Check the "Firewall Traversal-setting (STUN, ICE, rport, outbound proxy
etc.) in your xlite-clients. As I understand it, the MediaProxy (module +
server) is a network/server-side NAT-solution, xlite has a lot of
"client-side" NAT-traversal - they can be "in conflict".
And as both your servers and clients are on private IP-addresses - if either
xlite presents a public address (obtained using STUN?), that could be the
problem.
/Fredrik
----- Original Message -----
From: <pistara_bros(a)tin.it>
To: <serusers(a)lists.iptel.org>
Sent: Saturday, September 22, 2007 11:27 AM
Subject: Re: [Serusers] SER+Mediaproxy + X-LITE in the same LAN.
Bon jour à tout le monde,
I have other news about my investigation on
Mediaproxy and SER in the same Lan.
In the first test i used X-lite, as
UA clients,
running on windowsXP and i saw that RTP traffic
didn't
pass through MEDIAproxy (IP 192.168.123.186).
Now i'm using the client
"Express Talk" runnig on
windows XP (IP 192.168.123.168)
and X-lite
runnig on windows XP (IP 192.168.123.10)
and I see that MEDIAproxy work
correctly because
works as "man in the middle" and proxies the
RTP
packets between two clients.
Seems that it's necessary that one of
two
clients must be Express Talk, in order
to Mediaproxy work correctly.
I observe that,
if one client is Express Talk,
the second client
could be X-lite or Yate or
TiVi (
http://m.tivi.com/)
and MediaProxy
work OK.
But why Mediaproxy work correctly only
if i use "Express
Talk" as one peer client??
Any ideas?
Target clients for my
operational environment will be
TiVi (
http://m.tivi.com/) and i want
that using them
the RTP packet pass through Mediaproxy.
There's anyone
(sherlock holmes) in the forum that
could solve the mystery?
thanks a
lot.
Hi all, i'm newbie in SER,
I want to route RTP packets between
2
computers with x-lite client voip
in the same network through
Mediaproxy. I know this may have
no sense, but it's just a test
configuration.
The call use_media_proxy() seems to have no effect,
the RTP packets go directly from one computer to
another, no packet
trough Mediaproxy.
This is my environment:
SER and Mediaproxy on the
same PC
(192.168.123.186)
X-lite client_A running on 192.168.123.10
X-lite
client_B running on 192.168.123.168
Client_A call Client_B
that accept,
but mediaproxy refuses to
proxy the call.
Is
mediaproxy
working just between different networks
or it's an error
in my
configuration file?
Please help me. Any suggestions?
Orazio
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers