This may be true for open source softphone. What about hardphone?
MOhammad
Original Message: ----------------- From: Juha Heinanen jh@tutpro.com Date: Fri, 27 May 2005 16:51:26 +0300 To: kofi@radiocomplex.com, serusers@iptel.org Subject: Re: [Serusers] G723.1 vs G729
the problem with BOTH g.723 and g.729 is that they are not free and thus cannot be included in free, open source sip UAs. for that reason, i don't see any reason to favor their use. the free alternatives are iLBC and speex.
-- juha
_______________________________________________ Serusers mailing list Serusers@iptel.org http://mail.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
-------------------------------------------------------------------- mail2web - Check your email from the web at http://mail2web.com/ .
same, be careful when buying hardphones the cheaper ones, will usually not come with G729 built in
info@beeplove.com wrote:
This may be true for open source softphone. What about hardphone?
MOhammad
Original Message:
From: Juha Heinanen jh@tutpro.com Date: Fri, 27 May 2005 16:51:26 +0300 To: kofi@radiocomplex.com, serusers@lists.iptel.org Subject: Re: [Serusers] G723.1 vs G729
the problem with BOTH g.723 and g.729 is that they are not free and thus cannot be included in free, open source sip UAs. for that reason, i don't see any reason to favor their use. the free alternatives are iLBC and speex.
-- juha
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
mail2web - Check your email from the web at http://mail2web.com/ .
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
.
-
infoļ¼ beeplove.com -
Iqbal