.c:935 #31 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c42e50, rank=-127) at core/sr_module.c:935 #32 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c43b48, rank=-127) at core/sr_module.c:935 #33 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c43f20, rank=-127) at core/sr_module.c:935 #34 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c446e0, rank=-127) at core/sr_module.c:935 #35 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c44bd0, rank=-127) at core/sr_module.c:935 #36 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c44ec8, rank=-127) at core/sr_module.c:935 #37 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c45378, rank=-127) at core/sr_module.c:935 #38 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c458f0, rank=-127) at core/sr_module.c:935 #39 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c45e48, rank=-127) at core/sr_module.c:935 #40 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c464e8, rank=-127) at core/sr_module.c:935 #41 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c47278, rank=-127) at core/sr_module.c:935 #42 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c476f0, rank=-127) at core/sr_module.c:935 #43 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c47b68, rank=-127) at core/sr_module.c:935 #44 0x0000000000549c72 in init_child (rank=-127) at core/sr_module.c:964 #45 0x0000000000422c1c in main_loop () at main.c:1576 #46 0x000000000042aab9 in main (argc=3, argv=0x7ffe17f0e788) at main.c:2646
Jan
Daniel-Constantin Mierla schreef op 2018-01-09 22:21: > Can you install the debug symbols for kamailio as well? There > should be > a kamailio-dbg package or so ... > > Then take again the backtrace, it should provide more information > -- > file and line for each frame, ... > > Cheers, > Daniel > > > On 09.01.18 21:21, jenus@cyberchaos.nl wrote: >> Daniel, >> >> Just upgraded to 5.1 but kamailio now generates a core file. I'm >> running debian 8.10. It seems to crash on liblua5.1.so.0 : >> >> Using host libthread_db library >> "/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libthread_db.so.1". >> Core was generated by `kamailio -m 1500'. >> Program terminated with signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. >> #0 0x00007f30c17f25a0 in ?? () from >> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblua5.1.so.0 >> (gdb) backtrace >> #0 0x00007f30c17f25a0 in ?? () from >> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblua5.1.so.0 >> #1 0x00007f30c17f3b62 in ?? () from >> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblua5.1.so.0 >> #2 0x00007f30c17e6040 in lua_settable () from >> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblua5.1.so.0 >> #3 0x00007f30c17f6412 in luaL_findtable () from >> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblua5.1.so.0 >> #4 0x00007f30c17f6581 in luaL_openlib () from >> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblua5.1.so.0 >> #5 0x00007f30c1a40870 in lua_sr_kemi_register_libs () from >> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/kamailio/modules/app_lua.so >> #6 0x00007f30c1a8b107 in lua_sr_openlibs () from >> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/kamailio/modules/app_lua.so >> #7 0x00007f30c1a8b7c1 in lua_sr_init_probe () from >> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/kamailio/modules/app_lua.so >> #8 0x00007f30c1a1797d in ?? () from >> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/kamailio/modules/app_lua.so >> #9 0x0000000000549944 in ?? () >> #10 0x0000000000549c72 in init_child () >> #11 0x0000000000421498 in main_loop () >> #12 0x000000000042aab9 in main () >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Jan >> >> jenus@cyberchaos.nl schreef op 2018-01-09 20:53: >>> Daniel, >>> >>> Currently running kamailio 5.0.5. >>> >>> Jan >>> >>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla schreef op 2018-01-09 13:27: >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> what version of kamailio are you using? >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Daniel >>>> >>>> >>>> On 07.01.18 22:14, jenus@cyberchaos.nl wrote: >>>>> Hello, >>>>> >>>>> I'm doing some tests with a lua script and app_lua. I'm using >>>>> sr.sqlops.query to insert records into the database but would >>>>> like to >>>>> test the exit status of the sql query. In kamailio i can do: >>>>> >>>>> if(!sql_query("kamailio", "INSERT INTO subscriber ...")) >>>>> >>>>> Is there some kind of exit status for the lua function >>>>> sr.sqlops.query >>>>> in order to do the same check in lua? In other words, is it >>>>> possible >>>>> to check if a sql query was successful in lua? The result >>>>> seems >>>>> to be >>>>> nill in all cases for a INSERT in lua using sr.sqlops.query. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> >>>>> Jan Hazenberg >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List >>>>> sr-users@lists.kamailio.org >>>>> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List >>> sr-users@lists.kamailio.org >>> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users >>
-
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -
jenus＠cyberchaos.nl