Thanks for the reponse, I gathered that much. My question is how long before the contact gets "removed"? It's late morning now and it's still there :-)
-----Original Message----- From: Marian Dumitru [mailto:marian.dumitru@voice-sistem.ro] Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2005 5:37 AM To: Matt Schulte Cc: serusers@lists.iptel.org Subject: Re: [Serusers] usrloc and replication
Hi Matt,
After expiration an before being removed, the contact are still kept in ZOMBIE state - you can see the state in DB changes.
Best regards, Marian
Matt Schulte wrote:
Ok, I'm using usrloc db_mode 2, I understand the timer checks every 60
seconds default to see who should be expired and all. What I don't understand is why I keep getting these messages:
Keeping binding '+13142664004','sip:s@69.29.57.253:3105' for replication
This contact expired nonetheless and should be removed, is there something I'm missing?
+--------------+--------------------------------------+--------------- +--------------+--------------------------------------+-- ----+ | username | contact | expires | +--------------+--------------------------------------+--------------- +--------------+--------------------------------------+-- ----+ | +13142664004 | sip:s@69.29.57.253:3105 | 2005-03-26 00:42:35 | | +13142664004 | sip:s@69.29.57.253:3118 | 2005-03-26 01:24:58 | +--------------+--------------------------------------+--------------- +--------------+--------------------------------------+-- ----+
Matt,
You get the message you mentioned "Keeping binding....." *only* if the contact is marked for replication. You can check this either in DB column replication, either into memory via "serctl ul show".
As in code the replication flag is hardcoded to 0 (disabled), I would say you inserted via fifo some contacts with replication value != 0. Or ???
If so, I'm not sure if usrloc will ever remove the contact if the replication flag is still set.
Best regards, Marian
Matt Schulte wrote:
Thanks for the reponse, I gathered that much. My question is how long before the contact gets "removed"? It's late morning now and it's still there :-)
-----Original Message----- From: Marian Dumitru [mailto:marian.dumitru@voice-sistem.ro] Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2005 5:37 AM To: Matt Schulte Cc: serusers@lists.iptel.org Subject: Re: [Serusers] usrloc and replication
Hi Matt,
After expiration an before being removed, the contact are still kept in ZOMBIE state - you can see the state in DB changes.
Best regards, Marian
Matt Schulte wrote:
Ok, I'm using usrloc db_mode 2, I understand the timer checks every 60
seconds default to see who should be expired and all. What I don't understand is why I keep getting these messages:
Keeping binding '+13142664004','sip:s@69.29.57.253:3105' for replication
This contact expired nonetheless and should be removed, is there something I'm missing?
+--------------+--------------------------------------+--------------- +--------------+--------------------------------------+-- ----+ | username | contact | expires | +--------------+--------------------------------------+--------------- +--------------+--------------------------------------+-- ----+ | +13142664004 | sip:s@69.29.57.253:3105 | 2005-03-26 00:42:35 | | +13142664004 | sip:s@69.29.57.253:3118 | 2005-03-26 01:24:58 | +--------------+--------------------------------------+--------------- +--------------+--------------------------------------+-- ----+
There was another SER module written by Nils Ohlmeier that replicated the user location contacts to a set of servers and kept the replication state in usrloc. SER itself does not use the replication flag and, as Marian said, you probably set the replicate flag to non-zero value which is not correct.
Since you do not have the replication module, there is nothing that would reset the flag and the contact stays in the user location database forever.
The replication code was quite complex and it has been abandoned some time ago. I plan to remove the zombie states and all related code to make the usr location simpler.
Jan.
On 26-03 18:05, Marian Dumitru wrote:
Matt,
You get the message you mentioned "Keeping binding....." *only* if the contact is marked for replication. You can check this either in DB column replication, either into memory via "serctl ul show".
As in code the replication flag is hardcoded to 0 (disabled), I would say you inserted via fifo some contacts with replication value != 0. Or ???
If so, I'm not sure if usrloc will ever remove the contact if the replication flag is still set.
Best regards, Marian
Matt Schulte wrote:
Thanks for the reponse, I gathered that much. My question is how long before the contact gets "removed"? It's late morning now and it's still there :-)
-----Original Message----- From: Marian Dumitru [mailto:marian.dumitru@voice-sistem.ro] Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2005 5:37 AM To: Matt Schulte Cc: serusers@lists.iptel.org Subject: Re: [Serusers] usrloc and replication
Hi Matt,
After expiration an before being removed, the contact are still kept in ZOMBIE state - you can see the state in DB changes.
Best regards, Marian
Matt Schulte wrote:
Ok, I'm using usrloc db_mode 2, I understand the timer checks every 60
seconds default to see who should be expired and all. What I don't understand is why I keep getting these messages:
Keeping binding '+13142664004','sip:s@69.29.57.253:3105' for replication
This contact expired nonetheless and should be removed, is there something I'm missing?
+--------------+--------------------------------------+--------------- +--------------+--------------------------------------+-- ----+ | username | contact | expires | +--------------+--------------------------------------+--------------- +--------------+--------------------------------------+-- ----+ | +13142664004 | sip:s@69.29.57.253:3105 | 2005-03-26 00:42:35 | | +13142664004 | sip:s@69.29.57.253:3118 | 2005-03-26 01:24:58 | +--------------+--------------------------------------+--------------- +--------------+--------------------------------------+-- ----+
-- Voice System http://www.voice-system.ro
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Does the latest CVS version of SER send correct FramedIP in radius accounting. I am using 0.8.14 but it doesn`t send FramedIP Address.
If not is there any way to get the calling party`s IP address in radius accounting ?
Thanxs Deepak Singhal
No, as far as I know.
Jan.
On 28-03 12:54, Deepak Singhal wrote:
Does the latest CVS version of SER send correct FramedIP in radius accounting. I am using 0.8.14 but it doesn`t send FramedIP Address.
If not is there any way to get the calling party`s IP address in radius accounting ?
Thanxs Deepak Singhal
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Is there any plan to include this in near Future? I think this is an important feature.
Deepak Singhal
-----Original Message----- From: Jan Janak [mailto:jan@iptel.org] Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 11:28 PM To: Deepak Singhal Cc: serusers@lists.iptel.org Subject: Re: [Serusers] Framed IP radius Accounting
No, as far as I know.
Jan.
On 28-03 12:54, Deepak Singhal wrote:
Does the latest CVS version of SER send correct FramedIP in radius accounting. I am using 0.8.14 but it doesn`t send FramedIP Address.
If not is there any way to get the calling party`s IP address in radius accounting ?
Thanxs Deepak Singhal
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
What it is good for ?
Jan.
On 31-03 11:13, Deepak Singhal wrote:
Is there any plan to include this in near Future? I think this is an important feature.
Deepak Singhal
-----Original Message----- From: Jan Janak [mailto:jan@iptel.org] Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 11:28 PM To: Deepak Singhal Cc: serusers@lists.iptel.org Subject: Re: [Serusers] Framed IP radius Accounting
No, as far as I know.
Jan.
On 28-03 12:54, Deepak Singhal wrote:
Does the latest CVS version of SER send correct FramedIP in radius accounting. I am using 0.8.14 but it doesn`t send FramedIP Address.
If not is there any way to get the calling party`s IP address in radius accounting ?
Thanxs Deepak Singhal
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
So the CDR becomes more informative from client perspective. One can detect any misuse.
Deepak Singhal
-----Original Message----- From: Jan Janak [mailto:jan@iptel.org] Sent: Monday, April 04, 2005 5:24 PM To: Deepak Singhal Cc: serusers@lists.iptel.org Subject: Re: [Serusers] Framed IP radius Accounting
What it is good for ?
Jan.
On 31-03 11:13, Deepak Singhal wrote:
Is there any plan to include this in near Future? I think this is an important feature.
Deepak Singhal
-----Original Message----- From: Jan Janak [mailto:jan@iptel.org] Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 11:28 PM To: Deepak Singhal Cc: serusers@lists.iptel.org Subject: Re: [Serusers] Framed IP radius Accounting
No, as far as I know.
Jan.
On 28-03 12:54, Deepak Singhal wrote:
Does the latest CVS version of SER send correct FramedIP in radius accounting. I am using 0.8.14 but it doesn`t send FramedIP Address.
If not is there any way to get the calling party`s IP address in radius accounting ?
Thanxs Deepak Singhal
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
-
Deepak Singhal -
Jan Janak -
Marian Dumitru -
Matt Schulte